The influence of thinking styles and gender on students' creative thinking abilities in physical education

https://doi.org/10.25299/esijope.2024.vol5(2).16781

Authors

  • Dupri Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia/Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Adang Suherman Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Dian Budiana Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Tite Juliantine Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Thinking Style, Gender, Creative Thinking, Physical Education

Abstract

Background: Modern developments require Generation Z to be able to face future challenges that cannot be predicted. Research Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate how thinking styles and gender can develop creative thinking skills in students when learning physical education and also to investigate the interaction between thinking style and gender on creative thinking skills. Methods: This study used a non-experimental design. Thinking style is measured by learning and thinking style tests (SOLAT), and creative thinking skills are measured by the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT), which consists of four indicators: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The sampling technique in this study was cluster random sampling. The random process is carried out in two stages: the first is random selection by randomly selecting, and the second is the second is random assignment. The sample for this research was 68, consisting of 33 men and 35 women. Meanwhile, the analysis was done by looking at n-gain and continuing with the ANOVA test. Findings/Results: The results of this study indicate that thinking styles and gender significantly impact students' creative thinking ability, and there is also an interaction between thinking styles and types that significantly affects students' creative thinking ability. The analysis of the data obtained found a significant relationship between gender and students' creative thinking skills in physical education. Conclusion: Male students have better creative thinking skills than female students because they tend to use the right brain to develop their thinking skills. In developing creative thinking skills, grouping based on gender is necessary. Future research needs to be conducted by considering the right learning model for developing creative thinking skills during physical education learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dupri, Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia/Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Email: [email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-7386

mceclip0-8eca47f187461a9e6a619143c35ba627.png

Adang Suherman, Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Email: [email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-5524

mceclip7-c9784ccc3978c8fe530e0b0e065097b2.png

Dian Budiana, Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Email: [email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-433X

mceclip5-464d743b141986bb4ae0fe4067c19610.png

Tite Juliantine, Department of Sports Education, Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Email: [email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-0534

mceclip6-3d0f2f8cab9389c95a89c26a540e7504.png

References

Adnan, A., Beaty, R., Silvia, P., Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2019). Creative Aging: Functional Brain Networks Associated with Divergent Thinking in Older and Younger Adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 75, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.004

Anggorowati, W., Kariadinata, R., & Widiastuti A., T. T. (2024). Analysis of Creative Thinking Skill in Solving Mathematical Problems Viewed from the Types of Personality. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15928

Arumningsih, E., Setyawati, R. D., & Murtianto, Y. H. (2023). Students’ Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Open-Ended Problems Based on Personality Type. Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society, 5(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v5i2.280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v5i2.280

Ayyildiz, P., & Yilmaz, A. (2021). ‘Moving the Kaleidoscope’ to See the Effect of Creative Personality Traits on Creative Thinking Dispositions of Preservice Teachers: the Mediating Effect of Creative Learning Environments and Teachers’ Creativity Fostering Behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(3), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879

Aziz, R. (2023). Creativity in Higher Education: The Effect of Personality on Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.54916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.54916

Baker, J., & Gladstone, N. (2022). Girls Outperforming Boys in Nearly Every Subject. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/girls-now-out-performing-boys-in-nearly-every-hsc-subject-20221209-p5c56d.html

Botagariyev, T., Gabdullin, A., Akhmetova, A., Zhunusbekov, Z., & Saitbekov, N. (2023). The Effectiveness of Implementing Student Physical Perfectness Techniques for Creative Thinking Development. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23990

Chia, Y. M., Koh, H. C., & Pragasam, J. (2008). An International Study of Career Drivers of Accounting Students in Singapore, Australia and Hong Kong. Journal of Education and Work, 21(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080801957014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080801957014

Chiu, F. C., Hsu, C. C., Lin, Y. N., Liu, C. H., Chen, H. C., & Lin, C. H. (2019). Effects of Creative Thinking and Its Personality Determinants on Negative Emotion Regulation. Psychological Reports, 122(3), 916–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118775973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118775973

Chua, Y. P. (2016). Creative and Critical Thinking Styles. University Putra Malaysia Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275970223_Creative_and_Critical_Thinking_Styles

de Cássia Nakano, T., da Silva Oliveira, K., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender Differences in Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37, e372116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772E372116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116

Dupri, Candra, O., & Nazirun, N. (2021). The Implementation of Mini Volleyball in Physical Education to Increase Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(4A), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.13189/SAJ.2021.091315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.091315

Dupri, Nazirun, N., & Candra, O. (2021). Creative Thinking Learning of Physical Education: Can Be Enhanced using Discovery Learning Model? Journal Sport Area, 6(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5690

Ghanbari, S., Papi, M., & Derakhshanfard, S. (2020). Relationship between Thinking Styles and the Academic Achievement of Occupational Therapy Students in Iran. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_545_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_545_19

Handayani, A., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2021). Meta-Analisis Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.924

Lim, C.-S. (2014). Development of an Assessment Formula for Scientific Creativity and Its Application. Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.242

Lyra, M., Celi, R. C., Kieling, M. G., Lima, R. D. C. G. S., & Ros, M. A. DA. (2017). Thinking Styles in Physical Education Performing within the SUS. Fiep Bulletin - Online, 87(1), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.16887/87.a1.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16887/87.a1.32

Martínez-Romera, D. D. (2018). Sternberg-Wagner Thinking Styles: A Research Tool in Social Science Didactics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.422

Mkpanang, J. T. (2016). Influence of Creative Style and Gender on Students’ Achievement in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 42–46. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/29867/30679

Nada, E. I., & Sari, W. K. (2022). Analysis of Student’s Creative Thinking Ability Based on Gender Perspective on Reaction Rate Topic. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.23064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.23064

Nurjan, S. (2018). Pengembangan Berpikir Kreatif. Al-Asasiyya: Journal Of Basic Education, 3(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v3i1.1302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v3i1.1302

Phillips, W. J., Fletcher, J. M., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2016). Thinking Styles and Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(3), 260–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000027

Restrepo, K. J. G., Arias-Castro, C. C., & López-Fernández, V. (2019). A Theoretical Review of Creativity Based on Age. Papeles Del Psicologo, 40(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2901

Ross, S. D., Lachmann, T., Jaarsveld, S., Riedel-Heller, S. G., & Rodriguez, F. S. (2023). Creativity Across the Lifespan: Changes with Age and with Dementia. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03825-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03825-1

Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Critical Thinking, Creativity and Gender Differences for Knowledge Generation in Education. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 10(1), 3086–3093. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2019.0405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2019.0405

Sokić, K., Qureshi, F. H., & Khawaja, S. (2021). Gender Differences in Creativity among Students in Private Higher Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(11), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i11.3974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i11.3974

Teng, A. (2022). Girls fare just as well as boys in science and maths but later feel less confident in their abilities: NTU study. The Straits Time. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/girls-fare-just-as-well-as-boys-in-science-and-maths-but-later-feel-less-confident-in-their-abilities-ntu-study

Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., Uyen, B. P., & Son, T. H. (2020). Enhancing Creative and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Mathematics Classrooms: An Experimental Study of Teaching the Inequality in High Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080219

Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x

Torrance, E. P. (2018). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Interpretive Manual.

Wang, R. (2019). How to Use Creative Thinking in the Teaching and Training of College Physical Education. 7th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2019), Clausius Scientific Press. 633-637.

Xing, Z., & Qi, Y. (2023). Development of Creativity in Physical Education Teachers using Interactive Technologies: Involvement and Collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5763–5777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11422-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11422-9

Zhang, Y. (2020). How to Apply Creative Thinking to Physical Education Training in Colleges and Universities. Learning & Education, 9(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i1.869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i1.869

Published

2024-08-01

How to Cite

Dupri, Suherman, A., Budiana, D., & Juliantine, T. (2024). The influence of thinking styles and gender on students’ creative thinking abilities in physical education. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education , 5(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.25299/esijope.2024.vol5(2).16781
Received 2024-04-04
Accepted 2024-07-10
Published 2024-08-01

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.