Formulasi dan Kesantunan Tindak Tutur Izin ke Kamar Mandi dalam Bahasa Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2026.28066

Authors

Keywords:

Bathroom Permission, Speech Acts, Formulaic Language, Politeness, Pragmatics

Abstract

Asking for permission to go to the bathroom is a common linguistic practice in daily interactions, yet it carries complex pragmatic implications as it involves both individual needs and the orderliness of social interaction. This study aims to describe the formulation of bathroom permission speech acts in Indonesian and the pragmatic impact of these formulations on interaction. The study focuses on lexical variations, speech forms and structures, politeness strategies, and the acceptability of utterances across various interactional contexts. A qualitative approach with field research methods was employed. Oral data of bathroom permission utterances were collected through Discourse Completion Tasks (DCT), in-depth interviews, and covert field experiment. The data were analyzed using descriptive pragmatics, considering the speech situation, formulation structure, and the hearer's response. The results indicate that bathroom permission formulations are dominated by euphemistic locational references with the three most dominant lexicons being ke belakang (going to the back), ke kamar mandi (going to the bathroom), and toilet, and realized through indirect speech. The speech structure is graded according to the level of formality, ranging from complete structures in formal contexts to minimal structures in everyday settings. Furthermore, verbal and non-verbal politeness strategies play a crucial role in maintaining utterance acceptability and interactional flow, positioning bathroom permission as a socially negotiated cooperative interruption. Theoretically, this study contributes to the development of formulaic language studies in Indonesia by mapping social routine speech patterns that bridge individual biological needs with cultural politeness norms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afrizal, M., & Mijianti, Y. (2021). Kesantunan Interogatif Bahasa Jawa dalam Menanyakan Petunjuk Arah. Sutasoma : Jurnal Sastra Jawa, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/sutasoma.v9i1.46157

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism & dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford Univ. Press.

Alroumi, A. (2025). Turn-taking, interruption and (Im)Politeness: Evidence from Saudi Arabic interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 250, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.10.004

Austin, J. L., Urmson, J. O., & Sbisà, M. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed). Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8(2), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8

Hymes, D. (1977). Foundations In Sociolinguistics An Ethnographic Approach. Tavistock Publications.

Jahdiah, N. F. N. (2019). Penanda Kesantunan Imperatif dalam Bahasa Banjar:Tinjauan Pragmatik. TELAGA BAHASA, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36843/tb.v7i1.33

Kurniawati, A., & Hanafi, M. (2024). “Mohon Izin, Mas, Mbak”: Wujud Tuturan dan Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Interaksi Residen. Mahakarya: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Budaya, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22515/msjcs.v5i1.8575

Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Levin, M. (2014). The Bathroom Formula: A corpus-based study of a speech act in American and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.001

Pratiwi, A., Hartati, H., & Oktawati, H. (2025). Turn-Taking dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dosen dan Mahasiswa Universitas Merangin. Pena : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22437/pena.v15i2.47161

Rahardi, R. K. (1999). Imperatif dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Penanda-Penanda Kesantunan Linguistiknya. Humaniora, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.658

Rivai, N. T., & Putu, W. I. D. (2022). Interupsi oleh Pembawa Acara Pria dan Wanita dalam Program Talk Show Komedi di Indonesia: Intrusif atau Kooperatif? SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 14(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v14i2.5047

Santosa, R. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Linguistik/Pragmatik. PRASASTI: CONFERENCE SERIES, 0(0), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.432.g398

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Duta Wacana University Press.

Sukarno, S. (2018). Politeness Strategies, Linguistic Markers and Social Contexts in Delivering Requests In Javanese. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9816

Suri, N. K., Noviyanti, S., & Agustina, A. T. (2025). Teori Pragmatika Bahasa dan Kesantunan Berbahasa. Journal on Education, 7(2), 10107–10116. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i2.8016

Syafruddin. (2022). Bahasa Wianiaga (Perspektif Pragmatik). Tahta Media Group.

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Mijianti, Y., & Afrizal, M. (2026). Formulasi dan Kesantunan Tindak Tutur Izin ke Kamar Mandi dalam Bahasa Indonesia. GERAM, 14(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2026.28066