Lembar Praktikalitas: Instrumen yang Digunakan untuk Menilai Produk yang Dikembangkan pada Penelitian Pengembangan Bidang Pendidikan

Authors

  • Nilam Cahaya Universitas Islam Riau
  • Nurul Fauziah Universitas Islam Riau
  • Sepita Ferazona Universitas Islam Riau
  • Nurkhairo Hidayati Universitas Islam Riau
  • Mellisa Universitas Islam Riau

Keywords:

Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D)

Abstract

The practicality sheet plays an important role in the usability process of a product to be developed. Practicality sheets have a big influence on the level of use of a product, namely being practical, easy to understand and enjoyable for teachers or students to use the product. This research aims to develop a practicality sheet that can be used as an instrument in assessing the product being developed. The product that has been developed must be validated by experts in the field of education. After the product is said to be valid then the product is field tested on students where the product is said to be practical if the experts say that theoretically this product can be applied in the field and the level of workability is good, therefore the aim of this research is to develop a practicality sheet in accordance with instruments that are valid and validated by expert validators in the field of education. The practicality sheet development procedure is based on the PLOMP model research and development. This research takes place at the development stage. This practicality sheet consists of a grid and assessment rubric. The grid contains aspects and indicators. The assessment rubric contains indicators and criteria for assessment scores by the validator, apart from that it also contains provisions for scoring the questionnaire. The practicality sheet consists of 4 aspects which cover various indicators, namely 1) The display aspect has 4 indicators (readability of text, clarity of presentation, use of font), 2) The linguistic aspect has 1 indicator (use of language), 3) The material aspect contains 3 indicators, namely (sequence, presentation of material and study materials), 4) Presentation aspect consisting of 1 indicator (motivation). The practicality sheet developed has been validated by educational validators and the overall practicality sheet assessment received a percentage of 96.6% with a very valid validity category. This shows that the practicality sheet developed can be used as an instrument to assess a product developed in educational development research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Data, T. P. (2015). Instrumen Penelitian. Kisi-Kisi Instrumen.

Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Fidiana, E. (2017). Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Luwes Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga.

Fernandes, M., & Syarifuddin, H. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Pecahan Berbasis Model Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Kelas IV SD. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v4i1.4011

Gunawan, G. S. (2021). Analisis Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Gambar dalam Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Mandarin Secara Daring Pada Siswa Kelas VI SD Santa Lorent Surabaya Tahun 2021. Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan, 5(1), A04–A04.

Hasnunidah, N. (2017). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.

Kurniawan, H. (2021). Pengantar praktis penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Deepublish.

Makbul, M. (2021). Metode pengumpulan data dan instrumen penelitian.

Masnuah, S., Khodijah, N., & Suryana, E. (2022). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan islam dalam undang-undang no. 20 tahun 2003 (sisdiknas). MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 9(1), 115–130.

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung.Remaja Rosdakarya

Nadirah, S. P., Pramana, A. D. R., & Zari, N. (2022). metodologi penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, mix method (mengelola Penelitian Dengan Mendeley dan Nvivo). CV. Azka Pustaka.

Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Educational Design Research Educational Design Research.NetherlandsInstituteforCurriculumDevelopment:SLO,1206.

Novrianti, N. (2016). Teknik Pengembangan Dan Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 45–60.

Okpatrioka, O. (2023). Research and development (R&D) penelitian yang inovatif dalam pendidikan. Dharma Acariya Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 1(1), 86–100.

Rahmawan, E. F., Sumaryanto, T., & Supriyadi, S. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja kemampuan bernyanyi berbasis android. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 5(1), 81–89.

Satyaninrum, I. R., Tahirs, J. P., SE, M. M., Bhaga, B. J., Kpalet, P., Agustikawati, N., Aisyah, S., & SH I, M. H. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Cendekia Publisher.

Triana, A. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Validitas Reliabilitas Praktikalitas Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Non Cetak berupa Video.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-12

How to Cite

Cahaya, N., Fauziah, N., Ferazona, S., Hidayati , N., & Mellisa. (2024). Lembar Praktikalitas: Instrumen yang Digunakan untuk Menilai Produk yang Dikembangkan pada Penelitian Pengembangan Bidang Pendidikan. Biology and Education Journal, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/baej/article/view/16973

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>