CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS OF GRADE XI STUDENTS OF MA NURUL ISLAM LUMAJANG IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS: ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LEVEL OF ACADEMIC ABILITY
Keywords:
mathematical creative thinking, analysis of student ability, problem-based learningAbstract
Abstract
This study analyzes the mathematical creative thinking abilities of grade XI students at MA Nurul Islam Lumajang, focusing on their academic levels. Creative thinking is crucial for addressing 21st-century challenges, especially given the low national mathematics literacy highlighted by the 2018 PISA results. Despite the implementation of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model, its effectiveness in enhancing students' mathematical creativity remains suboptimal.
Using observation methods alongside teaching activities and documentation, the research involved both teachers and students. Findings indicate that students with high academic ability excel in creative thinking indicators, particularly in flexibility and precision. Conversely, those with medium and low abilities struggle to generate original and detailed solutions.
This underscores the need for personalized learning strategies tailored to individual student capabilities to foster mathematical creativity. Approaches such as open-ended question-based PBL are recommended to enhance students' fluency, flexibility, authenticity, and accuracy in creative problem-solving.
The results highlight the necessity of integrating adaptive learning strategies to improve the quality of mathematics education at the madrasah level. By focusing on these strategies, educators can better support students in developing essential creative thinking skills necessary for their future success.
Downloads
References
[1] W. Ariyani, H. Suyitno, and I. Junaedi, “Mathematical connection ability and students’ independence in missouri mathematics project E-learning,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.
[2] K. Khasanah and A. Lestari, “The Effect of Quizizz and Learning Independence on Mathematics Learning Outcomes,” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7288.
[3] M. H. Wathoni and H. R. P. Negara, “Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal lingkaran ditinjau dari habits of mind,” J. Didact. Math., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2024, doi: 10.34007/jdm.v5i1.2199.
[4] Qian Wang and Abdul Halim Abdullah, “Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Through Mathematics in Higher Education: A Systemic Review,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 21582440241275652, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241275651.
[5] P. P. Pendidikan, “Meningkatkan kemampuan literasi dasar siswa Indonesia berdasarkan analisis data PISA 2018,” Pus. Penelit. Kebijak., no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021.
[6] N. Sulfayanti, “Kajian Literatur: Faktor dan Solusi untuk Mengatasi Rendahnya Literasi Matematis Siswa,” J. Jendela Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 04, pp. 382–388, 2023, doi: 10.57008/jjp.v3i04.590.
[7] I. A. Kadir, T. Machmud, K. Usman, and N. Katili, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Segitiga,” Jambura J. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 128–138, 2022, doi: 10.34312/jmathedu.v3i2.16388.
[8] A. Elhilal, “Digital conceptual mapping for enhancing mathematical concept formation and creative mathematical problem-solving through cognitive flexibility skills: a mixed methods study,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2494945, 2025.
[9] N. O. M. Dairo, N. C. A. Okonkwo, and N. C. U. Orakwe, “A review of primary school teachers’ insight into traditional instruction and activity-based learning in mathematics education,” Int. J. Appl. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2778–2790, 2024.
[10] A. Wahyuni, Y. S. Kusumah, B. A. P. Martadiputra, R. Purwasih, I. Muhammad, and Z. Zafrullah, “INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) RESEARCH TRENDS IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 14, no. 2, 2025.
[11] A. Wahyuni, Y. S. Kusumah, B. A. P. Martadiputra, and Z. Zafrullah, “Tren penelitian kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada pendidikan matematika: Analisis bibliometrik,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 337–356, 2024, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v7i2.22329.
[12] J. Ö. Sigurjónsson, “Teaching mathematics with high cognitive activation: instructional formats and connection-making interactions in high-level Nordic lessons,” NOMAD Nord. Stud. Math. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, 2024.
[13] H. El Turkey, G. Karakok, E. Cilli-Turner, V. R. Satyam, M. Savić, and G. Tang, “A framework to design creativity-fostering mathematical tasks,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1761–1782, 2024.
[14] C. A. Rodríguez-Nieto, F. M. Rodríguez-Vásquez, V. F. Moll, S. Sudirman, and B. M. Cantillo-Rudas, “Engineering Students’ Mathematical Understanding Based on the Quality of Mathematical Connections Activated to Solve Tasks about Function’s Graph and Its Derivative.,” Educ. Process Int. J., vol. 17, p. e2025394, 2025.
[15] V. Rith, V. Sok, and R. Dara, “Analysis of factors that influence student creativity in solving mathematical problems,” J. Loomingulisus ja Innov., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 199–207, 2024.
[16] W. Niu, L. Cheng, D. Duan, and Q. Zhang, “Impact of perceived supportive learning environment on mathematical achievement: The mediating roles of autonomous self-regulation and creative thinking,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 781594, 2022.
[17] A.-R. H. Mastul, “The crucial role of teachers in fostering creativity, critical thinking, and motivation in students,” J. Prakt. Baik Pembelajaran Sekol. dan Pesantren, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 54–59, 2024.
[18] Y. Rahmawati, E. Taylor, P. C. Taylor, A. Ridwan, and A. Mardiah, “Students’ engagement in education as sustainability: implementing an ethical dilemma-STEAM teaching model in chemistry learning,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 3554, 2022.
[19] N. Monrat, M. Phaksunchai, and R. Chonchaiya, “Developing Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills Using Open‐Ended Questions and Activities Based on Student Learning Preferences,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 3300363, 2022.
[20] M. Gentile, G. Città, S. Perna, and M. Allegra, “Do we still need teachers? Navigating the paradigm shift of the teacher’s role in the AI era,” in Frontiers in Education, 2023, vol. 8, p. 1161777.
[21] C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, and M. Koole, “Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 715–742, 2021.
[22] Y. Zou, S. S. B. Mustakim, T. Sulaiman, and X. Lei, “Promoting high-order thinking skills through problem-based learning: Design and implementation,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 737–755, 2024.
[23] L. Yu and Z. M. Zin, “The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: a systematic review,” in Frontiers in Education, 2023, vol. 8, p. 1139987.
[24] Y. Raman, J. Surif, and N. H. Ibrahim, “The Effect of Problem Based Learning Approach in Enhancing Problem Solving Skills in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review.,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 18, no. 5, 2024.
[25] S. Sarnoko, A. Asrowi, G. Gunarhadi, and B. Usodo, “An Analysis of The Application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model in Mathematics for Elementary School Students,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 188–202, 2024.
[26] J. Polman, L. Hornstra, and M. Volman, “The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 469–486, 2021.
[27] L. M. Angraini, N. Kania, and F. Gürbüz, “Students’ proficiency in computational thinking through constructivist learning theory,” Int. J. Math. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2024.
[28] J. Šliogerienė, I. Darginavičienė, J. Suchanova, D. Gulbinskienė, and V. Jakučionytė, “Problem-based learning in developing students’ communicative skills and creativity in teaching English for specific purposes,” Creat. Stud., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2025.
[29] M. M. Aba, N. K. Rukman, and A. Fatmawati, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Problem Posing,” Math Educ. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2021, doi: 10.15548/mej.v5i2.3056.
[30] A. Rasnawati, W. Rahmawati, P. Akbar, and H. D. Putra, “Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMK Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel (SPLDV) Di Kota Cimahi,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 164–177, 2019, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v3i1.87.
[31] M. K. Nisak, H. Suwono, and Wartono, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, Dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2017.
[32] H. Hidayatsyah, “Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa menggunakan model problem based learning berbantuan Geogebra,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 458–470, 2021.
[33] C. P. B. Sitepu and A. Amidi, “Studi Literatur: Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Kolb Siswa dalam Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS),” Prism. Pros. Semin. Nas. …, vol. 7, pp. 129–136, 2024.
[34] D. Qu, T. Shevchenko, Y. Xia, and X. Yan, “Education and Instruction for Circular Economy: A Review on Drivers and Barriers in Circular Economy Implementation in China,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.1531a.
[35] Y. N. Kawitanto, A. H. Ma’ruf, and ..., “Korelasi Kreativitas Belajar Matematika dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa,” Pros. …, pp. 1–7, 2021.
[36] M. Karwowski, D. M. Jankowska, and W. Szwajkowski, “Creativity, Imagination, and Early Mathematics Education BT - Creativity and Giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond,” R. Leikin and B. Sriraman, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 7–22.
[37] Amidi and M. Z. Zahid, “Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Dengan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan E-Learning,” Semin. Nas. Mat. X Univ. Negeri Semarang 2016, pp. 586–594, 2016.
[38] Y.-F. Yeh, K. K. H. Chan, and Y.-S. Hsu, “Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process,” Comput. Educ., vol. 171, p. 104238, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238.
[39] Ibrahim, I. A. Khalil, and R. C. Indra Prahmana, “Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition?,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 253–276, 2024, doi: 10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp253-276.
[40] E. Aldilla, A. Asrizal, and U. Usmeldi, “Meta-Analysis of The STEM Application Effect on Students’ Creative Thinking,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2023, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v6i2.16218.
[41] J. Nilimaa, “New Examination Approach for Real-World Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 477–495, 2023.
[42] Z. Guo, “Research on the Impact of Digital Technology on Mathematical Creativity Based on Data Science Methods,” pp. 40–45, 2023, doi: 10.25236/icemudss.2023.005.
[43] J. Fetterly, “Fostering Mathematical Creativity While Impacting Beliefs and Anxiety in Mathematics,” J. Humanist. Math., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 102–128, 2020, doi: 10.5642/jhummath.202002.07.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 anggiarti dwi ariani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright @Author. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Copyrights of all materials published in the Mathematics Research and Education Journal are freely available without charge to users or / institutions.
Accepted 2025-10-30
Published 2025-11-14
