PEER REVIEW PROCESS
The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for the MREJ Journal focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Mendeley
The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation (double-blind peer review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
Review Outcomes
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. The review process will take approximately 4 to 8 weeks. Decisions categories include:
The reviewers' and editor's suggestions will be conveyed to the author, who will then have an opportunity to revise the paper. A manuscript returned to an author for revision can be held for a maximum of four weeks.
Correspondence
All correspondence concerning manuscripts should be directed to the Editor of MREJ Journal and cc to https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JPM. The Editor will direct all correspondence to the lead author; the lead author is responsible for sharing communications with other authors. Beyond communication concerning the review, manuscripts accepted for publication may require additional correspondence to complete copyediting and layout editing.
After Accepted
The accepted paper will be edited by a lecturer in the English education study program at FKIP UIR. The cost of language editing service is currently free
FANPAGE
|
---|
MANUSCRIPT TEMPLATE
|
---|
Mathematics Research and Education Journal (MREJ) P-ISSN : 2620-4169 E-ISSN : 2621-3885
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.