Hidden stakeholders and the social dimension of ESG: Transnational business sustainability through Qiaopi Culture and Dear You
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/ijbs.2026.29154Keywords:
Social Dimension of ESG, Business Sustainability, Qiaopi Culture, Hidden Stakeholders, Left-Behind Women, Social ReproductionAbstract
Purpose: Existing Qiaopi and ESG research largely emphasizes male migrants, financial remittances, and formal corporate stakeholders. This study examines how left-behind women functioned as hidden stakeholders who sustained geographically separated families, remittance networks, community trust, and cultural continuity in Southeast Asian Chinese business networks.
Design/methodology/approach: The study combines conceptual analysis with qualitative textual analysis. Literature on Qiaopi, transnational remittances, stakeholder theory, social sustainability, and gendered care labor was reviewed alongside Dear You. The materials were organized through a four-layer framework covering stakeholder recognition, social reproduction, cultural sustainability, and ESG social responsibility.
Findings: Qiaopi were not merely letters or remittance receipts; they operated as social infrastructure for transnational Chinese business networks. Left-behind women managed remittances, raised children, cared for elders, absorbed migration risks, and preserved cultural memory. Dear You makes these contributions visible through a family-centered narrative.
Limitations and Research implications: study relies on conceptual and textual analysis without systematic archival statistics or field interviews. Future research may compare Qiaopi materials across hometowns, destinations, and gendered sources.
Practical Implications: Cross-border enterprises and ESG practices should consider employee families, left-behind relatives, care labor, and cultural identity as relevant social foundations of long-term sustainability.
Originality/value: The study connects Qiaopi culture with business sustainability and extends stakeholder analysis by identifying low-visibility family actors as hidden stakeholders within the social dimension of ESG.
Downloads
References
Adam, S. B. (2026). Bridging the ethics gap: Reaffirming the role of accounting ethics in professional practice through content analysis. International Journal of Business Sustainability, 1(3), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.25299/ijbs.2026.25154
Awa, H. O., Etim, W., & Ogbonda, E. (2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y
Benton, G., & Liu, H. (2018). Dear China: Emigrant letters and remittances, 1820–1980. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520298439/dear-china
Benton, G., Liu, H., & Zhang, H. (Eds.). (2018). The qiaopi trade and transnational networks in the Chinese diaspora. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Qiaopi-Trade-and-Transnational-Networks-in-the-Chinese-Diaspora/Benton-Liu-Zhang/p/book/9780367445102
Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
Bryceson, D. F., & Vuorela, U. (Eds.). (2002). The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Berg. https://www.routledge.com/The-Transnational-Family-New-European-Frontiers-and-Global-Networks/Bryceson-Vuorela/p/book/9781859736814
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), Article 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/strategicmanagement/E3CC2E2CE01497062D7603B7A8B9337F
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Götze, U., Richter, F., & Döring, J. (2024). A stakeholder-related procedure model for social sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 16(23), Article 10396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310396
Harris, L. J. (2015). Overseas Chinese remittance firms, the limits of state sovereignty, and transnational capitalism in East and Southeast Asia, 1850s–1930s. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814001819
Hoang, L. A., Yeoh, B. S. A., & Wattie, A. M. (2014). Transnational migration, changing care arrangements and left-behind children’s responses in South-East Asia. Children’s Geographies, 13(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2014.953533
Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). Jonathan Cape.
Kofman, E. (2014). Gendered migrations, social reproduction and the household in Europe. Dialectical Anthropology, 38, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9330-5
Lan, H. (Director). (2026). Dear You / A Love Letter to Grandma [Film]. Shenzhen King Ant Pictures; Damai Entertainment; Rongde Holdings; Shenzhen Lichun Pictures.
Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839803200404
Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375
Liu, H., & Benton, G. (2016). The qiaopi trade and its role in modern China and the Chinese diaspora: Toward an alternative explanation of “transnational capitalism.” The Journal of Asian Studies, 75(3), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911816000535
Lutz, H., & Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. (2012). Care workers, care drain, and care chains: Reflections on care, migration, and citizenship. Social Politics, 19(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr026
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions (Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 27). University of South Australia. https://apo.org.au/node/565
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.-H., & Broman, G. (2017). A strategic approach to social sustainability—Part 1: Exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Moses, O. S., Opeyemi, G., & Salifu, O. J. (2025). Effect of financial inclusion on maize productivity among rural farming households in Ankpa local government area of Kogi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business Sustainability, 1(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.25299/ijbs.2025.22377
Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/children-global-migration
Shen, H. (2024). Remittance letters from Manila: The gendered, individual and emotional world of the Chinese diaspora. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 55(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463424000262
UNESCO. (n.d.). Qiaopi and Yinxin correspondence and remittance documents from overseas Chinese. Memory of the World. https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world/qiaopi-and-yinxin-correspondence-and-remittance-documents-overseas-chinese
United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/280911488968799581/pdf/113237-WP-WhoCaresWins-2004.pdf
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
