Cognitive Strategy Use dan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama

Authors

  • Kusumasari Kartika Hima Darmayanti Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia.
  • Veronica Kristiyani Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Efan Yudha Winata Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa, Sumbawa, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia.
  • Erlina Anggraini Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v3i1s.12341

Keywords:

cognitive use strategy, siswa laki-laki, siswa perempuan, Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Covid-19

Abstract

Setelah melalui proses pembelajaran secara daring, siswa SMP saat ini tengah menikmati proses pembelajaran secara tatap muka. Siswa SMP menerapkan cognitive use strategy (e.g., rehearsal, elaboration, dan organization) untuk memahami materi yang diperoleh di kelas. Di sisi lain, beberapa penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan siswa laki-laki dan perempuan dalam menerapkan cognitive use strategy. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan jenis kelamin dalam menerapkan cognitive use strategy pada siswa SMP di Jakarta. Penelitian ini melibatkan (n = 128) dengan menerapkan desain penelitian kuantitatif. Analisis independent sample t-test menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan untuk jenis kelamin laki-laki dan perempuan pada cognitive use strategy dengan t (126) = 2,38, p = 0,019. Secara spesifik, siswa perempuan (M = 3,04; SD = 0,33) lebih sering menerapkan cognitive strategy use dibandingkan siswa laki-laki (M = 2,90; SD = 0,34). Hasil penelitian ini menjadi dasar untuk melakukan intervensi psikologi bidang psikologi Pendidikan untuk meningkatkan self-regulated learning siswa dengan memperhatikan cognitive use strategy pada siswa laki-laki dan perempuan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alivernini, F., Manganelli, S., Cavicchiolo, E., Chirico, A., & Lucidi, F. (2019). The use of self-regulated cognitive strategies across students with different immigrant backgrounds and gender. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(5), 652-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918785072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918785072

Alivernini, F., Manganelli, S., Cavicchiolo, E., Girelli, L., Biasi, V., & Lucidi, F. (2018). Immigrant background and gender differences in primary students’ motivations toward studying. The Journal of Educational Research, 111, 603-6011. doi:10.1080/00220671.2017.1349073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1349073

Alucyana, A. (2021). Dinamika Psikologis Pembelajaran Blended Learning. Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology (JICOP), 1(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v1i2.8490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v1i2.8490

Cozby, P. C., Mar, R. A., & Rawn, C. D. (2016). Methods in behavioural research. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.

Curione, K., Uriel, F., Gründler, V., & Freiberg-Hoffmann, A. (2022). Assessment of learning strategies in college students: a brief version of the MSLQ. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 20(56). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Agustin-Freiberg-Hoffmann-2/publication/359659817_Assessment_of_learning_strategies_in_college_students_a_brief_version_of_the_MSLQ/links/62470af221077329f2e83822/Assessment-of-learning-strategies-in-college-students-a-brief-version-of-the-MSLQ.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v20i56.4736

Fauzan & Arifin, F. (2017). Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional “Profesionalisme Guru di Era Digital. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344361017.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5 eds. SAGE.

Frings, L., Wagner, K., Unterrainer, J., Spreer, J., Halsband, U., & Schulze-Bonhage, A. (2006). Gender-related differences in lateralization of hippocampal activation and cognitive strategy. Neuroreport, 17(4), 417-421. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203623.02082.e3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000203623.02082.e3

Gagne, R.M. (1974). The condition of learning and theory of instruction. Holt Renehart and Winston.

Gbollie, C. & Keamu, H.P. (2017). Student academic performance: The role of motivation, strategies, and perceived factors hindering Liberian junior and Senior High School students leaning. Education Research International, vol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2-17/1789084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1789084

Gravetter, F. J., Forzano, L. A. B., & Rakow, T. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences, 1st EMEA Edition. Cengage learning.

Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B., Forzano, L. A. B., & Witnauer, J. E. (2020). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.

Hidayah, I. N., Sa’Dijah, C., Subanji, & Sudirman. (2021, March). The students’ cognitive engagement in online mathematics learning in the pandemic Covid-19 era. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1, p. 040010). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043567

Irgatoğlu, A., Sarıçoban, A., Özcan, M., & Dağbaşı, G. (2022). Learner Autonomy and Learning Strategy Use before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(10), 6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106118

Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and adapting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM courses at an HBCU. Aera Open, 4(4), 2332858418809346. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346

Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H. J., Xu, K. M., Kirschner, P. A., & De Groot, R. H. (2021). The Relation Between Cognitively Measured Executive Functions and Reported Self-Regulated Learning Strategy Use in Adult Online Distance Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 641972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641972

Meijs, C., Neroni, J., Gijselaers, H. J., Leontjevas, R., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. (2019). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire part B revisited: New subscales for an adult distance education setting. The internet and higher education, 40, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.003

Melansari, O. (2021, September 15). Hybrid/blended learning, menjawab tantangan tatanan normal baru. Balai Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan DKI Jakarta. https://lpmpdki.kemdikbud.go.id/hybrid-blended-learning-menjawab-tantangan-tatanan-normal-baru/#:~:text=Sedangkan%20Hybrid%20learning%20adalah%20menggabungkan,(internet%20dan%20mobile%20learning).

Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematic achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child development, vol. 84 issue 4. https://doi.org/1.0.1.1.1.1/cdev.12036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036

Pertiwi, B. M. P. P. (2017). Identifikasi Kemampuan Kognitif Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Berdasarkan Gender Selama Kbm Dengan Penerapan Model Collaborative Learning. Undergraduate Thesis. Unpublished, Universitas Jember.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Puteri, R. R. (2013). Intervensi Self-Regulation Empowerment Program untuk meningkatkan regulasi diri pada siswa underachiever tipe if-then students. Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Simangunsong, S., & Panjaitan, J. (2022). Pengaruh model hybrid learning terhadap level kognitif pada mata kuliah fisika dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Fisikawan, 5(1), 39-46. http://jurnal.darmaagung.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpenelitianfisikawan/article/view/1318

Soemantri, D., Mccoll, G., & Dodds, A. (2018). Measuring medical students’ reflection on their learning: modification and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). BMC medical education, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1384-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1384-y

Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D., & Acee, T. W. (1987). LASSI (Learning and Study Strategies Inventory) Clearwater. FL: H & H Publishing Co.

Zhang, L. (2018). Gender differences in metacognitive and cognitive strategy use and reading test performance. In Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension (pp. 131-145). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325-1_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325-1_6

Zhou, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Psychometric Properties of the MSLQ-B for adult distance education in China. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 620564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620564

Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49-64). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Darmayanti, K. K. H. ., Kristiyani, V., Winata, E. Y., & Anggraini, E. (2023). Cognitive Strategy Use dan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama . Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology, 3(1s), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v3i1s.12341

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1s (2023): (Special Issue The 9th IIUCP). Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology (JICOP)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Copyrights of all materials published in Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology (JICOP) are freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. All of the remix, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.