Pemantapan Kompetensi Guru dalam Mendesain Penilaian dalam Mengimplementasi Merdeka Belajar
Abstract
Guru adalah kunci keberhasilan penerapan perubahan kurikulum di Indonesia. Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah untuk memberikan pengetahuan tentang penerapan atau tata cara penerapan kurikulum merdeka belajar secara optimal. Kegiatan ini berdasarkan hasil wawancara dengan kepala sekolah yang masih kebingungan dalam menerapkan kurikulum merdeka belajar, mulai dari pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran, dan media pembelajaran, pelaksanaan kegiatan belajar mandiri, dan penilaian kurikulum merdeka belajar. Guru sangat jarang mendapatkan pelatihan untuk meningkatkan kompetensi mengajar. Peserta kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah seluruh guru mata pelajaran, wakil kepala sekolah, dan kepala sekolah. Metode kegiatan ini berupa workshop yang diberikan langsung kepada kepala sekolah, wakil kepala sekolah, dan guru. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan 87% guru memahami cara penerapan kurikulum merdeka belajar dan mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran pada kurikulum mandiri. Para guru merasa senang bisa mengikuti kegiatan ini karena para guru kesulitan mendapatkan pelatihan langsung di sekolahnya
Downloads
References
Adnan, A., Suwandi, S., Nurkamto, J., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Teacher Competence in Authentic and Integrative Assessment in Indonesian Language Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12145a
Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The Instrument Development to Evaluate Local Curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11458a
Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum Research: Toward a Framework for “Research-based Curricula.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 35–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034927
Doherty, C., & Shield, P. (2012). Teachers’ Work in Curricular Markets: Conditions of Design and Relations Between the International Baccalaureate Diploma and the Local Curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(3), 414–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00596.x
Evans, R., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2004). Learning in practice Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. 328(May), 1–5.
Grier, A. S. (2005). Integrating needs assessment into career and technical curriculum development. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(1), 59–66.
Hadi, S., Andrian, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2019). Evaluation model for evaluating vocational skills programs on local content curriculum in Indonesia: Impact of educational system in Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(82), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.3
Hadi, S., Maisaroh, S., Hidayat, A., & Andrian, D. (2022). An Instrument Development to Evaluate Teachers’ Involvement in Planning the Schools’ Budgeting at Elementary Schools of Yogyakarta Province. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15260a
Hosp, J. L., Ford, J. W., Huddle, S. M., & Hensley, K. K. (2018). The Importance of Replication in Measurement Research: Using Curriculum-Based Measures With Postsecondary Students With Developmental Disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417727489
Logan, B., & Ed, D. (2015). Reviewing the value of self-assessments: Do they matter in the classroom ? Research in Higher Education Journal, 29(September), 1–11.
Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332–1361. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341375
Mistar, J. (2011). A Study of the Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment. TEFLIN Journal, 22(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V22I1/45-58
Mølstad, C. E. (2015). State-based curriculum-making : approaches to local curriculum work in Norway and Finland. 47(4), 441–461.
Setiawan, A., Mardapi, D., & Andrian, D. (2019). The Development of Instrument for Assessing Students’ Affective Domain Using Self-and Peer-Assessment Models. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 12, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12326a
Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of preservice and inservice teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467640
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2023-10-25
Published 2023-10-29
2.png)
.png)
