CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE MATHEMATICS LEARNING INDEPENDENCE INSTRUMENT FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS USING AIKEN’S V
Keywords:
Validity of content, instruments of learning independence, Aiken's VAbstract
This study examines the content validity of a mathematics learning independence instrument for junior high school students, developed based on five key dimensions: initiative, discipline, responsibility, time management, and problem solving. The instrument includes 20 items rated by four experts using a 1–5 Likert scale. Aiken's V index was used to measure expert agreement on item relevance. Results showed that 6 items had high validity (V ≥ 0.8125), 13 had moderate validity (0.5 ≤ V < 0.75), and 1 item had low validity (V = 0.375). The highest V score was 0.875, and the lowest was 0.375. These findings indicate that most items are acceptable but may require slight revision to better reflect the intended constructs. The study highlights the importance of expert input and the utility of Aiken’s V in validating instrument content. A valid instrument is essential for accurately assessing student learning independence, especially in junior high school mathematics education.
Downloads
References
[1] U. Cahyana, S. Supatmi, Erdawati, and Y. Rahmawati, “The influence of web-based learning and learning independence toward student’s scientific literacy in chemistry course,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12442a.
[2] E. Hasanah, A. Desstya, I. Kusumawati, A. Limba, and Kusdianto, “The Mediating Role of Student Independence on Graduate Quality in Distributed Learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.1524a.
[3] Maimun and Bahtiar, “Students’ Learning Independence and Critical Thinking Ability Using Mobile Learning Technology,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1815.
[4] A. Hasna, M. Maimunah, and E. Suanto, “Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Ability In Terms of Students’ Mathematical Learning Independence,” Mathline J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.31943/mathline.v8i3.465.
[5] P. Putra and M. Ikhsan, “Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Learning Independence of High School Students Through Problem Based Learning Model,” Int. J. Educ. Vocat. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1596.
[6] W. Ariyani, H. Suyitno, and I. Junaedi, “Mathematical connection ability and students’ independence in missouri mathematics project E-learning,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.
[7] F. Husna, “Influence Model of Learning PBL and CTL on the Ability of Thingking Critical Student Learning Mathematical and Independence Junior High School,” … J. Math. Educ. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, 2022.
[8] H. B. Prastami and K. Kartono, “Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in REACT Learning Assisted by Dynamic Assessment in Terms of Student Learning Independence,” Unnes J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.15294/ujme.v11i3.65156.
[9] H. Taherdoost, “Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument: How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/ Survey in a Research,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 28–36, 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205040.
[10] Y. F. Putri, K. Kadir, and A. Dimyati, “Analysis of Content Validity on Mathematical Computational Thinking Skill Test for Junior High School Student Using Aiken Method,” Hipotenusa J. Math. Soc., vol. 4, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i2.7465.
[11] M. Taqiudin and Ahmad, “Content Validity of Student Perception Instrument on School Educational Management,” J. Pract. Learn. Educ. Dev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2025, doi: 10.58737/jpled.v5i1.422.
[12] M. F. Baharuddin, M. N. Masrek, S. M. Shuhidan, M. H. bin H. Razali, and M. S. Rahman, “Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 11, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.46338/ijetae0721_09.
[13] E. Almanasreh, R. Moles, and T. F. Chen, “Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity,” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, vol. 15, no. 2. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.
[14] C. Merino-Soto, “Aiken’s V Coefficient: Differences in Content Validity Judgments,” MHSalud, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.15359/mhs.20-1.3.
[15] H. D. Gibbs, H. Bonenberger, H. R. Hull, D. K. Sullivan, and C. A. Gibson, “Validity of an updated nutrition literacy assessment instrument with the new nutrition facts panel,” Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1606167.
[16] M. S. B. Yusoff, “ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation,” Educ. Med. J., vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.
[17] D. Mulyono, “The influence of learning model and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes by controlling students’ early ability,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iejme/642.
[18] K. Khasanah and A. Lestari, “The Effect of Quizizz and Learning Independence on Mathematics Learning Outcomes,” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7288.
[19] Y. E. Patras, N. B. Sabti, T. Windiyani, and R. Hidayat, “The Effect of Learning Discipline on Independence Student Learning,” Pedago. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.33751/pedagonal.v5i2.3937.
[20] F. S. Fatimah, H. Asy’ari, A. Sandria, and J. A. Nasucha, “Learning fiqh based on the TAPPS (Think Aloud Pair Problem Solving) method in improving student learning outcomes,” At-Tadzkir Islam. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023.
[21] J. E. Fielding, Health program planning, implementation, and evaluation: creating behavioral, environmental, and policy change. JHU Press, 2022.
[22] D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, and L. K. Ngan, “The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 12, 2022.
[23] A. Fauzi and D. B. Widjajanti, “Self-regulated learning: The effect on student’s mathematics achievement,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1097, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012139.
[24] D. Eliserio, “Self-Regulated Learning And Mathematics Achivement In Fourth Grade Classroom,” Dordt Coll. J., vol. 27, no. 2, 2012.
[25] A. A. Nugroho, I. Dwijayanti, and R. E. Utami, “Exploration of self-regulated learning: Mathematical problem solving,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1869, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012110.
[26] Heri Retnawati, Validitas Reliabilitas & Karakteristik Butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publising, 2016.
[27] H. Retnawati, Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. 2016.
[28] L. R. Aiken, “Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 40, no. 4, 1980, doi: 10.1177/001316448004000419.
[29] N. Muliana, A. U. T. Pada, and C. Nurmaliah, “Content validity of conation assessment,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1460, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012057.
[30] D. M. Rubio, M. Berg-weger, S. S. Tebb, E. S. Lee, and S. Rauch, “Objectifying Content Validity: In Social Work Research,” Soc. Work Res., vol. 27, no. 2, 2003.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Ahmad, Mariano Dos Santos, Helmiyatun Helmiyatun, Nurul Hidayah, Parihin Parihin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright @Author. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Copyrights of all materials published in the Mathematics Research and Education Journal are freely available without charge to users or / institutions.
Accepted 2025-10-28
Published 2025-11-14
