Urgensi Ratifikasi Statuta Roma Bagi Indonesia

Penulis

  • Danel Aditia Situngkir Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing Prayoga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1548

Kata Kunci:

Urgency, Ratification, Rome Statute, Indonesia

Abstrak

The presence of permanent the International Criminal Court is a realization of the efforts of the international community to provide protection against human rights from extraordinary crimes against humanity. The court established under the Rome Statute has been ratified by 123 countries. Indonesia is not a country which ratified the Rome Statute which came into force on 1 July 2002. The issues to be discussed in this paper are the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court compared to the Indonesian Human Rights Court and the urgency of the roma statute in relation to sovereignty for Indonesia. The research method is done by normative juridical approach with data collection method through literature study which then analyzed as a legal issue to discuss urgency of ratification of roma statute for Indonesia. From the discussion it is concluded that the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is more complete than the Human Rights Court in Indonesia and the urgency of ratification of rome statute if associated with the sovereignty of the state should not be feared because the court only to complete as complementary principles in the statutes of Rome.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Buku-Buku
Amiruddin. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Ardhiwisastra, Y. B. (1999). Imunitas Kedaulatan Negara di Forum Pengadilan Negeri Asing. Bandung: Alumni.
Danel Aditia Situngkir. (2013). Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (International Criminal Court) Terhadap Negara Bukan Peserta Statuta Roma. Andalas.
Dendy Sugono, dkk. (2008). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Eddy OS Hiariej. (2010). Pengadilan atas Beberapa Kejahatan Serius Terhadap HAM. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Henry Campbell Black. (1968). Black’s Law Dictionary. ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.
Parthiana, I. W. (2006). Hukum Pidana Internasional (I). Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Romli Atmasasmita. (2004). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional (II). Jakarta: PT. Hecca Mitra Utama.

Jurnal dan Sumber Lain
Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Untuk Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. (1998). Draft Naskah Akademis dan Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Pengesahan ICC 1998 (Vol. 1998).
Markus Benzing. (2003). The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity. Max Planck Yearbook a/United Nations Law, 7, 2003.
Office of the Prosecutor ICC. (2013). Policy Paper on Preliminary Examinations. International Criminal Court.

Statuta/Perjanjian Internasional
United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969. In Treaty series (Vol. 1155, p. 331). https://doi.org/10.1163/157180309X451114
United Nations. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2187 Treaty Series § (1998). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1689616
UnitedNations. (1945). UN Charter (full text) | United Nations. 1945, 2017(January 1942), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/index.html

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2018-12-01

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles