https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/issue/feed UIR Law Review 2024-07-02T12:45:04+07:00 ME UIRLrev [email protected] Open Journal Systems <p style="text-align: justify;">UIR LAW REVIEW (<a href="http://issn.pdii.lipi.go.id/issn.cgi?daftar&amp;1461146018&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Online ISSN</a>: 2548-768X &amp; <a href="http://issn.pdii.lipi.go.id/issn.cgi?daftar&amp;1474853150&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Print ISSN</a>: 2548-7671) publishes scientific articles from various disciplines of law. The articles published in&nbsp;UIRLRev include the results of legal scientific research.&nbsp;UIRLRev was published by the&nbsp;<a href="http://law.uir.ac.id/">Faculty of Law</a> of the Universitas Islam Riau.&nbsp;UIRLRev accepts manuscripts or articles in the field of Law from various academics and researchers, both nationally and internationally. The articles contained in&nbsp;UIRLRev are articles that have been reviewed by peer-reviewers. The decision on the acceptance of a scientific article in&nbsp;UIRLRev shall be the right of the&nbsp;<a href="http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/about/editorialTeam" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Board of Editors</a> based on the recommendation of <a href="http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/reviewer">Peer-Reviewers</a>. UIRLRev indexed by&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=-6lCUZ0AAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Scholar</a>&nbsp;, <a href="https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/?query=UIR+Law+Review" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mendeley</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?lookfor=UIR+Law+Review&amp;name=&amp;oaboost=1&amp;newsearch=1&amp;refid=dcbasen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BASE</a> and&nbsp;<a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2548-768X?source=%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22filtered%22%3A%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22bool%22%3A%7B%22must%22%3A%5B%7B%22terms%22%3A%7B%22index.issn.exact%22%3A%5B%222548-7671%22%2C%222548-768X%22%5D%7D%7D%2C%7B%22term%22%3A%7B%22_type%22%3A%22article%22%7D%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22from%22%3A0%2C%22size%22%3A100%7D" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Directory of Open Access Journal</a> (DOAJ)</p> https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/17329 JURIDICAL STUDY OF BUSINESS COMPETITION LEGAL MEASURES IN CREATING A BALANCE BETWEEN INTERESTS BUSINESS MANUFACTURING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 2024-06-02T02:17:02+07:00 Rahmi Yuniarti [email protected] Cheny Berlian [email protected] <p><em>Business competition law and consumer protection law have relevance in that the positive impact that occurs from healthy competition impacts business actors and consumers, as well as the negative impact that occurs if there are monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Apart from business actors, consumers will also experience loss. The problem studied in this article is a Juridical Study of Legal Efforts for Business Competition in Creating a Balance Between the Interests of Business Actors and Consumer Protection. The approach method that will be used is normative juridical. This research is descriptive analytical in nature and the results of data processing are then analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Consumer rights are closely related to business competition. If unfair competition occurs and consumers become victims, consumers have the right to receive compensation. Consumers also have the right to receive appropriate advocacy, protection and efforts to resolve consumer protection disputes. It would be better if monopolistic practices and unfair business competition occur, consumers can immediately claim their rights in this case without needing to file a lawsuit for compensation again.&nbsp;</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><strong> : <em>Business Competition Law, Business Actors, Consumers</em></strong></p> 2024-04-10T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/13939 Politik Hukum Dan Asas Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ibu Kota Nusantara 2023-10-04T08:19:11+07:00 sarkowiv zahry [email protected] <p>Pengesahan UU IKN menjadi diskursus dan topik menarik yang selalu diperbincangkan baik melalui media<br />online, cetak dan elektronik maupun media sosial. Sejak awal kelahirannya, proses legislasi mulai tahapan<br />perencanaan, penyusunan, pembahasan, pengesahan atau penetapan sampai tahap pengundangan, tak<br />terlepas pro dan kontra dari berbagai kalangan khususnya terkait azas keterbukaan serta minimnya dalam<br />partisipasi publik. Tujuan artikel ini untuk mengetahui Politik Hukum Dan Asas Pembentukan Undang-<br />Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ibu Kota Nusantara. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian<br />yuridis normatif, dengan tiga pendekatan yang digunakan, Pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute<br />approach), Pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan Pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil<br />Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa proses pembentukan Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara dengan waktu<br />terbatas dan tergesa-gesa sehingga tidak sepenuhnya mengikuti kaidah pembentukan peraturan<br />perundang-undangan yang ada. Kaitannya dengan asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-<br />undangan yang baik kurang memperhatikan asas-asas kejelasan tujuan, asas dapat dilaksanakan, asas<br />kedayagunaan dan kehasilgunaan serta terutama asas keterbukaan dan partisipatif. Sementara, Politik<br />hukum pembentukan Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara secara formal memenuhi syarat, namun perspektif<br />sebagai produk politik dan konfigurasi politik secara substansial belum menggambarkan sebagai hasil<br />konfigurasi dari pemerintah yang demokratis, atau disebut pula produk hukum yang kurang responsif.<br />Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara secara substansial masih terdapat muatan-muatan yang belum secara<br />jelas diatur, sehingga bisa memperlambat pelaksanaan undang-undang tersebut</p> 2024-06-27T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/15691 APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN INSURANCE AGREEMENTS IN AN EFFORT TO PROVIDE LEGAL PROTECTION TO POLICY HOLDERS 2023-12-31T17:17:07+07:00 Selvi Harvia Santri [email protected] <p>Humans will always face risks that cause losses in carrying out their daily activities, both risks to property and life. The policy serves as written proof that insurance has occurred. In the case of taking out a policy, the position of the insurer will be stronger than that of the policy holder or insured so that injustice occurs, where in practice the policy has been prepared by the insurance company, so this brings benefits to the insurance company itself, the company has the right to determine the contents of the agreement, the party The insured is in a weak position because he does not participate in determining the contents of the agreement, so a form of legal protection is needed for the policy holder or insured (consumer). There is an imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties. So there is the potential for insurance companies to tend to protect their interests in such a way by setting a number of provisions that limit the rights of the insured so that the standard contract can become a unilateral clause</p> 2024-06-27T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/15855 Wanprestation In The Implementation Of The Griya Puri Husada Husada Housing Development Cooperation Agreement Between The Land Owner And The Developer 2024-01-10T21:51:36+07:00 Zulfikri Pohan [email protected] <p>The Griya Puri Husada housing development cooperation agreement is between the land<br>owner and the developer who has entered into a cooperation agreement and is stated in a<br>deed of cooperation agreement made before a Notary. Each party's rights and obligations<br>have been agreed upon by both parties and must be implemented as appropriate. The first<br>party is the owner of the plot of land and the second party is the developer who builds and<br>manages the housing. Every house sold from every house deal makes a profit. The second<br>party only completes the work until it is completed no later than 2 years even though after<br>that time period the land owner's rights have not been fulfilled. This research method is<br>legal research using empirical legal methods. Data sources were obtained from the first<br>party or land owner and the second party or developer as well as library data such as<br>statutory regulations, books, journals and articles related to research. This research was<br>carried out at the research location in the Griya Puri Husada housing complex. This paper<br>concludes that: (1). The implementation of the cooperation agreement did not run as it<br>should, the second party did not carry out the housing development as it should by building<br>and managing the construction within two years at the latest. (2). The second party also has<br>not paid the full amount to the first party or land owner. The second party or developer<br>experiences obstacles in the early stages such as permits and correspondence, as well as<br>finding consumers or buyers quickly.</p> 2024-06-27T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/16091 MENILIK HUBUNGAN BISNIS DALAM LINGKUP PEMILU DAN DEMOKASI INDONESIA 2024-01-23T10:34:06+07:00 ulfia Hasanah [email protected] <p><em>: Indonesia as a country that adheres to the ideology of constitutional democracy has provided opportunities for democracy through the provisions of article 96 of Law number 12 of 2011. That the community has the right and obligation to be involved in the formation of statutory regulations. The legal research method used in this paper is normative juridical research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The development of the business world in the 2024 election is certainly very important because it determines the direction of the economy in the coming year. Because this is the moment to maintain economic stability so that Indonesia can succeed in becoming a high-income country. With elections, the business world can be more conducive and smooth. The position of democracy is related to the social system that supports it and the political system or regime that uses it. Apart from containing universal elements (common denominator), democracy also contains contextual contents that are inherent in certain social and political systems.</em></p> 2024-06-27T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/16165 PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN HUKUM MENGENAI TINDAKAN ABORSI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN DAN KUHP NASIONAL 2024-01-27T14:45:06+07:00 Nurul Sapitri Sakir [email protected] Sunardi Purwanda [email protected] Phireri Phireri [email protected] Andi Musran [email protected] <p>Tindakan aborsi merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang diatur dalam berbagai peraturan<br />perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Indonesia, salah satunya adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009<br />tentang Kesehatan, atau disingkat UU Kesehatan. Selain UU Kesehatan, pengaturan mengenai aborsi juga<br />terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana atau<br />yang dikenal dengan sebutan KUHP. KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan<br />pengaturan terkait aborsi terhadap korban perkosaan menurut UU Kesehatan dan KUHP Nasional. Kitab<br />Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah<br />penelitian hukum normatif. hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah<br />pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. pendekatan perundang-undangan dan<br />pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa persamaan dan<br />perbedaan mengenai pengaturan hukum mengenai aborsi khususnya terhadap korban perkosaan. aborsi<br />khususnya terhadap korban perkosaan. Perbuatan aborsi dalam Undang-Undang Kesehatan diatur dalam<br />Pasal 75, 76, 77 dan 194 dengan ancaman pidana penjara paling lama 10 tahun dan denda paling banyak<br />Rp. 1.000.000.000,- (satu milyar rupiah), sedangkan aborsi dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana<br />diatur dalam pasal 463, 464 dan 465 dengan ancaman pidana penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun.</p> 2024-04-15T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 UIR Press