https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/issue/feed UIR Law Review 2020-06-04T11:15:43+00:00 Rahdiansyah lawreview@journal.uir.ac.id Open Journal Systems <p style="text-align: justify;">UIR LAW REVIEW (<a href="http://issn.pdii.lipi.go.id/issn.cgi?daftar&amp;1461146018&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_blank">Online ISSN</a>: 2548-768X &amp; <a href="http://issn.pdii.lipi.go.id/issn.cgi?daftar&amp;1474853150&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_blank">Print ISSN</a>: 2548-7671) publishes scientific articles from various disciplines of law. The articles published in&nbsp;UIRLRev include the results of legal scientific research.&nbsp;UIRLRev was published by the&nbsp;<a href="http://law.uir.ac.id/">Faculty of Law</a> of the Universitas Islam Riau.&nbsp;UIRLRev accepts manuscripts or articles in the field of Law from various academics and researchers, both nationally and internationally. The articles contained in&nbsp;UIRLRev are articles that have been reviewed by peer-reviewers. The decision on the acceptance of a scientific article in&nbsp;UIRLRev shall be the right of the&nbsp;<a href="http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/about/editorialTeam" target="_blank">Board of Editors</a> based on the recommendation of <a href="http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/reviewer">Peer-Reviewers</a>. UIRLRev indexed by&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=-6lCUZ0AAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">Google Scholar</a>&nbsp;, <a href="https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/?query=UIR+Law+Review" target="_blank">Mendeley</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?lookfor=UIR+Law+Review&amp;name=&amp;oaboost=1&amp;newsearch=1&amp;refid=dcbasen" target="_blank">BASE</a> and&nbsp;<a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2548-768X?source=%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22filtered%22%3A%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22bool%22%3A%7B%22must%22%3A%5B%7B%22terms%22%3A%7B%22index.issn.exact%22%3A%5B%222548-7671%22%2C%222548-768X%22%5D%7D%7D%2C%7B%22term%22%3A%7B%22_type%22%3A%22article%22%7D%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22from%22%3A0%2C%22size%22%3A100%7D" target="_blank">Directory of Open Access Journal</a> (DOAJ)</p> https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/3779 Koordinasi PT. Pegadaian (Persero) Dengan Direktorat Reserse Narkoba Polda Sumbar Dalam Penimbangan Barang Bukti Penyalahgunaan Narkotika 2020-06-04T11:14:58+00:00 Larensius Arliman S laurensiusarliman@gmail.com <p><em>Direktorat Narkoba Polda Sumatera Barat (Ditresnarkoba Polda Sumbar) untuk mengetahui berat barang bukti narkotika, maka penyidik harus melakukan penimbangan barang bukti yang bekerjasama dengan PT. Pegadaian. Hal ini berguna untuk menciptakan kerjasama agar mencegah dan pemberantasan penyalahgunaan dan peredaran gelap nerkotika di Sumatera Barat. Atas hal tersebut maka dibahas koordinasi yang dilakukan oleh Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti? Serta kendala apa saja yang dihadapi Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti? Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa koordinasi yang dilakukan oleh Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti adalah sebagai berikut: dalam kegiatan penimbangan berat barang bukti narkoba, wajib melampirkan surat permintaan penimbangan barang bukti narkoba dan setelah selesai penimbangan, wajib dibuatkan Berita Acara yang ditandatangani kedua belah pihak dengan diketahui dan disaksikan oleh saksi penyidik atau penyidik pembantu dan tersangka, demi kelancaran pelaksanaan penyidikan yang dilakukan, maka para pihak saling berkoordinasi, saling membantu dalam lingkup tugas dan kewenangan masing-masing. Kendala yang dihadapi adalah: kurangnya sarana dan prasarana, kurangnya personil penyidik narkoba, kurangnya pemahaman anggota kepolisian dalam melakukan timbangan di lapangan, kurangnya senjata dalam melakukan pengawalan, baik terhadap tersangka maupun barang bukti, saling terikatnya tiap pelaku, teknik peradaran narkotika yang berubah-rubah dan hari libur menjadi kendala dalam melakukan penimbangan. kendala di pegadaian.</em></p> 2020-03-06T07:33:55+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4132 Kewenangan Hakim Dalam Mengubah Klausul Kontrak Yang Dibuat Atau Dilaksanakan Dengan Itikad Buruk 2020-06-04T11:15:43+00:00 Timothee Kencono Malye timothee.malye@gmail.com Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah rahdiansyah@law.uir.ac.id <p>Para praktiknya kadangkala pihak-pihak yang terikat dalam sebuah kontrak tidak memiliki kedudukan yang seimbang, baik dari segi ekonomi, pengetahuan, maupun pengalaman. Hal ini menyebabkan potensi adanya klausul pada perjanjian yang merugikan salah satu pihak apabila ditinjau dari kacamata orang pada umumnya yang berakal sehat. Penulis berpendapat bahwa hakim tidak perlu ragu untuk membatalkan maupun mengubah klausul pada kontrak yang demikian, dengan didasari Pasal 1338 dan Pasal 1339 KUH Perdata maupun konsep <em>misbruik van omstandigheden</em>. Adapun mekanisme perubahan atau pembatalannya adalah dengan pengajuan gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum oleh Penasihat Hukum ataupun masyarakat pada umumnya. Penasihat Hukum pada khususnya harus menyadari hal ini untuk melindungi klien yang secara ekonomi dan pendidikan berada dalam posisi yang lebih lemah.</p> <p><em>Kata Kunci: Kontrak, Misbruik van omstandigheden, Itikad Buruk</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2020-03-06T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4463 Pelaksanaan Yurisdiksi Universal Terhadap Modern Piracy Jure Gentium 2020-06-04T11:14:19+00:00 Nadiyah Asfarosya nadiyah17001@mail.unpad.ac.id <p>This study aims to analyze the relevance of the approach of universal jurisdiction in law enforcement against the crime of modern pirates. This study looks at piracy itself which changes over time and the effectiveness of universal jurisdiction in minimizing back piracy that can affect the international community. This research is normative. The focus of this research is to find out if Universal jurisdiction can still be used in law enforcement against Modern Piracy. Universal jurisdiction has long been in law enforcement against piracy. However, turning the numbers of countries implementing universal jurisdiction raises the question of what constitutes an obstacle to implementing universal jurisdiction over the crime of piracy. In addition, several solutions have emerged that are considered more effective in enforcing the law against modern piracy in order to prevent the culture of impunity.</p> 2020-03-06T07:43:34+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4571 Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Polis Asuransi Jiwa Terhadap Penetapan Klausula Baku 2020-06-04T11:13:39+00:00 Selvi Harvia Santri selviharviasantri@law.uir.ac.id Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah rahdiansyah@law.uir.ac.id <p>The agreement that occurred between the insurance company and the insured was outlined in the policy. The insurance policy is standard or standard, meaning that the policy has been issued in advance by the insurance company. According to the provisions of the policy or form of insurance agreement with any name, the following attachments may not contain different words or interpretations, but in reality the policies issued by insurance companies contain languages ‚Äč‚Äčthat contain different interpretations by the parties resulting in the rejection of the claims submitted by the insured or the holder policy. The issues raised in this paper are how is the standard contract arrangements for life insurance policies in Indonesia and how is the form of legal protection of policy holders for the application of life insurance policy standard clauses in Indonesia? The research method used is empirical juridical by conducting field observations through interviews to the parties later Interview results are analyzed in accordance with insurance regulations in Indonesia. The purpose of this paper is to find out the rules governing standard life insurance contracts in Indonesia and to find out the form of legal protection for policy holders against the application of a standard life insurance policy clause in Indonesia. Standard contract arrangements in Indonesia are regulated based on OJK Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection and Government Regulation No. 73 of 1992 Article (19), and Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance Business, while the form of legal protection of policyholders in applying standard contracts to life insurance policy is an insurance company responsible for providing compensation if a claim is claimed by the insured, which has fulfilled the provisions in the life insurance policy, if it raises a dispute the insured is entitled to settle a dispute through a mediation institution based on Article 54 CHAPTER XI of Law number 40 concerning Insurance namely regarding the legal protection of policyholders, for the insured and insurance companies.</p> 2020-03-06T07:53:10+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4384 Presentase Dan Jaringan Korupsi Angelina Sondakh Pada Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Agung No 1616kPis.Sus2013 2020-06-04T11:12:58+00:00 Anang Setiawan ananggsetiawan2016@gmail.com Achmad Nurmandi ananggsetiawan2016@gmail.com <p>The rise of corruption cases that occur in Indonesia today, if we see corruption cases in Indonesia every year is always increasing, not decreasing, this causes people to feel angry with corruptors. The percentage and network of corruption Angelina Sondakh of the Supreme Court Judge's Decision No. 1616k / Pis.Sus / 2013 is quite interesting to examine especially if we can see who the dominant actors are in this case, both from the planning process, the bidding process, the bid evaluation process, and implementation and evaluation. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach which illustrates the phenomenon of Angelina sondakh corruption case in the Supreme Court's Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013. Descriptive analysis in this study uses the Nvivo 12 Plus software. Data from this study were sourced from the Supreme Court Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 and previous research relating to the Corruption of Angelina Sondakh. The results of this discussion The conclusions that the author can take from the presentation of the analysis above are based on the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 analyzed with Nvivo 12 Plus in general from the four processes above can be seen Corporate 9.05%, Government 7.62%, Political Parties 0.32% and Political Consultants 0%.</p> <p><strong><em>Keyword: Corruption; Bribery; Network</em></strong></p> 2020-03-06T07:57:01+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4279 Problematics Violence in Household Reviewed From Viewpoint Criminology and Victimology 2020-03-30T10:15:12+00:00 Dwi Seno Wijanarko dwi.seno@ubharajaya.ac.id Fransiska Novita Eleanora siska_ita@yahoo.com <p>Domestic violence is an increasingly widespread problem, and is often triggered or caused by a variety of things, but the most prominent is economic problems or primary needs. Perpetrators as people who commit violence can be reviewed why to do it, due to several factors in him, such as the environment, heredity, psychiatric disturbed so that in solving household problems is often done with high emotions and full of inappropriate words spoken to the interlocutor. While the victim as the party suffering due to the treatment given by the perpetrator must also be seen, the perception of the victim as a weak party, the victims here based on the type there are victims who really want themselves to be victims, there are victims who are truly themselves victims, exploited by the perpetrators, where violence there are various forms of physical, psychological, sexual violence and neglect of the household, this is seen when viewed from the perception of criminology and victimization. The research method used is normative juridical that is by tracing the literature and legislation relating to the problem under study. The result is that the perpetrators of domestic violence are seen from the aspect of the perpetrators' responsibilities regarding their age to be able to punish and sanction, the victims see their role when the crime is related to the loss suffered, and the settlement of the household according to the law on the elimination of violence in the household namely number 23 of 2004, namely by preventing the occurrence of criminal acts, protecting victims, providing emergency assistance, assisting the process of determining the application for protection.</p> 2020-03-06T08:01:15+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 UIR Law Review