Why Economic Domestic Violence Remains Underenforced in Indonesian Criminal Law?

Tria Putri Kismala; Rindiyanih Rindiyanih; Muhamad Bagas Perdana; Sulaiman Kareemullah Akbar; Valerio Sebastian

doi:10.25299/uirlrev.2026.vol10(1).25734

Authors

Tria Putri Kismala Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Rindiyanih Rindiyanih Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Muhamad Bagas Perdana Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Sulaiman Kareemullah Akbar Faculty of Law, Monash University
Valerio Sebastian Sociedad Civil de Derecho y Políticas Públicas (SOCIPOL), Barcelona / 4 CASA Asia, Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2026.vol10(1).25734

Keywords:

Economic Violence, Domestic Violence, Article 9 PDKRT Law, Indonesian Criminal Law, Gender-Based Violence

Abstract

Economic violence within domestic settings has increasingly been recognized as a critical yet underexplored dimension of domestic violence. While international frameworks, including the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (1993), acknowledge violence in both physical and non-physical forms, economic abuse remains insufficiently regulated and underreported in Indonesia. This conceptual article examines the nature, forms, and legal implications of economic domestic violence, conceptualizing it as a mechanism of coercive control and power imbalance within intimate relationships. Using normative legal analysis supported by international literature, the study evaluates the definition, structural impacts, and legal treatment of economic violence in Indonesian criminal law. Particular attention is given to Article 9 of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PDKRT Law), which criminalizes economic neglect and financial deprivation within households. The findings indicate that, despite explicit statutory recognition, economic violence remains underenforced due to limited legal awareness, socio-cultural norms that treat household financial matters as private, and substantial evidentiary difficulties in proving economic dependency and financial control. Enforcement is further constrained by narrow interpretative practices among law enforcement authorities. This article contributes to the literature by reconceptualizing economic domestic violence as an autonomous form of coercive control, critically assessing doctrinal and evidentiary limitations of Article 9 in practice, and highlighting the need for a victim-centered interpretative framework. The study concludes that strengthening legal literacy, judicial sensitivity, and public awareness is essential to enhance protection and ensure the effective implementation of domestic violence legislation in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, Adrienne E., Cris M. Sullivan, Deborah Bybee, and Megan R. Greeson. “Development of the Scale of Economic Abuse.” Violence Against Women 14, no. 5 (2008): 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315529.

Adams, Adrienne E., Megan R. Greeson, Angela K. Littwin, and Megan Javorka. “The Revised Scale of Economic Abuse (SEA2): Development and Initial Psychometric Testing.” Psychology of Violence 10, no. 2 (2020): 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000242.

Adams, Megan E. “Assuring Financial Stability for Survivors of Domestic Violence: A Judicial Remedy for Coerced Debt in New York’s Family Courts.” Brooklyn Law Review 84, no. 4 (2019): 8.

Agustin, Aisah. “The Protection of Women as a Victim of Domestic Violence in Indonesia based on CEDAW and Law Number 23 of 2004. Thesis. (Yogyakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2017).

Aisyah, Siti, and Lyn Parker. “Problematic Conjugations: Women’s Agency, Marriage and Domestic Violence in Indonesia.” Asian Studies Review 38, no. 2 (2014): 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2014.899312

Alfitri, Alfitri. “Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Socio-Legal Approach to CEDAW Bill in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 27, no. 2 (2020).

Aminah, Siti, Elizabeth Kristi Poerwandari, and Mariska Putri. “Children, Justice, and Femicide: Assessing Victim Rights in Indonesia’s Legal System.” Unnes Law Journal 11, no. 1 (2025): 1-26.

Antai, Diddy, Justina Antai, and David Steven Anthony. “The relationship between socio-economic inequalities, intimate partner violence and economic abuse: A national study of women in the Philippines.” Global Public Health 9, no. 7 (2014): 808-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.917195

Ashworth, Andrew. Principles of Criminal Law. 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik Gender Indonesia 2024. (Jakarta: BPS, 2024).

Bahtiar, Kemal Rafli, et al. “Protecting Domestic Workers: The Urgency of Legal Reform." Lex Favor Reo 1, no. 1 (2025): 67-82. https://doi.org/10.26740/lfr.v1i1.42825

Barak, Gregg. Violence and Nonviolence: Pathways to Understanding. (London: SAGE, 2003).

Branigan, Elizabeth. “'Who Pays in the End?': The Personal and Political Implications of Financial Abuse of Women in Intimate Partner Relationships.” Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy 44 (2007): 31-36. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.532660156571328

Byrt, Adrienne, and Kay Cook. “Mapping Gendered Economic Abuse Across the Relationship Lifecourse: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography.” Journal of Family Violence (2025): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-00872-7

Choirinnisa, Shafa Amalia. “Law and Society Approach on Legal Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence.” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review 2, no. 2 (2022): 227-248.

Christy, Kameri, et al. “Economic Abuse: A Subtle but Common Form of Power and Control.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37, no. 1-2 (2022): 473-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520916264;

Coker, Donna. “Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law: A Critical Review.” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 4, no. 2 (2001): 801-860. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2001.4.2.801

Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Committee). General Recommendation No. 35 on Gender-Based Violence against Women, Updating General Recommendation No. 19. (Geneva: United Nations, 2017).

Connell, R. W. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987).

Council of Europe. Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention). (Istanbul: Council of Europe, 2011).

Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43, no. 6 (1991): 1241–1299.

Cross, Cassandra, Molly Dragiewicz, and Kelly Richards. “Understanding Romance Fraud: Insights From Domestic Violence Research.” The British Journal of Criminology 58, no. 6 (2018): 1303-1322. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy005

Domestic Abuse Commissioner. Safety Before Status: The Solutions. (London: Domestic Abuse Commissioner for England and Wales, 2021).

Eriksson, Marie, and Rickard Ulmestig. ““It’s not all about money”: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of financial abuse in the context of VAW.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36, no. 3-4 (2021): 1625-1651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517743547

Fakhri, Rayyan, and Azhari Yahya. “The Protection of Women as the Victim of Economic Abuse Under International Human Rights Law in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan 3, no. 4 (2019): 727-738.

Fawole, Olufunmilayo I. “Economic Violence to Women and Girls: Is It Receiving the Necessary Attention?.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 9, no. 3 (2008): 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838008319255

Fineman, Martha Albertson. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. (New York: New Press, 2004).

Goodmark, Leigh. Decriminalizing Domestic Violence: A Balanced Policy Approach to Intimate Partner Violence. (Oakland: University of California Press, 2018).

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016).

Herawati, Dyah Syifa, et al. “Dynamics and Effectiveness of Domestic Violence Law in Indonesia (Law No. 23 of 2004 on the elimination of domestic violence).” Dauliyah: Journal of Islam and International Affairs 9, no. 2 (2024): 53-66.

Hertanto, Iwan, et al. “Police and Law Enforcement of Domestic Violence Crimes Based on Human Rights in Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 6, no. 2 (2024): 134-144.

Johnson, Michael P. A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence. (New Hampshire: University Press of New England, 2012).

Jury, Ang, Natalie Thorburn, and Ruth Weatherall. ““What’s his is his and what’s mine is his”: Financial power and the economic abuse of women in Aotearoa.” Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 29, no. 2 (2017): 69-82. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.337827159917887

Kasim, Nur Moh, and Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba. “Implementation of Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 1, no. 1 (2019): 147-156. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i1.22803

Kelly, Liz, and Nicole Westmorland. “Naming and Defining ‘Domestic Violence’: Lessons from Research with Violent Men.” Feminist Review 112, no. 1 (2016): 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.52

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia (KPPPA). Pedoman Perlindungan Perempuan Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. (Jakarta: KPPPA, 2021).

Kismala, Tria Putri, and Muhamad Bagas Perdana. “Kekerasan Ekonomi dalam Rumah Tangga: Kajian Hukum Pidana Pasal 9 UU 23 Tahun 2004.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Keuangan Modern 9, no. 4 (2025).

Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan (Komnas Perempuan). Catatan Tahunan tentang Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan 2024. (Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan, 2024).

Liedgren, Pernilla, Marie Eriksson, and Helena Blomberg. “Protocol for a Qualitative Study on Household Economic Discourses: From Everyday Talk About Money to Economic Abuse and the Financial Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 24 (2025): 16094069251369294. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251369294

Mahfud, Mahfud, and Rizanizarli Rizanizarli. “Domestic Violence Against Women in Indonesia: The Recent Domestic Violence Elimination Law Analysis.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 4 (2021): 385-398.

Mañas, Carmen, María A. Martínez, and Francisca Burgueño. “Intimate Partner Violence in Vulnerable Contexts: A Case Study.” Societies 13, no. 3 (2023): 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030053

Mas’udah, Siti. “Power Relations of Husbands and Wives Experiencing Domestic Violence in Dual-Career Families in Indonesia.” Millennial Asia 14, no. 1 (2023): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211039730

Mellar, Brooklyn M., et al. “Economic Abuse by An Intimate Partner and Its Associations with Women’s Socioeconomic Status and Mental Health.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 39, no. 21-22 (2024): 4415-4437. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241235140

Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–896.

Merry, Sally Engle. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Meyersfeld, Bonita. Domestic Violence and International Law. (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010).

Moe, Angela M., and Myrtle P. Bell. “Abject Economics: The Effects of Battering and Violence on Women’s Work and Employability.” Violence Against Women 10, no. 1 (2004): 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203256016

Nabila, Zahwa, and Arrie Budhiartie. “Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Kekerasan Pada Perempuan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.” Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 4, no. 1 (2025): 54-69. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v4i1.78

New Zealand. Family Violence Act 2018. (Wellington: New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office, 2018).

Postmus, Judy L., et al. “Economic Abuse as an Invisible Form of Domestic Violence: A Multicountry Review.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 21, no. 2 (2020): 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018764160

Postmus, Judy L., et al. “Understanding Economic Abuse in the Lives of Survivors.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27, no. 3 (2012): 411-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511421669

Postmus, Judy L., Sarah M. Stylianou, Cristina McMahon, and Anne E. Plummer. “Measuring Economic Abuse in the Lives of Survivors: Revisiting the Scale of Economic Abuse.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 35, no. 1–2 (2020): 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215610012

Pratama, Adi, Suwarno Abadi, and Nur Hidayatul Fithri. “Keadilan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Sebagai Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra 1, no. 2 (2023): 148-159. https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.105

Puspawati, Ani Agus, Bambang Utoyo, and Yudha Suchmasasi. “Analysis of the Implementation of Domestic Violence Prevention in Indonesia.” Sosiohumaniora 25, no. 3 (2023): 379-392. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i3.42362

Rafferty, Yvonne. “International Dimensions of Discrimination and Violence against Girls: A Human Rights Perspective.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 14, no. 1 (2013): 1-23.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009).

Rajendran, Pavithra. ““Economic Abuse” as an Element of Domestic Violence Against Women: A Comparative Analysis of Sri Lanka and United Kingdom.” Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law 15, no. 2 (2025): 210.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana). (Jakarta: State Secretariat, 1981).

Republic of Indonesia. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage (Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan). (Jakarta: State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, 1974).

Republic of Indonesia. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence (Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga). Jakarta: State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, 2004.

Republic of Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum. (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2017). Available online at https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/perma-nomor-3-tahun-2017/detail

Santoso, Mochamad Agus Rizal Dwi. “Analisis Pasal 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Thesis. (Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2022).

Schneider, Elizabeth M. Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).

Sedziafa, Alice Pearl, et al. “Women’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Economic Abuse in the Eastern Region of Ghana.” Journal of Family Issues 38, no. 18 (2017): 2620-2641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16686137

Sharp-Jeffs, Nicola. “Understanding the Economics Of Abuse: An Assessment of the Economic Abuse Definition Within the Domestic Abuse Bill.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence 5, no. 1 (2021): 163-173.

Sharp-Jeffs, Nicola. A Review of Research and Policy on Financial Abuse within Intimate Partner Relationships. (London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University, 2015).

Sibarani, Sabungan. “Prospek Penegakan Hukum Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (UU PKDRT).” Jurnal HAM 7, no. 1 (2016): 1-9.

Singh, Supriya. “Economic Abuse and Family Violence Across Cultures: Gendering Money and Assets Through Coercive Control.” Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal Law. (Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020), pp. 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_3

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014).

Stark, Evan. Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).

Stylianou, Amanda M. “Economic Abuse Experiences and Depressive Symptoms among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.” Journal of Family Violence 33, no. 6 (2018): 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9973-4

Tamanaha, Brian Z. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Tolmie, Julia, Rachel Smith, and Denise Wilson. “Understanding Intimate Partner Violence: Why Coercive Control Requires a Social and Systemic Entrapment Framework.” Violence Against Women 30, no. 1 (2024): 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231205585

True, Jacqui. The Political Economy of Violence against Women. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

UN Women. Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The Gender Snapshot 2022. (New York: UN Women, 2022).

United Kingdom. Domestic Abuse Act 2021. (London: The Stationery Office, 2021).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Handbook on Effective Prosecution Responses to Violence against Women and Girls. (Vienna: United Nations, 2014).

United Nations Women. Handbook for National Action Plans on Violence against Women. (New York: UN Women, 2012).

United Nations. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women Proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 48/104 of 20 December 1993. Available online at https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/eliminationvaw.pdf

United Nations. Handbook for Legislation on Violence against Women. (New York: United Nations, 2010).

United Nations. In-Depth Study on All Forms of Violence against Women: Report of the Secretary-General. (New York: United Nations, 2006).

Voth Schrag, Rachel J. “Experiences of Economic Abuse in the Community: Listening to Survivor Voices.” Affilia 34, no. 3 (2019): 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919851142

Voth Schrag, Rachel J., Sarah R. Robinson, and Kristen Ravi. “Understanding Pathways within Intimate Partner Violence: Economic Abuse, Economic Hardship, and Mental Health.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 28, no. 2 (2019): 222-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1546247

Walby, Sylvia. Theorizing Patriarchy. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).

Wangmann, Jane. “Coercive Control as the Context for Intimate Partner Violence: The Challenge for the Legal System.” Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal Law. (Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020), pp. 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_11

Wantu, Fence M., and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson. “Legal Protection of Women as Victim of Domestic Violence.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 1, no. 2 (2020): 243-258. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.22846

Weissman, Deborah M. “The Personal Is Political--and Economic: Rethinking Domestic Violence.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2007, no. 2 (2007): 387-450.

Wicaksono, Sonny Saptoajie, Gabrielle Poetri Soebiakto, and Ridwan Arifin. “Legal Aid for the Victims of Domestic Violence: Problems and Challenges.” The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 3, no. 2 (2021): 139-150.

World Bank. Women, Business and the Law 2023. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023).

World Health Organization. Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018: Global, Regional and National Prevalence Estimates for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women. World Health Organization, 2021.