A Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara  Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan: Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan

Joni Aprizal; Marlinah

doi:10.25299/uirlrev.2025.vol9(2).25476

Authors

Joni Aprizal Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, SH
Marlinah Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, S.H.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2025.vol9(2).25476

Keywords:

Disparitas, Penggelapan dalam jabatan

Abstract

The research aims to examine the causes of disparity and the basis for judges' considerations in deciding cases of Embezzlement in Office with a focus on Decision Number: 31/Pid.B/2024/PN Bgl, Decision Number: 161/Pid.B/2024/PN Bgl and Decision Number 396/Pid.B/2024/PN Bgl. This research uses a normative juridical approach based on law, theories, principles and legal concepts. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the Defendant's actions fulfill the elements of Article 374 of the Criminal Code concerning embezzlement in office and the factors that cause disparity in judges' decisions are as follows: a. Factors of power and freedom of judges, b. Factors of evidence in court, c. Factors of judges' considerations in giving decisions, which consist of legal considerations and non-legal considerations, and d. Factors of uncertainty in sentencing guidelines

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami Chazawi. Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2016.

Adami Chazawi. Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018

Andrisman, Tri. Hukum Pidana: Asas-Asas Dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Hukum Pidana. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2009.

Andi Hamzah. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta Sinar Grafika, 2017;

Ashibly, M. (2024). Buku Panduan Penulisan Tugas Akhir. Bengkulu: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, S.H.

Bambang W. S., "Peran Jaksa dalam Penyusunan Tuntutan Pidana", Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020;

Black, Henry Campbell. Handbook on the Construction and Interpretation of the Laws. St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co., Second Edition

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Khusnul Khofifah dan Yusron Marzuki, “Ratio Decidendi Putusan 99/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.PNG Nomor Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Golongan I Bagi Diri Sendiri”, Indonesia Journal of Law and Social Political Governance Vol. 3, No. 1, (2023).

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penyelesaian Tata Permohonan Cara dan Pemberian Restitusi dan Kompensasi Kepada Korban Tindak Pidana

Suyuthi, M. W. (2018). Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Wahyuni, W. (2024). Pembuktian Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata. www.Hukumonline.com.