Machine Acting and Contract Law – The Disruptive Factor of Artificial Intelligence for the Freedom Concept of the Private Law

  • Stefan Koos Universität der Bundeswehr München
Keywords: private autonomy, artificial intelligence, disruption

Abstract

Technologic evolutions of the last two decades, such as the development of the  internet, had a strong disruptive effect to the society and the economy. However, because of the flexible concepts of the civil law codifications a disruptive effect in the private law until now did not exist. Especially the legal consequences  of the internet were integrated into the private law without bigger categorial or structural changes. This applies equally to most of the cases of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent times. With more advanced development of AI-systems, though, it may not be possible anymore to apply the traditional terms of the private law to the use of AI without leaving the constitutional law background of the private law. This article discusses the impact of the use of a future advanced independent AI on the concept of the private autonomy in the contract law. Furthermore, it gives an overview on the new legislative approach of a human centric use of AI in the European Union. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asimov, Isaac, I Robot, 1950, New York.

Fezer, Karl-Heinz, Teilhabe und Verantwortung – Die personale Funktionsweise des subjektiven Privatrechts, 1986, C.H.Beck, Munich.

Fezer, Karl-Heinz, Einleitung UWG, in: Karl-Heinz Fezer et al. (ed.), Lauterkeitsrecht (UWG), 3rd ed. 2016, C.H.Beck, Munich.

Flume, Werner, Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts (Das Wesen der Willenserklärung und des Rechtsgeschäfts), 1975, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.

von Gierke, Otto, Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung, 1887, Weidmann, Berlin.

von Gierke, Otto, Deutsches Privatrecht, 1895, Verlag von Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig.

Dornis, Tim W., Künstliche Intelligenz als „Erfinder“ – Perspektiven der Disruption im Patentrecht, Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, 111(10), 2020, p. 436-446 (part 1) and p. 477-485 (part 2).

Flume, Werner, Gesellschaft und Gesamthand, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht, 136, 1972, p. 177-207.

Grapentin, Justin, Die Erosion der Vertragsgestaltungsmacht durch das Internet und den Einsatz Künstlicher Intelligenz, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 72(4), 2019, p. 181-185.

Gutmann, Thomas, Theories of Contract and the Concept of Autonomy, Preprints and Working Papers of the Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics 55, Münster/Germany, 2013, https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/kfg-normenbegruendung/intern/publikationen/gutmann/55_gutmann_-_contract_and_autonomy.pdf (30.11.2020).

Kersten, Jens, Menschen und Maschinen – Rechtliche Konturen instrumenteller, symbiotischer und autonomer Konstellationen, Juristen Zeitung, 70(1), 2015, p. 1-8.

Kessler, Oliver, Intelligente Roboter – Neue Technologien im Einsatz – Voraussetzungen und Rechtsfolgen des Handelns informationstechnischer Systeme, Multimedia und Recht, 20(9), 2017, p. 589-594.

Koos, Stefan, Artificial Intelligence – Science Fiction and Legal Reality, Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(3), 2018, p. 23-29.

Koos, Stefan, Artificial Intelligence as Disruptive Factor in the Civil Law: Impact of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Liability, Contracting, Competition Law and Consumer Protection Law with particular reference to the German and Indonesian Legal Situation, Yuridica, 36(1), 2021, p. 235-262.

Koszowski, Maciej, Analogical Reasoning in Statutory Law, J forensic Res, 8(2), 2017, DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.1000372

Langenbucher, Katja, Argument by Analogy in European Law, Cambridge Law Journal, (57)3, Nov. 1998, p. 481-521.

Mohammadi Zanjireh, Morteza/Karganejad, Ali/Tayebi, M.A., Virtual Enterprise Security: Importance, Challenges and Solutions, Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Tenerife/Spain, Dec. 16-^18, 2006, p. 536-542, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255599362_Virtual_Enterprise_Security_Importance_Challenges_and_Solutions (30.11.2020).

Savelyev, Alexander, Contract Law 2.0: “Smart” Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law, Social Science Research Network, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 14. December 2016, SSRN 2885241, https://wp.hse.ru/data/2016/12/14/1111743800/71LAW2016.pdf (30.11.2020).

Schirmer, Jan-Erik, Rechtsfähige Roboter?, Juristen Zeitung, 71(13), 2016, p. 660-666.

Qusthan Firdaus, Is Artificial Intelligence Subject to Ethic?, The Jakarta Post, 6. October 2018.

European Parliament Resolution of 16. February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, 2015/2103INL, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html (30.11.2020).

White Paper of the European Commission on Artificial Intelligence; A European Approach to Excellence and Trust, 19. February 2020, COM(2020) 65 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:65:FIN (30.11.2020).

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Artificial Intelligence for Europe, 25. April 2018, COM(2018) 237 final, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2018/EN/COM-2018-237-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF (30.11.2020).

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence, 8. April 2019, COM(2019) 168 final, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2019/EN/COM-2019-168-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF (30.11.2020).

Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, rapporteur MEP Ibán García de Blanco, 2020/2012(INL), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-650508_EN.pdf (30.11.2020).

Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence, rapporteur Axel Voss, 2020/2014(INL), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0178_EN.html (30.11.2020).

Intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies, rapporteur Stéphane Séjourné, 2020/2015(INI), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0176_EN.html (30.11.2020).

Position paper on behalf of Denmark, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland, France Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden, Innovative and Trustworthy AI: Two Sides of the Same Coin, https://www.vlada.cz/scripts/file.php?id=275575 (30.11.2020).

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679 (30.11.2020).

Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Gesetzes gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen für ein fokussiertes, proaktives und digitales Wettbewerbsrecht 4.0 und anderer wettbewerbsrechtlicher Bestimmungen (GWB-Digitalisierungsgesetz – Draft of an Antitrust Digitalization Act), Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/23492 (19.10.2020), https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/234/1923492.pdf (30.11.2020).

Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (US), https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=1.80&full=true (30.11.2020).

Published
2021-04-25
Abstract viewed = 133 times
PDF downloaded = 94 times