The Philosophical Dilemma of the Implementation of Justice Theory: Problems in Utilizing Land Rights between the Amungme Indigenous Tribe and PT Freeport Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhammad Bintang Pratama
  • Muhammad Adib Afiq Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Novita Ratna Cindi F Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Savira Auril Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(2).6081

Keywords:

Philosophical Dilemma, Theory of Justice, Land Ownership, Amungme Indigenous Tribe, PT Freeport Indonesia.

Abstract

This study analyzes the philosophical dilemma of the implementation of the theory of justice, the problem of the use of land rights between the Amungme Indigenous Tribe and PT Freeport Indonesia. This research is normative legal research using secondary data sources through prescriptive literature studies. The results show that there are problems in the use of land ownership rights; there are contradictions in the use of reasons for claiming ownership rights over the disputed land. The Amungme Adat tribe adheres to the theory of natural law with concrete implementation in the form of traditional customs which considers disputed land as ancestral heritage land, which is the absolute right of the Amungme Adat tribe. Meanwhile, PT Freeport Indonesia uses positivist legal theory with concrete implementation in the form of the use of Contract of Work and Agreement as positive law which is used as a strong basis for claiming ownership rights over the disputed land. In this research, we will discuss the philosophical dilemma of the implementation of the theory of justice comprehensively, the problem of the use of land rights between the Amungme Indigenous Tribe and PT Freeport Indonesia based on the use of the theory of justice. The limitation of this research lies in the study using literature data sources without empirical research. In the future, it is hoped that similar research can use this research as an essential reference in conducting research that can obtain factual data in the field so that it can provide more accurate results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Belum Bayar Ganti Rugi, Suku Amungme Kembali Gugat PT Freeport”. The Global Review: Pemandu Informasi Perkembangan Dunia. https://theglobal-review.com/belum-bayar-ganti-rugi-suku-amungme-kembali-gugat-pt-freeport/

Addi M. Idham.. 2017. “Tokoh Suku Amungme Desak Freeport Pulihkan Tanah Adatnya”. Tirto.id https://tirto.id/tokoh-suku-amungme-desak-freeport-pulihkan-tanah-adatnya-cj7Y

Adrianus Bintang Hanto Nugroho. 2014. “Kekuatan Modal dan Perilaku Kekerasan Negara pada Masa Orde Baru dan Pasca Orde Baru: Studi Kasus Freeport”. E-Journal Cakrawala Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Volume 3 Nomor 1 Tahun 2014. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Al Araf, Anton Aliabbas, dkk. 2011. Sekuritisasi Papua: Implikasi Pendekatan Keamanan terhadap Kondisi HAM di Papua. Jakarta: Imparsial.

Amirrudin dan Aderito Jesus de Soares. 2003. Perjuangan Amungme Antara Freeport dan Militer. Jakarta: ELSAM.

Anggun P. Situmorang. 2018. “Sejarah Freeport Indonesia Hingga Jadi Rebutan Negara Maju”. Merdeka.com issude 21 Desember 2018. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/sejarah-freeport-indonesia-hingga-jadi-rebutan-negara-maju.html

P. Parlindungan.1998. Komentar Atas UUPA. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Dewi Aryani. 2011. “Kasus Freeport Hilangnya Nurani Pemerintah”. AntaraNews.com issued 26 November 2011. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/286476/kasus-freeport-hilangnya-nurani-pemerintah

Dianto Bachriadi. 2017. Siapa Pemilik dan Pengguna Tanah? Akar-Akar Konflik Agraria dan Pelanggaran HAM pada Pertambangan Besar di Indonesia. Jakarta: Agrarian Resources Center.

Elza Syarief. 2012. Menuntaskan Sengketa Tanah Melalui Pengadilan Khusus Pertanahan. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Popular Gramedia.

Indra Nugraha. 2017. “Soal Penguasaan Lahan Freeport di Papua, Berikut Kata Komnas HAM”. Mongabay: Situs Berita Lingkungan. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/02/27/soal-penguasaan-lahan-freeport-di-papua-berikut-kata-komnas-ham/

I Nyoman Nurjaya, “Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Berbasis Masyarakat Hukum Adat perspektif Antropologi Hukum”, (makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Pemberdayaan Hukum Tidak Tertulis Dalam Grand Design Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, BPHN Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, 27 Juni 2019).

Kartini Mulyadi dan Gunawan Widjaja. 2007. Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan Hak-Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta : Kencana.

Laurensius Arliman S. 2015. Penegakan Hukum dan Kesadaran Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Levina Azaria Winantyo. 2018. “Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah dengan Hak Pengelolaan yang dikuasai oleh PT Pertamina (Studi Kasus: Sengketa Komplek Militer antara TNI dengan PT Pertamina di Kebon Jeruk). Jurnal Jurist-Diction Volume 1 Nomor 2 November 2018. Surabaya: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.

M. Syamsudin. 2008. “Beban Masyarakat Adat Menghadapi Hukum Negara”. Jurnal Hukum Nomor 3 Volume 15 Julo 2008. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Mira Novana Ardani. 2017. “Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Bagi Orang Asing di Indonesia”. Jurnal Law Reform Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017: Semarang: Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Supriyadi. 2010. Aspek Hukum Tanah Aset Daerah Menemukan keadilan, Kemanfaatan, dan Kepastian atas Eksistensi Tanah Aset Daerah. Jakarta : PT Prestasi Pustakaraya, hlm. 1

Nuruz Zaman. 2016. Politik Hukum Pengadaan Tanah. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. 2016. “Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional”. E-Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 45 Nomor 2 April 2016. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

O. Yudhi Setiawan, 2009, Instrumen Hukum Campuran Dalam Konsolidasi Tanah, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

PT Freeport Indonesia. 2020. “Peningkatan Kapasitas Masyarakat, Memberdayakan Masyarakat, Menjaga Kebersamaan”. https://ptfi.co.id/id/community-capacity-building

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2014. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.

Suharyo. 2019. “Perlindungan Hukum Pertanahan Adat di Papua dalam Negara Kesejahteraan”.

A.Z. Nasution, 1995, Konsumen dan Hukum, Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.

Diamond, Larry dan Leonardo Molino. 2005. “Asseesing The Qualitt of Democarcy”. The John Hopkins University Press, Biltomore.

Habernas, Jurgen. 1996. “Between Factsand Norm”. Polity Press, Cambride.

Revitch, Diare dan Abiggil Therstrom (ed). 2005. Demokrasi Klasik dan Modern ditejemahkan oleh Hermoyo. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Robert, Andrew. 2010. “The Quallity of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Publik Prefernces and Policy Reform. “ University Press, Cambride.

Santoyo Purwo, 2014 “Merancang Arah Baru Demokrasi Indonesia Pasca Reformasi”, KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia), Jakarta.

Sugiono, 2012. MEetode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta, Bandung

Shumpeter Joseph. 1950. Capitalism, Sosialism, and Democracy. Happer, Network.

Pito Andrianus Toni et all. 2006. Mengenal Teori-Teori Politik Dari Sistem Politik Samoai Korupsi. Nuansa, Bandung.

Yin, RK 2011. Qualititative Research: Form Star to Finish, N.Y: The Guiford Press, NY.

Ayu Pertiwi Diah, Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Daftar Di Indonesia: Melahirkan Korupsi Politik? Jurnal Trias Politica, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Vol.2, No.1, PP.1-14.2018.

Doni Ramdani Muhammad dan Fahmi Arisandi. Pengaruh Penggunaan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Proporsional Daftar Terbuka. Jurnal Reehtsvinding. Univeristas 17 Agustus 1945. Vol,3.PP.1-11, 2014.

Silalahi Agus, “Korelasi Pengaturan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Barbasis Suara Terbanyak Dengan Korupsi Politik di Indonesia”. Jurnal Yustisia, Univeristas 11 Maret. Vol 4.No.1.PP.1-14, 2015.

https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/14/03/19/n2o11c-hasil-riset-ini- jumlah-

Arba, (2015). Indonesian Agrarian Law, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Chomzah, Ali A., (2002). Land Law, Land Law Series I Awarding State Land Rights, Land Law II Certificate Series and Its Problems, Literature Achievement Publisher, Jakarta.

Gautama, S., (1990). Interpretation of the Basic Agrarian Law, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Hatta, M. (1977). Elaboration of Article 33 in the Constitution of 1945, Mutiara, Jakarta.

Harsono, B., (2000),. Indonesian Agrarian Law, Djambat, Jakarta.

Indonesia, Constitution of 1945.

Indonesia, Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles.

Indonesia, Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining.

Indonesia, Government Regulation 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.

Indonesia, Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.

Indonesia, Constitutional Court Decision No. 001-021-022 / PUU-I / 2003 concerning Judicial Review Number 20 of 2002 on Electricity.

Manan, B., (1995). Growth and Development of the Constitution of a Country, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Muljadi, K. and Widjaja, G., (2008), Rights to Land i n the Series of Assets, Kencana, Jakarta.

Santoso, U., (2010), Registration and Transfers of Land, Kencana, Jakarta.

Santoso, U., (2015), Land Acquisition of Land, Kencana, Jakarta.

Sitorus, O. and Dyawati, N., (1994), Land Rights and Condos A Legal Review, Dasamedia Utama, Jakarta.

Zarqoni, Muhammad M., (2015), Land Rights, Acquisitions, Origins and Derivatives, and Their Relationship with Legal Guarantees and Property Rights Protection, Achievement of Publisher Library, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-25