Presentase Dan Jaringan Korupsi Angelina Sondakh Pada Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Agung No 1616kPis.Sus2013

  • Anang Setiawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Achmad Nurmandi Universitas Muhammadiayah Yogyakarta
Keywords: Corruption, Bribery, Network

Abstract

The rise of corruption cases that occur in Indonesia today, if we see corruption cases in Indonesia every year is always increasing, not decreasing, this causes people to feel angry with corruptors. The percentage and network of corruption Angelina Sondakh of the Supreme Court Judge's Decision No. 1616k / Pis.Sus / 2013 is quite interesting to examine especially if we can see who the dominant actors are in this case, both from the planning process, the bidding process, the bid evaluation process, and implementation and evaluation. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach which illustrates the phenomenon of Angelina sondakh corruption case in the Supreme Court's Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013. Descriptive analysis in this study uses the Nvivo 12 Plus software. Data from this study were sourced from the Supreme Court Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 and previous research relating to the Corruption of Angelina Sondakh. The results of this discussion The conclusions that the author can take from the presentation of the analysis above are based on the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 analyzed with Nvivo 12 Plus in general from the four processes above can be seen Corporate 9.05%, Government 7.62%, Political Parties 0.32% and Political Consultants 0%.

Keyword: Corruption; Bribery; Network

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. K. (2016). Gratifikasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Di Indonesia Dan Solusinya Menurut Islam. Jurnal Syariah, 24(2), 179–206.
ARIYATAMA PUTRA WIRANATA. (2015). Terobosan Hukum (Rule Breaking) dalam Menciptakan Putusan yang Berkeadilan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1616 K/Pid.Sus/2013), 1(30), 77–87.
Ashyrov, G. (2019). Role of managerial traits in firm-level corruption: evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0019
Azim, M. I., Sheng, K., & Barut, M. (2017). Combating corruption in a microfinance institution. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4–5), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2016-1342
Bruno, L. (2019). A PERCEPÇÃO DOS ENFERMEIROS SOBRE EDUCAÇÃO PERMANENTE EM SAÚDE NO CONTEXTO DA ESTRATÉGIA SAÚDE DA FAMÍLIA DE SOBRAL (CE). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Büchner, S., Freytag, A., González, L. G., & Güth, W. (2008). Bribery and public procurement: An experimental study. Public Choice, 137(1–2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9315-9
Clark, R., Coviello, D., Gauthier, J. F., & Shneyerovy, A. (2018). Bid rig ging and entry deterrence in public procurement: Evidence from an investigation into collusion and corruption in Quebec. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 34(3), 301–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewy011
Dion, M. (2017). Philosophical connections between the classical and the modern notion of corruption from the Enlightenment to post-modernity. Journal of Financial Crime, 24(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2016-0009
Forson, J. A. (2016). A “recursive framework” of corruption and development. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-05-2016-0027
Hauser, C. (2019). Reflecting on the role of universities in the fight against corruption. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-09-2018-0080
hermanto, hermanto. (2001). Korupsi Dan Pembangunan. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan., 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.2.1.1458
Huda, G. N. (2012). Konstruksi realitas penahanan angelina sondakh sebagai tersangka kasus dugaan suap pembahasan anggaran, 299–319.
Ikoh, M. U. (2018). Nigerian corruption complex: rethinking complementarities to curative measures. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2016-0082
Jiménez, A., & Alon, I. (2018). Corruption, political discretion and entrepreneurship. Multinational Business Review, 26(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-01-2018-0009
Jonck, P., & Swanepoel, E. (2016). The influence of corruption: a South African case. Policing, 39(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2015-0076
Kim, Y. J., & Kim, E. S. (2016). Exploring the interrelationship between public service motivation and corruption theories. Evidence-Based HRM, 4(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-12-2015-0047
Kohalmi, L. (2013). The never-ending fight: Economic and political corruption in Hungary. Danube, 2013(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2013-0003
Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2019). Disentangling anti-corruption agencies and accounting for their ineffectiveness. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0016
Lourenço, I. C., Rathke, A., Santana, V., & Branco, M. C. (2018). Corruption and earnings management in developed and emerging countries. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2016-0226
Madah Marzuki, M., & Abdul Wahab, E. A. (2018). International financial reporting standards and conservatism in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries: Evidence from Jurisdiction Corruption Index. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2017-0098
Maguchu, P. S. (2018). The law is just the law: analysing the definition of corruption in Zimbabwe. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2017-0055
Mukherjee, R., & Gokcekus, O. (2004). Gender and Corruption in the Public Sector. Global Corruption Report 2004, 337–339. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=omer_gokcekus
Nurlita, Y., & Tanujaya, E. (2019). Asia Pacific Fraud Journal. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.19.04.01.01
Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., & Hasse, J. (2019). Polarisasi Politik Islam di Twitter dan Media Online dalam Kontestasi Pilpres 2019, 2019.
Ogbu, C. P., & Asuquo, C. F. (2018). Ethical and cost performances of projects: a canonical correlation. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(3), 352–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-01-2018-0015
Prabowo, H. Y. (2015). Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses Hendi. Facilities, 35(6), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2014-0022
Prabowo, H. Y., Omar, N., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2013). Curing corruption in indonesia: a behavioral perspective. The 5th International Conference on Financial Criminology (ICFC) 2013, 363–381.
Sadigov, T. (2018). Psychological dimension of corruption: How are citizens likely to support anti-corruption policies in Azerbaijan? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(5–6), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-10-2017-0133
Siahaan, C. (2017). Commodification of on Hambalang Corruption Case in Indonesian Lawyer Club (ILC) Talkshow in TVOne, (Ilc), 337–354.
Sinuraya, C. G., & Rachmawati, T. (2017). Does Icts Matters for Corruption? Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 1(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.16.01.01.04
Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1
Vaswani, M. (1997). MAPPING CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT. Journal of Financial Crime Iss, 5(1), 39–44. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025814%5Cnhttp://
Wahyuni, E. N. (2011). Perempuan dan korupsi. Jawa Post, (November), 23. Retrieved from http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/388/1/Perempuan dan korupsi 2011.pdf
Williams-Elegbe, S. (2018). Systemic corruption and public procurement in developing countries: are there any solutions? Journal of Public Procurement, 18(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2018-009
Wright, F. B. (2006). Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill in summary. Occupational Health Review, (123).
Xu, M., & Li, D. Z. (2019). Equilibrium competition, social welfare and corruption in procurement auctions. Social Choice and Welfare, 53(3), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01192-8
Yani, A. (2019). PEMISKINAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI SALAH SATU KORUPSI, 2(1), 36–42.
Zaki, F. arindra. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana badan usaha Milik negara (buMn) sebagai Pelaku tindak Pidana Pencucian uang Yang berasal dari koruPsi Fakhri, 1(2), 517–536.
Published
2020-03-06
Abstract viewed = 35 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 22 times