EFEKTIVITAS YURISDIKSI MAHKAMAH PIDANA INTRNASIONAL (INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT) DALAM MENCEGAH IMPUNITAS

Muhammad Rusli Arafat

doi:10.25299/uirlrev.2024.vol8(1).15759

Authors

Muhammad Rusli Arafat Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2024.vol8(1).15759

Keywords:

International Criminal Court, Jurisdiction, Impunity.

Abstract

The long history of international criminal law enforcement above is one form of the international community's concern for victims of international crimes, because in practice, it is sometimes not easy to rely on national legal mechanisms and institutions to deal with international crime situations, because international crimes can be committed by individuals who politically have power in a country, so that national courts are expected Prosecuting and dealing with international crimes committed may be in a situation of not being able to perform the expected role. By Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998, International Criminal Court It has four types of jurisdictions, namely:1) Personal Jurisdiction (ratione personae); 2) criminal/material jurisdiction (ratione materiae); 3) Territorial Jurisdiction (ratione loci); dan 4) Temporal jurisdiction (ratione temporis). The jurisdiction that the ICC has in prosecuting, prosecuting and prosecuting perpetrators of crimes in preventing impunity is still ineffective because it still has factors or reasons that make perpetrators of crimes can enjoy impunity or be free from prosecution and legal responsibility for their actions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antonio Cassese. 2003. International Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Arie Siswanto. 2016. “Pengadilan Hibrida (Hybrid Court) Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Kejahatan Internasional.” Jurnal Refleksi Hukum 10(1).

Eddy Djunaedi Karnasudirdja. 2003. Dari Pengadilan Militer Internasional Nuremberg Ke Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia, Sejarah Pengadilan Pidana Internasional Sejak Perang Dunie Ke II Hingaa Sekarang. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.

Georg Schwa rzenberger. 1968. “International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals: The Law of Armed Conflict.” Netherlands International Law Review 2.

Henry Campbell. 1991. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, Centennial Edition.

International Criminal Court. 2014. “Declaration Accepting the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.”

International Criminal Court. 2015. “ICC Welcomes Palestine as a New State Party.”

International Criminal Court. n.d. “Situations and Cases, Situations under Investigation.” Retrieved (https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/situations.aspx).

International, Other. 1949. “International Military Tribunal for the Far East.” International Organization 3(1):184–86. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300014399.

J. Llewellyn. 2001. “A Comment on the Complementary Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: Adding Insult to Injury in Transnat Ional Contexts?” Dallhousie Law Journal 24.

Manhoush H. Arsanjani. 1999. “The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” 93 American Journal of International Law 22.

Parthiana, I. Wayan. 2006. Hukum Pidana Internasional. Bandung: CV Yrama Widya.

Peter Ma lanczuk, Akehurst’s. 2002. “Modern Introudction to International Law, London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.”

Rmann, Andreas Zimme. 2008. Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Applicable Law: Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court. Portland: Hart and Publishing.

Roy S. Lee Ed. 1999. The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results”. Kluwer Law International.

Schindler, Dietrich, and Jiri Toman. 2021. “Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis.” The Laws of Armed Conflicts 1253–61.

Tolib Effendi. 2014. Hukum Pidana Internasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

United Nations. 1998. The International Criminal Court (ICC).

United Nations. 2010. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

United Nations. 2017. “The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Retrieved (http://www.icty.org/en/about).

United Nations Security Council. 1993. Resolution On Establishing an International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia.

United Nations Security Council. 1994. Resolution on Establishment of an International Tribunal and Adoption of the Statute of the Tribunal.

Wathc, Human Rights. 2013. “Child Soldiers.” Retrieved (https://www.hrw.org/to%0Apic/childrens-rights/child-soldiers).

William A. Schabas. 2001. An Introduction to The International Criminal Court. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

William A. Schabas. 2010. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

William Thomas Worster. 2012. “The Exercise of Jurisdiction By The International Criminal Court Over Palestine.” American University International Law Review 26(5).