TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENGUJIAN FORMIL UNDANG-UNDANG DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2022.vol6(1).15560Abstract
One of the powers of the Constitutional Court is to carry out legal review of the 1945 Constitution. This review consists of formal review and material review. In implementing the authority for formal review, not a single request for formal review has been granted by the Constitutional Court. One of the problems, if viewed from a normative perspective, is that the touchstone for the implementation of judicial review is the law, not the 1945 Constitution as intended in the provisions of Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution.
Downloads
References
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006).
Zainal Arifin Hoesein. 2009. Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung RI Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, hlm. 75.
Jed Rubenfeld, Freedom and Time: Theory of Constitutional Self Government, London, Yale University Press, 2001, h.178. Lihat juga Saldi Isra, “Melepas Hakim Palguna”, Opini Harian Media Indonesia, 7 Januari 2020, h. 6.
Rishan, Idul, “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang- Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2021) 18 Jurnal Konstitusi.
Sulistiyowati Irianto, “Pendidikan Hukum Untuk Masa Depan Indonesia: Sebuah Catatan Kritis”, Makalah Pada Orasi Ilmiah Sulistyowati Irianto Dies Natalis FH UGM ke-74, Yogyakarta, Februari 2020, h. 11.
Luc J. Wintgens, Legisprudence Practical Reason In Legislation, Union Road England, Ashgate publishing Limited, 2012, h. 206.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
