Interpersonal Communication in Professional and Social Meetings: Exploring Best Practices for Meaningful Human Encounters
PDF

Keywords

Interpersonal Communication
Meetings
Human Encounters
Active Listening
Empathy
Communication Ethics

How to Cite

Chowdhary, R. S., & Arun Kumar Sinha. (2026). Interpersonal Communication in Professional and Social Meetings: Exploring Best Practices for Meaningful Human Encounters. International Journal of Media and Communication Research, 7(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.25299/ijmcr.v7i1.26997

Abstract

Interpersonal communication plays a vital role in determining the effectiveness and outcomes of professional and social meetings. Although meetings are a routine part of academic, organizational, and community life, many fail to produce meaningful interaction or productive dialogue. These shortcomings often stem from poor communication practices, rigid hierarchies, unequal participation, and limited empathetic engagement. In the contemporary era of digital distractions and time constraints, the human dimension of meetings is frequently overlooked, negatively affecting collaboration and decision-making. This study examines best practices of interpersonal communication that promote meaningful human encounters in meeting contexts. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and systematic observations across various professional and social settings. The analysis focuses on verbal exchanges, listening behaviors, non-verbal communication, emotional intelligence, and relational dynamics among participants. Special attention is given to the influence of power relations and communication styles on participation and mutual understanding. The findings indicate that active listening, empathetic responsiveness, respectful communication, and inclusive participation significantly improve trust, cooperation, and collective problem-solving. In contrast, barriers such as dominance by authority figures, inattentiveness, digital multitasking, and dismissive behaviors hinder effective interpersonal engagement. The study highlights the importance of human-centered communication ethics, reflective interaction practices, and emotional awareness in creating more productive meeting cultures. By providing practical recommendations, this research contributes to the understanding of interpersonal communication in organizational and social environments. It offers actionable insights for educators, administrators, professionals, and community leaders seeking to enhance the quality of interaction and relational outcomes in meetings. Strengthening interpersonal communication practices is essential for fostering collaboration, mutual respect, and more meaningful human encounters in both formal and informal meeting contexts.

https://doi.org/10.25299/ijmcr.v7i1.26997
PDF

References

Allen, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Shanock, L. R., Scott, C. W., & Shuffler, M. (2022). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary review. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100857.

Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1).

Barge, J. K., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2021). Meeting effectiveness and leadership communication. Leadership, 17(1), 3–26.

Beyea, D., Rauvola, R. S., & McIntyre, K. P. (2024). Zoom fatigue: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100204.

Charoenporn, V., Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., & Nochaiwong, S. (2024). Zoom fatigue and its relationship with online learning engagement among medical students. BMC Medical Education, 24, 845.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (2020). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 66(8), 3291–3307.

Fauville, G., Luo, M., Müller Queiroz, A. C., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2023). Nonverbal mechanisms predict Zoom fatigue and explain gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107264.

Goleman, D. (2021). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 99(2), 82–91.

Kobayashi, M., Yamamoto, T., & Sato, K. (2025). Enhancing psychological safety through group-based communication interventions. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1302.

Ma, G., Zhang, Y., & Ding, X. (2024). Empathetic leadership and employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1348921.

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2025). Digital distraction in synchronous online environments: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1055–1078.

Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2020). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 271–296.

Muss, C., & Winter, C. (2025). Empathy in leadership: A systematic literature review. Journal of Leadership Studies, 18(1), 23–41.

Newton, A., & Dawson, P. (2024). Active listening as a pedagogical tool for student engagement. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 26, 1–15.

Pirsoul, T., et al. (2023). Emotional intelligence and career-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 139, 103777.

Rogelberg, S. G. (2023). Glad we met: The art and science of 1:1 meetings. Oxford University Press.

Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2021). Humble leadership: The power of relationships, openness, and trust. Berrett-Koehler.

StatPearls Publishing. (2023). Active listening. In StatPearls. National Library of Medicine.

Tannen, D. (2021). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation (Updated ed.). HarperCollins.

Wen, T., Zhao, Y., & Li, S. (2025). Communication network structures and participation inequality in organizational meetings. Information & Management, 62(2), 103912.

Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2022). Emotional intelligence and leader–member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 33(4), 101581.

Zhang, X., Cao, Q., & Tjosvold, D. (2022). Linking respectful communication to team cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(6), 945–960.

Zhao, X., & McClure, J. (2023). Authority dominance and voice suppression in workplace meetings. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(3), 425–451.

Zhu, Y., & Chen, H. (2024). Emotional intelligence, listening behavior, and interpersonal trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1123456.

Schein, E. H. (2013). Humble inquiry: The gentle art of asking instead of telling. Berrett-Koehler.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ruchita Sujai Chowdhary, Arun Kumar Sinha

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.