Abstract
The screening of the documentary film Pesta Babi: Kolonialisme di Zaman Kita (Pig Feast: Colonialism in Our Time) on YouTube in May 2026 triggered thousands of comments from viewers across Indonesia. This study analyzes how conversation patterns formed in the comment section, and specifically whether they constituted a balanced discussion space or instead became fragmented into groups that did not engage in dialogue with one another. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA) through YouTube Data Tools (YTDT) and Gephi, data from 28,328 comments and 5,525 user interactions were mapped into a visual network. The results reveal a very sparse network (density 0.01), divided into 41 disconnected components, with 50 discourse clusters and a modularity score of 0.472. All five of the largest clusters exclusively represented pro-film and pro-Papua discourse, and not a single cluster was found that consistently supported government policy. Even an account that self-identified as a member of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) confirmed the film's truthfulness. Although discourse fragmentation in digital public spheres has been widely studied, no prior research has applied SNA to YouTube comments of indigenous rights documentary films in Indonesia. These findings are interpreted through Habermas's public sphere theory. Rather than serving as an arena for rational and balanced discussion, the YouTube comment section of the Pesta Babi film instead reveals discourse fragmentation that is ideologically consolidated, a condition the researchers characterize as a deliberative illusion.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016). Community detection in networks: A user guide. Physics Reports, 659, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002
franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
González-Bailón, S., & Wang, N. (2016). Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks, 44, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.003
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221083213
Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Espina, C. (2017). Classifying Twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545
Laksono, D. D., & Dale, C. J. P. (2026). Pesta babi: Kolonialisme di zaman kita [Film dokumenter].Redaksi JubiTV. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpdrWgDRVf8
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
Nurnafia, R. A., Nugraha, A. R., & Komariah, K. (2025). Social-mediated communication and network dynamics in online gambling discourse: A social network analysis of YouTube comments on “Indonesia Darurat Judi Online”. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1584444.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1584444
Oz, M., Zheng, P., & Chen, G. M. (2018). Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impersonality, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3400–3419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733416
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Rieder, B. (2015). YouTube Data Tools (Version 1.30) [Perangkat lunak]. Digital Methods Initiative. https://ytdt.digitalmethod.net
Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to “ranking cultures”: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50–68.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982
Shevtsov, A., Oikonomidou, M., Antonakaki, D., Pratikakis, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2023). What tweets and YouTube comments have in common? Sentiment and graph analysis on data related to US elections 2020. PLoS ONE, 18(1), e0270542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270542
Tapsell, R. (2017). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Tempo.co. (2024, 16 Oktober). Masyarakat adat Merauke tolak PSN food estate: Proyek berlangsung brutal. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/lingkungan/masyarakat-adat-merauke-tolak-psn-food-estate-proyek-berlangsung-brutal-405399
Trend Asia. (2025, 8 Oktober). Proyek food & energy estate Prabowo terabas hutan lindung, ancam hutan dan masyarakat adat Papua Selatan. Trend Asia. https://trendasia.org/proyek-food-energy-estate-prabowo-terabas-hutan-lindung-ancam-hutan-dan-masyarakat-adat-papua-selatan/
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wijaya, R. (2026, 22 Mei). Film Pesta Babi kini tayang di YouTube, ini link menontonnya. Kompas.com.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ady Adnan Syah, Freddy Yusanto, Catur Nugroho