Efektivitas AI-Storylit dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Visual dan Computational Thinking Siswa Sekolah Dasar
Keywords:
Alih Kode, Campur Kode, Gaya Wacana, Kearifan Lokal, StilistikaAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh AI-StoryLIT, Interactive Digital Storybook berbasis kecerdasan buatan dengan fitur text-to-speech, image generation, dan adaptive feedback, terhadap literasi visual dan kemampuan computational thinking siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain kuasi-eksperimen pretest-posttest control group diterapkan pada 30 siswa SDN 1 Wonocoyo yang terbagi dalam kelompok eksperimen (n=15) dan kelompok kontrol (n=15). Instrumen tes telah divalidasi ahli (87,2%), dengan analisis menggunakan uji-t independen, N-Gain, dan effect size Cohen's d. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada kelompok eksperimen. Literasi visual mencapai rerata posttest 84,38 (N-Gain 0,55; sedang) dibanding kontrol 72,12 (N-Gain 0,21; rendah), dengan effect size 1,21 (besar). Computational thinking mencapai rerata 82,75 (N-Gain 0,54; sedang) dibanding kontrol 70,18 (N-Gain 0,19; rendah), dengan effect size 1,34 (besar). Peningkatan tertinggi terjadi pada indikator interpretasi dan pengenalan pola. AI-StoryLIT terbukti menjadi alternatif strategis dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21 yang integratif dan adaptif di sekolah dasar.
Downloads
References
Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 1-19.
Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2020). Visual literacy theory: Moving forward. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3-4), 145-162.
Bali, C., Tasdelen, B., Bandi, S., & Zsidó, A. (2026). Understanding the cognitive cost of multimedia learning: effects of visual load and language proficiency. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 11(1), 2.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2022). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Falloon, G. (2022). Developing computational thinking in early years students: Evidence from a structured curriculum. Computers & Education, 178, 104401.
Falloon, G. W. (2024). Advancing young students' computational thinking: An investigation of structured curriculum in early years primary schooling. Computers & Education, 216, 105045.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Guinibert, M., Theunissen, P., & Cochrane, T. (2018). The more you know, the more you see: M-learning of visual literacy skills. Auckland University of Technology.
Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2020). Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: A mediation analysis among primary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106230.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Wang, Q., Niu, P., & Zhang, X. (2026). Adaptive vs. planned metacognitive scaffolding for computational thinking: Evidence from generative AI-supported programming in elementary education. Computers & Education, 241, 105473.
Maula, N. M., & Antara, I. G. W. S. (2024). Pengembangan media buku interaktif digital untuk meningkatkan literasi baca tulis siswa kelas I sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 123-135.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
McLeod, G. R. (2022). Photomedia literacy in ruins? In Teaching Visually: A Guidebook to Visually Immersed Higher Education. Brill/Sense.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Nanditasari, D., & Wibawa, S. (2024). Pengembangan buku cerita bergambar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca siswa kelas II sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 9(1), 89-102.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (2020). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Papert, S. (2020). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
Roberts, D. (2021). I see, therefore I learn: pedagogic innovation in the cognitive-visual era. Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 2(5), 16-26.
Sekartanjung, B. A., dkk. (2024). Pengembangan media flipbook cerita rakyat untuk meningkatkan minat baca siswa kelas III SDN Rejosari 01 Semarang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 134-148.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian & pengembangan: Research and development. Alfabeta.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Troseth, G. L., & Strouse, G. A. (2023). In modeling digital learning, remember pictorial competence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(4), 491-496.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2022). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (3rd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Wing, J. M. (2024). Computational thinking: Forty years later. Communications of the ACM, 67(1), 32-35.
Xavier, T. (2026). More Than Coding: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of the Multidimensional Landscape of Programming and AI in Primary Education. Mendeley Data.
Zhao, M., Li, X., & Zhou, X. (2024). An Empirical Study on Designing STEM+AI Teaching to Cultivate Primary School Students' Computational Thinking Perspective and Identity. In 2024 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) (pp. 93-98). IEEE.
