Pengaruh Blended Learning Model dan Sikap Berbahasa terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Bahasa Inggris Siswa Sekolah Menegah Atas Negeri di Kota Pekanbaru
Writing ability is one of the demands of learning English. However, writing is also the most difficult skill faced by high school students in the city of Pekanbaru. For this reason, the learning model should be appropriate in accordance with the age development and problems faced by students. Thus, the authors attempted to analyze; (1) the effect of blended learning on students’ writing ability; (2) the effectof language attitude on students’ writing ability; and (3) the effect of
blended learning model and language attitude on students’ writing ability. Referring to the problems and purposes of this study, the author used a quantitative approach namely the experimental method with factorial design. The research was conducted at SMAN 6 Pekanbaru by using a random sampling technique. To measure students' writing ability, the researchersemployed a writing test. Whereas to obtain information or collect data related to language attitude in this study, the researchers distributed questionnaires that have been tested for validity and reliability. After collecting data, researchers tested the data and hypotheses using SPSS 21. In this study, data was normally distributed and the population was homogeneous so that hypothesis testing could be continued. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, this study could be concluded that; (1) there was an effect of blended learning on students’ writing ability; (2) there was an effectof language attitude on students’ writing ability; and (3) there was no effect of blended learning model and language attitude on students’ writing ability.
Brown, H. Douglas. (1994). Principle of language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended Learning Design : Five Key Ingredients. Blended Learning Design: 5 Key Ingredients, (August), 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.198
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Deporter, B. (2000). Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. San Diego, CA:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussions: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Fasold, R. (1984). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fazio, H. ., & Olson, A. . (2003). Attitudes: Foundations, Functions, and Consequences. The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology.https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608221.n6.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Phsycology and Second Language Learning: the Role of Attitudes and Motivation. Social Phsycology and Second Language Learning. Retrieved from http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/SECONDLANGUAGE1985book.pdf
Harmer, J. (2004). How To Teach Writing. London: Longman.
Ho, B. (2006). Effectiveness of using the process approach to teach writing in six Hong Kong primary classrooms. New Horizons in Education, 17(1), 1–52. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cityu.edu.hk/en/research/spring2006ho.pdf
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Models of blended learning. Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools, 6–9. Retrieved from http://www.blendedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/1-Models-of-Blended-Learning.pdf
Husamah. (2014). Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning): Terampil Memadukan Keunggulan Pembelajaran Face-To-Face, E-Learning Offline-Online, dan Mobile Learning. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Köse, U. (2010). A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0 technologies. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 2794–2802).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.417
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time‐based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163913
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Wahyuni, S. (2017). Students’ Ability in Writing Hortatory Exposition of Eleventh Grade Students at SMAN 14 Pekanbaru. Journal of English for Academic, 4(2), 87–93. Retrieved from http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/jshmic/article/view/537
Wahyuni, S. (2018). Students’ Perspectives on Using Telegram Messenger as A Learning Media. ELT-Lectura Journal, 5(1), 31-37. Retrieved from https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/ELT-Lectura/article/view/1073
Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic Writing: From Paragraph to Essay. Macmillan Publishers.