Pengaruh Komunikasi Risiko dan Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Mitigasi Bencana Semburan Gas di Kota Pekanbaru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.v12i2.17531Keywords:
Komunikasi Resiko, Sikap Masyarakat, Bencana Semburan Gas AlamAbstract
Environmental and communication issues are interrelated and have a significant impact on each other. Communication plays an important role in how we understand, convey and respond to environmental issues. Remembering the risks that a disaster can cause not only in the form of property loss, but also environmental damage and loss of life. The main aim of risk communication is to increase individual or community understanding, awareness and preparation of existing risks. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of risk communication and community attitudes towards disaster mitigation in Pekanbaru City. This research is quantitative research involving 375 respondents. The results of this research show that the partial test results for the risk communication variable on disaster mitigation are sig. 0.011 < 0.05, where the risk communication variable influences disaster mitigation. In the partial test the community attitude variable does not influence disaster mitigation, this is because the partial test result on this variable is sig. 0.133 > sig.0.05. Based on the results of the simultaneous test or F test which was carried out, the influence between the independent variables simultaneously and the dependent variable was 3.292, where the value in the F test was greater than the t table test, namely 0.098.
Key Words: Risk Communication, Community Attitudes, Natural Gas Burst Disaster, Pekanbaru City.
Downloads
References
A, Morissan M. 2014. Metode Penelitian Survei. Cet-2. Jakarta: Kencana.
Bandana, Kar, and David Cochran. 2019. Risk Communication and Community Resilience. London and New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
Griffin. 2010. A First Look at Communication Theory. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.Bungin.
Hanafi, M. 2006. Manajemen Risiko. Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Y K PN.
Hawkins, D.I., dan Mothersbaugh, D. .. 2010. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Littlejohn, Stephen W. Littlejohn dan Karen A. Foss. 2009. Teori Komunikasi, Theories of Human Communication. 9th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Morissan. 2014. Teori Komunikasi Individu Hingga Massa. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Petty, R. E., Barden, J., & Wheeler, S. C. 2009. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion: Developing Health Promotions for Sustained Behavioral Change. Dalam R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. Kegler, Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Pract. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rahmayanti, H., & Dkk. 2020. Mitigasi Bencana: Inovasi Model DIFMOL dalam Pendidikan Lingkungan. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.
Rasyid, Anuar. 2019. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Pekanbaru: UR Press.
Rinaldi A. 2016. Hubungan Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Personal Hygiene dengan Terjadinya Diare pada Anak di Puskesmas Krueng Barona Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Fakultas Kedokteran Syiah Kuala. H: 40-9.
Rudianto. 2015. “Komunikasi Dalam Penanggulangan Bencana.” Simbolika 1(1).
Sabir, A., & Phil, M.. 2016. Gambaran Umum persepsi masyarakat terhadap bencana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Sosial, 2016; 5(3), 304–326.
Samin, 2022. Energi dan Produksi Bahan bakar Gas. Pekalongan: Penerbit NEM.
Shinta Simehate, Wheny Utariningsih, Mardiati Mardiati, Sarah Rahmayani Siregar, Ridhalul Ikhsan. 2023. “Gambaran Tingkat Pengetahuan Masyarakat Terhadap Mitigasi Bencana Tanah Longsor Di Desa Burni Pase Kabupaten Bener Meriah.” GALINICAL: Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan Mahasiswa Malikussaleh Vol 2, No. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/jkkmm.v2i1.8190
Silviani, I. 2020. Komunikasi Organisasi. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D”. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Tamitiadini, Dian, dkk. 2019. Komunikasi Bencana: Teori dan Pendekatan Praktis Studi Kebencanaan di Indonesia. Malang: UB Press.
Timothy L. Sellnow dan Robert R. Ulmer. 2009. Effective Risk Communication : A Massage-Centered Approach. New York: Springer Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79727-4
UNISDR. 2009. Unisdr Terminology On Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations.
Van den Honert, R. C. 2016. Improving decision making about natural disaster mitigation funding in Australia—A framework. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5030028
Wekke, Ismail Suardi. 2021. Mitigasi Bencana. Jawa Barat: Penerbit Adab.
West, Richard &. Lynn H. Turner. 2010. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Yulaikha Istiqomah, Eska Dwi Prajayanti. 2023. “Gambaran Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Masyarakat Tentang Mitigasi Dan Kesiapsiagaan Bencana Banjir.” Nursing News: Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Vol 7, No. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33366/nn.v7i1.2525
Zahari RK, Ariffin RNR. 2013. Risk communications: flood-prone communities of Kuala Lumpur. Procedia Environmental Sciences; 880-888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.106
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Medium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
