Disfemisme dalam Akun Facebook Kementerian Kesehatan RI Tentang Virus Corona
Keywords:
dysphemism, facebook, coronaAbstract
This study aims to describe the forms and functions of dysphemism used by netizens in comments on the Indonesian Ministry of Health's Facebook account about the corona virus. This study uses a qualitative research approach with descriptive methods obtained through observation of existing data. The results of the study show that many netizen comments use dysphemism with the most frequently used forms of language being word, phrase, and expression dysphemism. There are 35 linguistic forms of dysphemism found in this study. The function of dysphemism consists of five functions, namely as a sign of anger, a means of criticizing, a means of satirizing, a means of insulting, and a means of declaring taboo or obscene things. This research was conducted in May, June, July and August 2021 using the research object of netizen comments. As a qualitative researcher, the researcher becomes a key instrument and must have extensive theoretical knowledge and insight to obtain accurate research results.
Downloads
References
Almuqontirin, R. 2013. “Pemakaian Disfemisme dalam Berita Utama Surat Kabar Solo Pos”. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Allan, Keith and Kate Burridge. 2001. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Chaer, A. 2003. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A. 2007. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A. 2010. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Chaer, A. 2013. Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A. 2012. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1999. Semantik 2: Pemahaman Ilmu Makna. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama
Endang S. T. 2013. Penggunaan Disfemisme dalam Tajuk Rencana Surat Kabar Riau Pos. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau.
Ezeife, A.C. 2016. Metaphoric logic in the construction of patriarchal ideology: Euphemisms and dysphemisms in selected nigerian novels. Journal of Linguistics and Language in Education, Vol. 10, Number 1.56-73.
Fitriyana. 2019.” Disfemisme Warganet Dalam Komentar Di Instagram Pada Unggahan Pilpres 2019”. Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa : Volume 7 Edisi 1 Januari- Juni 2020. Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau.
Hamidy, U.U. 2003. Pembahasan Karya Fiksi dan Puisi. Pekanbaru: Bumi Aksara
Keraf, G. 2010. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kridalaksana, H. 2008. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Laili, Elisa Nurul. 2012. Eufemisme dan Disfemisme pada Wacana Lingkungan dalam Media Massa di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Tesis. Tidak Diterbitkan.
Leech, G. 1981. Semantics. Great Britain: Pinguin Books
Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Pateda, M. 2010. Semantik Leksikal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Parera, J.D. 2009. Dasar-dasar Analisis Sintaksis. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Ramlan, M. 1996. Sintaksis. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.
Sudaryat, Yayat. 2009. Makna dalam Wacana (Prinsip-prinsip Semantik dan. Pragmatik). Bandung: Yrama Widya
Soemarsono. 2007. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press Tarigan,
Henry Guntur. 1985. Pengajaran Semantik. Bandung: Angkasa
Wijana, I Dewa Putu dan Muhammad Rohmadi. 2011. Analisis Wacana. Pragmatik, Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka