Using IEPC Strategy to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension at Grade VIII.4 of SMP Negeri 3 Pekanbaru

https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2016.vol3(2).524

Authors

Keywords:

reading comprehension, IEPC strategy, factors

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to describe and explain to what extent IEPC strategy could improve students’ reading comprehension at grade VIII.4 of SMP Negeri 3 Pekanbaru and the factors that influenced the change of their reading comprehension by using IEPC strategy at grade VIII.4 of SMP Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. This research is classroom action research, every cycle consisted of four fundamental aspects namely, planning, action, observation, and reflection. This research consisted of three cycle, where in each cycle consisted of fourmeetings. The four meetings in one cycle involving three meetings for teaching reading by using IEPC strategy and one meeting for post-test at the end of every cycle.The participants of this research were the researcher, a collaborator and the students of grade VIII.4 of SMP Negeri 3 Pekanbaru totalling 40 students. The instruments of this research were reading comprehension test, an observation sheet, field note and interview.There were two findings of this research: (1) IEPC strategy could improve the students’ reading comprehension; (2) Teaching material and media, class activity, class management, and teacher’s approach were the factors that could influence the change of students’ reading comprehension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahuja, Pramila andAhuja, G.C. 2001. How to Increase Reading Speed, Procedures and Practices (4th Ed). New Delhi: Sterling Publisher Pvt.
Armbruster, B.B, Anderson, T.H, and Meyer, J.L.1990. The Framing Project: A Collaboration to Improve Content Area Reading Using Instructional Graphics (Tech.Rep). Urbana IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Block.C.C and Pressley. M. 2001. Comprehension Instruction: Research-based Best Practices. London: Guilford.
Burnes, D and Page, G. 1991. Insight and Strategies for Teaching Reading. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich Group. Pty Limited
Crawley, S.J and Merritt, K. 2009. Remediating Reading Difficulties. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Devine, T.G. 1987. Teaching Reading Comprehension from Teaching to Practice. Boston: Merril Publishing
Diptodadi, L. Veronica. 1992. Reading Strategies to improve comprehension in EFL. Jakarta: Teflin Journal.
Duke, N.K and Pearson, P.P. 2002. Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. London: International Reading Asscociation Inc.
Gambrell, L.B and Bales, R.J.1986. Mental Imagery and the Comprehension-Monitoring Performance of Fourth and Fifth Grade Poor Readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21.454-464.
Gay, L. R. 2000. Educational Research for Analysis and Application (9th Ed). New Jersey: Pearson.
Grabe, S & Sttaler F.L. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Longman.
Harmer. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching (2nd ed). Completely Revised and Update. London: Longman
Kemmis, Stephen. 1998. The Action Research Planner (3rd ed). Victoria: Deakin University Press
Kendeou and Broek, V.D. 2007. The Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Structure on Comprehension Processes during Reading of Scientific Texts. Jurnal Memory and Cognition, 1567-1577. Springer-Verlag.
Moyer, Tara. 2007. What Activities can be implemented in the Classroom to increase Students’ Motivation to Read.A journal. http://beryl.educ.psu.edu/pds_download/2007InquiryProjects/MoyerTInquiry0607.pdf
Oczkus, D.L. 2003. Reciprocal Teaching at Work: Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension. Newark, De: International Reading Association Inc.
Richard, Jack C. 2002. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stringer, Ernie. 2008. Action Research in Education (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Pearson.

Wastuti, Sri. 2005. The Effect of Collaboratiove Strategy Reading Toward the Second Year Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement at SLTP N 20 Pekanbaru. A Thesis. (Unpublished).

Wood, Karen. D. January 2002 • Volume 33 • Number 3 • Pages 47-54. Middle School Journal, Research into Practice. Aiding Comprehension with the Imagine, Elaborate, Predict, and Confirm (IEPC)Strategy.(www.nmsa.org/Publications/MiddleSchoolJournal/Articles/January2002/Article9/tabid/422/Default.aspx.)

Wood, K.D and Endres .C. December 1, 2004. Motivating Student interest with the Imagine, Elaborate and Confirm (IEPC) Strategy. The Teaching Reading Article. New York: Longman.

Published

2017-08-02

How to Cite

Warman, L. A. D. (2017). Using IEPC Strategy to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension at Grade VIII.4 of SMP Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 3(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2016.vol3(2).524