Negotiating Power and Communication in Contemporary Family and Marriage Systems: A Conceptual Review
Keywords:
Family Communication, Marriage, Power Negotiation, Emotional Labor, Intergenerational Relationships, Work–Family ConflictAbstract
Marriage and family institutions are undergoing profound transformation under the pressures of sociocultural change, gender reconfiguration, legal intervention, and intensifying communicative demands. These shifts have amplified tensions surrounding authority, autonomy, emotional responsibility, and intergenerational obligation. This integrative conceptual review synthesizes findings from five recent empirical studies conducted across diverse sociocultural contexts; Australia, Africa, Indonesia, the United States, and Korea to examine how communication operates simultaneously as a site of power negotiation, relational conflict, and adaptive resilience within contemporary families. Drawing on scholarship on forced marriage, cultural transformation, religious discourse, work–family conflict, and intergenerational relationships, the article identifies recurring communicative dynamics, including moral coercion, emotional labor, gendered expectations, and institutional strain. The analysis demonstrates that while contemporary marriage is increasingly characterized by instability and negotiation, family relationships often persist through adaptive communicative practices. The article advances a theoretically integrated framework that positions communication as the central infrastructure of contemporary marriage and family life, contributing to scholarship in family communication and relationship studies.
Downloads
References
Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2010). Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives. Sage.
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x (doi.org in Bing)
Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Multilingual Matters.
Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02529-000
Connell, R. W. (2005). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Polity Press.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hadiyansyah, D., Hunaida, W. L., & Anasy, Z. (2025). Vitalizing marital harmony: Rethinking the dominance of fiqh in cultivating sakinah relationships in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 8(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v8i2.12848 (doi.org in Bing)
Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Viking.
Lim-Soh, J., Kim, D., & Kim, K. (2025). Gendered patterns of intergenerational contact in Korea: Transitions from young-old to middle-old. Journal of Marriage and Family, 87(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13009
Madondo, E., Dhobha, H., & Mutema, P. (2025). Challenges and transformations of traditional African marriage in the modern era. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 14(4), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.3945 (doi.org in Bing)
Nelson, J., & Burn, J. (2025). Forced marriage and family relationships. Anti-Trafficking Review, 24, 141–164.
Schumm, W. R., Glen, B., Theodore, V. P., & Roy, R. N. (2025). Reliability and validation of U.S. army-oriented brief work-to-family and family-to-work conflict scales. Social Sciences, 14(10), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100599 (doi.org in Bing)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmahtunnisah Sailin, Jusang Bolong, Wan Anita Wan Abas, Mohd Sukki Othman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-02-08
Published 2025-12-31