URBAN STUDENTS SELF-EFFICACY PROFILE ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING: INSTRUMENT VALIDATION AND EVALUATION
Abstract
This research aims to determine students' self-efficacy regarding mathematics learning outcomes. The type of research used in this research is descriptive research. The population in this study were junior high school students in Pekanbaru City, with the sample consisting of 49 students from SMP Negeri 25 Pekanbaru and SMP Negeri 34 Pekanbaru consisting of 53 students. The sampling technique in this research was simple random sampling. The data collection technique in this research was carried out by survey using questionnaires and interviews. Data analysis in this study used descriptive statistics. The results obtained from the analysis of students' self-efficacy regarding mathematics learning outcomes are in the not good category with a percentage of 55%, and 45% are in the good category. The evaluation results show that the self-efficacy of students at SMP Negeri 25 Pekanbaru and SMP Negeri 34 Pekanbaru regarding mathematics learning outcomes is in the not-good category. Teachers should play a more active role as companions, mentors, directors, and motivators in mathematics learning. With this, students will feel confident in their ability to solve mathematical problems in learning materials that are considered difficult, which will further increase students' self-efficacy regarding mathematics learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
G. Joët, E. L. Usher, and P. Bressoux, “Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 649–663, 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0024048.
E. Yeşilyurt, A. H. Ulaş, and D. Akan, “Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 64, pp. 591–601, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038.
J. N. Igbo and J. C. Omeje, “Perceived efficacy of teacher-made instructional materials in promoting learning among Mathematics-Disabled children,” Sage Open, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2158244014538431.
W. Tuen Veronica Leung, T. Yee Tiffany Tam, W. C. Pan, C. Da Wu, S. C. Candice Lung, and J. D. Spengler, “How is environmental greenness related to students’ academic performance in English and Mathematics?,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.021.
C. Browning, A. J. Edson, P. M. Kimani, and F. Aslan-Tutak, “Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A focus on geometry and measurement,” Mathematics Enthusiast, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 333–383, 2014, doi: 10.54870/1551-3440.1306.
W. Kebede, “Investigating female learners’ attitude and challenges towards mathematics at the department of mathematics, Injibara college of teachers’ education, Injibara, Ethiopia,” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2256202.
N. Nofriyandi and D. Andrian, “Factors that Affect Students’ Mathematics Performance at Higher Education in Riau Province during The COVID-19 Pandemic,” Infinity Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 367, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p367-380.
D. Maclinton and D. Andrian, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Prisma Berbasis Macromedia Flash Dengan Desain Pembelajaran Assure,” Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 83–97, 2022, doi: 10.35438/inomatika.v4i1.323.
D. Andrian and A. Wahyuni, “Student Readiness Model Facing the Industrial Revolution 4.0,” in Second International Conference on Social, Economy, Education andHumanity(ICoSEEH 2019) - Sustainable Development in Developing Country forFacing Industria, SCITEPRESS, 2020, pp. 302–306. doi: 10.5220/0009128703020306.
E. Panadero, A. Jonsson, and J. Botella, “Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta- analyses Ernesto,” Educ Res Rev, vol. 22, pp. 74–94, 2017.
N. Saeid and T. Eslaminejad, “Relationship between Student’s Self-Directed-Learning Readiness and Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement Motivation in Students,” International Education Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 225, 2016, doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n1p225.
S. Maisaroh, N. Endahati, and D. Andrian, “Teachers’ Involvement Model in Managing Class at Primary Schools,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 745–758, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.29333/iji.2023.16340a.
Nofriyandi, Abdurrahman, and D. Andrian, “Digital Learning Media Integrated with Malay Culture to Improve Students’ Numeration Ability and Motivation,” Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 301–314, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
D. Andrian, A. Wahyuni, and S. Ramadhan, “Mathematics Teachers’ Performance in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0: A Structural Equation Model,” Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 554–563, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.236.
A. R. Baghestani, F. Ahmadi, A. Tanha, and M. Meshkat, “Bayesian Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio,” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 69–73, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07481756.2017.1308227.
V. K. Shrotryia and U. Dhanda, “Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244018821751.
R. W. Christensen and G. A. Knezek, “Construct Validity for the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Computers Questionnaire,” Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 143–155, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10402454.2009.10784623.
S. J. Newell, A. Chur-Hansen, and P. Strelan, “A construct validity analysis of the concept of psychological literacy,” Aust J Psychol, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 462–474, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00049530.2021.1922069.
W. Admiraal, M. Hoeksma, M. T. van de Kamp, and G. van Duin, “Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity,” Teach Teach Educ, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1019–1028, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.002.
Y. Y. and L. W. P. Richard P. Bagozzi, “Bogazzi_Assesing Construct Validity in Organiational Research,” Adm Sci Q, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 421–458, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393203
C. M. Burnett, “Reconsidering the Construct Validity of ‘Political Knowledge,’” Critical Review, vol. 28, no. 3–4, pp. 265–286, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/08913811.2016.1239805.
D. H. Rosenthal, B. L. Driver, and D. A. Waldman, “Construct validity of instruments measuring recreationists’ preferences,” Leis Sci, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89–108, Jan. 1982, doi: 10.1080/01490408209512995.
H. Dwi Susanti, P. C. Chang, and M. H. Chung, “Construct validity of the Menopause Rating Scale in Indonesia,” Climacteric, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 454–459, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1574737.
J. L. Berger and S. A. Karabenick, “Construct Validity of Self-Reported Metacognitive Learning Strategies,” Educational Assessment, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 19–33, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10627197.2015.1127751.
S. Dawadi and P. N. Shrestha, “Construct validity of the Nepalese school leaving english reading test,” Educational Assessment, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 102–120, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10627197.2018.1430511.
J. Wilmskoetter, H. Bonilha, I. Hong, R. J. Hazelwood, B. Martin-Harris, and C. Velozo, “Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10),” Disabil Rehabil, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 549–559, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.
S. Hadi, S. Maisaroh, A. Hidayat, and D. Andrian, “An Instrument Development to Evaluate Teachers’ Involvement in Planning the Schools’ Budgeting at Elementary Schools of Yogyakarta Province,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1087–1100, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15260a.
A. Wahyuni, L. A. Effendi, L. M. Angraini, and D. Andrian, “Developing instrument to increase students’ geometry ability based on Van Hiele level integrated with Riau Malay culture,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 208–217, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21831/pep.v24i2.33811.
D. Andrian, B. Kartowagiran, and S. Hadi, “The Instrument Development to Evaluate Local Curriculum in Indonesia,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 922–934, 2018, doi: 10.12973/iji.2016.9115a.
M. Mikolajczak, O. Luminet, C. Leroy, and E. Roy, “Psychometric properties of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, construct, and incremental validity in a French-speaking population,” J Pers Assess, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00223890701333431.
S. Hadi, D. Andrian, and B. Kartowagiran, “Evaluation model for evaluating vocational skills programs on local content curriculum in Indonesia: Impact of educational system in Indonesia,” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2019, no. 82, pp. 45–62, 2019, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2019.82.3.
A. Setiawan, D. Mardapi, and D. Andrian, “The Development of Instrument for Assessing Students’ Affective Domain Using Self-and Peer-Assessment Models,” 2019. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12326a.
U. Ravens-Sieberer et al., “Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1487–1500, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5.
M. Hajaroh, Rukiyati, L. A. Purwastuti, and R. Nurhayati, “Development of the evaluation instrument of the child-friendly school policy in elementary schools,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 327–340, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14319a.
D. Andrian, B. Kartowagiran, and S. Hadi, “The Instrument Development to Evaluate Local Curriculum in Indonesia,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 921–934, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11458a.
Z. Amir, Risnawati, E. Nurdin, M. Azmi, and D. Andrian, “The Increasing of Math Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Cooperative Learning Through Metacognitive,” International journal of instruction, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 841–856, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14448a.
Risnawati, D. Andrian, M. P. Azmi, Z. Amir, and E. Nurdin, “Development of a definition maps-based plane geometry module to improve the student teachers’ mathematical reasoning ability,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 541–560, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12333a.
L. M. Angraini, A. Susilawati, M. S. Noto, R. Wahyuni, and D. Andrian, “Augmented Reality for Cultivating Computational Thinking Skills in Mathematics Completed with Literature Review, Bibliometrics, and Experiments for Students,” Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 225–260, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.17509/ijost.v9i1.67258.
D. Andrian, A. Wahyuni, S. Ramadhan, F. R. E. Novilanti, and Zafrullah, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar, Sikap Sosial, dan Motivasi Belajar,” Inomatika, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2020, doi: 10.35438/inomatika.v2i1.163.
M. Van Dinther, F. Dochy, and M. Segers, “Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education,” Educ Res Rev, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003.
S. Liu and P. Hallinger, “Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Teacher Professional Learning in China: Testing a Mediated-Effects Model,” Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 501–528, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0013161X18769048.
R. H. Rafiola, P. Setyosari, C. L. Radjah, and M. Ramli, “The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 71–82, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12525.
K. Bartimote-Aufflick, A. Bridgeman, R. Walker, M. Sharma, and L. Smith, “The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1918–1942, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.999319.
E. Moreira-Fontán, M. García-Señorán, Á. Conde-Rodríguez, and A. González, “Teachers’ ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement,” Comput Educ, vol. 134, pp. 63–77, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007.
O. Hassan and A. Ibourk, “Burnout, self-efficacy and job satisfaction among primary school teachers in Morocco,” Social Sciences and Humanities Open, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100148.
H. Niemi and S. J. Niu, “Digital Storytelling Enhancing Chinese Primary School Students’ Self-Efficacy in Mathematics Learning,” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, vol. 15, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1834490921991432.
O. E. Hatlevik, I. Throndsen, M. Loi, and B. G. Gudmundsdotti, “Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships,” Computer and Education, vol. 118, no. March, pp. 107–119, 2017.
Nor. A. Ismail et al., “The Challenges of Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 towards the Teacher’s Self-Efficacy,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1529, no. 4, pp. 0–6, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042062.
S. I. E. Hölscher, N. Gharaei, M. K. Schachner, P. K. Ott, and S. Umlauft, “Do my students think I am racist? Effects on teacher self-efficacy, stress, job satisfaction and supporting students in culturally diverse classrooms,” Teach Teach Educ, vol. 138, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104425.
F. Çetin and D. Aşkun, “The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation,” Management Research Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 186–201, 2018, doi: 10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062.
N. A. Ismail and N. A. Wahid, “Empowering the Self-Efficacy of Teachers in Malaysia through the Academic Revolution 4.0,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 11, 2018, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i11/4966.
. Risnawati, Z. Amir, M. S. Lubis, M. Syafri, and D. Andrian, “The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Increasing Student Creative Thinking and Self-efficacy,” no. ICoSEEH 2019, pp. 152–156, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0009096701520156.
A. Alhadabi, S. Aldhafri, H. Alkharusi, I. Al-Harthy, M. Alrajhi, and H. AlBarashdi, “Modelling parenting styles, moral intelligence, academic self-efficacy and learning motivation among adolescents in grades 7–11,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 133–153, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2019.1575795.
Z. Luo and H. Li, “Competence, preparation, and relaxation: Contributing factors to EFL student teachers’ self-efficacy and teaching performance in microteaching training,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26216.
A. Gröschner, A. K. Schindler, D. Holzberger, M. Alles, and T. Seidel, “How systematic video reflection in teacher professional development regarding classroom discourse contributes to teacher and student self-efficacy,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 90, no. February, pp. 223–233, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.02.003.
O. Simsek and T. Yazar, “Examining the self-efficacy of prospective teachers in technology integration according to their subject areas: The case of turkey,” Contemp Educ Technol, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 289–308, 2019, doi: 10.30935/cet.590105.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Masrianti Fadillah, Tengku Abdani Murazanty, Ranny Mukerdi, Rahmadini Fitri, Fitri Nur Ashari, Indra Saputra, Annisah Zaeri, Akbar Septiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright @Author. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Copyrights of all materials published in the Mathematics Research and Education Journal are freely available without charge to users or / institutions.
Accepted 2024-11-03
Published 2024-11-04





