How Learning Interest, Motivation, and Outcome of Students in Learning Mathematics; The Comparative Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic and New Normal

Mawaddaturrohmah

doi:10.25299/mrej.2022.vol6(2).10795

Authors

Mawaddaturrohmah Al-Ihsan Islamic Boarding School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/mrej.2022.vol6(2).10795

Abstract

Interest, motivation, and learning outcomes always become the best variables in determining education success because these variables are the determiner factors in every element of education programs. This study compares interest, motivation, and learning outcomes between the COVID-19 pandemic and the new normal. This research is quantitative. The study population was all students at SMP Al-Ikhsan Boarding School, while the sample was two classes taken purposively. The research instrument was a structured observation sheet. The analytical technique used is descriptive statistics and independent-sample t-test. The analysis results show differences in motivation, interest, and student learning outcomes between the time of the pandemic and post-covid-19 pandemic with a significant 0.00.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Yerdelen and S. Sungur, “Multilevel Investigation of Students’ Self-regulation Processes in Learning Science: Classroom Learning Environment and Teacher Effectiveness,” Int J Sci Math Educ, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 89–110, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9921-z.

Z. Erwen, Z. Wenming, and J. Chengxing, “SPOC-based Flipped Classroom of College English : Construction of an Effective Learning Model Elements in effective English learning environment,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/download/7513/4752

R. White and N. Warfa, “Building Schools of Character: A Case-Study Investigation of Character Education’s Impact on School Climate, Pupil Behavior, and Curriculum Delivery,” J Appl Soc Psychol, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00701.x.

A. Cooley, “Legislating Character: Moral Education in North Carolina’s Public Schools,” Educ Stud, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 188–205, 2008, doi: 10.1080/00131940802117563.

S. You, E. K. Kim, S. A. Lim, and M. Dang, “Student and Teacher Characteristics on Student Math Achievement,” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1834490921991428.

T. Lickona, Educating for character: how our school can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books, 1991.

M. W. Berkowitz and M. C. Bier, “Research Based Character Education,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 591, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2004, doi: 10.1177/0002716203260082.

L. Tisu, D. Lupșa, D. Vîrgă, and A. Rusu, “Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health the mediating role of work engagement,” Pers Individ Dif, vol. 153, no. December 2018, pp. 153–158, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109644.

L. Shen, M. Wang, and R. Shen, “Affective e-Learning: Using ‘motional’ data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 176–189, 2009.

R. A. Carter, M. Rice, S. Yang, and H. A. Jackson, “Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning,” Information and Learning Science, vol. 121, no. 5–6, pp. 311–319, 2020, doi: 10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0114.

J. Wong, M. Baars, D. Davis, T. van der Zee, G. J. Houben, and F. Paas, “Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review,” Int J Hum Comput Interact, vol. 35, no. 4–5, pp. 356–373, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084.

Y. Shi, M. Tong, and T. Long, “Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study,” Comput Educ, vol. 168, p. 104193, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193.

T. Rasch and W. Schnotz, “Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments : Effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency,” Learn Instr, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 411–422, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.008.

H. K. Yau and A. L. Cheng, “The Effectiveness of ‘Financial Planning and Control’ in School-Based Management,” e-Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 49–62, 2011.

A. M. Iversen, A. S. Pedersen, L. Krogh, and A. A. Jensen, “Learning, leading, and letting go of control: Learner-led approaches in education,” Sage Open, vol. 5, no. 4, 2015, doi: 10.1177/2158244015608423.

P. R. Pintrich, “A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 667–686, 2003, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.

Y.-D. Lee and C.-T. Kuo, “Principals’ Transformational Leadership and Teachers’ Work Motivation: Evidence From Elementary Schools in Taiwan,” The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 90–113, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijoi-online.org/

M. Rodríguez, I. Díaz, E. J. Gonzalez, and M. González-Miquel, “Motivational active learning: An integrated approach to teaching and learning process control,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2019.

D. Bye, D. Pushkar, and M. Conway, “Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students.,” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 57, pp. 141–158., 2007.

E. Parkerson, “Using A Motivational General-Mastery Imagery Intervention to Improve the Self-Efficacy Of Youth Gymnasts,” p. 100, 2015.

D. L. Hakim, U. S. Sa’ud, A. Komariah, and C. Sunaengsih, “Teachers’ teaching performance: Pedagogical competence, work motivation, school culture and profession allowance,” in Educational Administration Innovation for Sustainable Development, 1st Editio., 2018, p. 6.

A. Pangemanan, “Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach on Statistics Material Against Student Results,” International Education Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–7, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.5539/ies.v13n4p1.

H. C. Hill, D. L. Ball, C. Hill, and D. Loewenberg, “for Teaching : Learning Mathematics Results from California ’ s Mathematics Professional Development Institutes,” vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 330–351, 2004.

A. Tarvainen and H. Valpola, “Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results,” Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017.

C. K. R. C. Jackson, A. Johnson, and C.Persico, “The effect of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcome: Evidence from School Finance Reform,” Quartely Journal of Economic, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 157-218., 2015.

M. H. Lin, H. C. Chen, and K. S. Liu, “A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3553–3564, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a.

D. Maclinton and D. Andrian, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Prisma Berbasis Macromedia Flash Dengan Desain Pembelajaran Assure,” Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 83–97, 2022, doi: 10.35438/inomatika.v4i1.323.

S. Rezeki, D. Andrian, and Y. Safitri, “Mathematics and cultures: A new concept in maintaining cultures through the development of learning devices,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 375–392, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14322a.

W. Gusfitri, A. Abdurrahman, D. Andrian, N. Nofriyandi, and S. Rezeki, “Development of Mathematics Learning Tools Based on Ethnomathematics on Rectangular and Triangles in Junior High School,” Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 609, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5310.