The Mitigation of Risk Management: Non-Productive Time Analysis on Drilling Operations in ZY Field

Muhammad Ariyon; Bobby Rahman; Ellyan Sastraningsih; Anthony Mayes

doi:10.25299/jgeet.2024.9.2.15261

Authors

Muhammad Ariyon Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jalan Kaharuddin Nst No. 113 Marpoyan, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
Bobby Rahman Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jalan Kaharuddin Nst No. 113 Marpoyan, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
Ellyan Sastraningsih Faculty of Economic and Bussines, Islamic University of Riau, Jalan Kaharuddin Nst No. 113 Marpoyan, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
Anthony Mayes Faculty of Economic and Bussines Riau University, Jalan. HR Soebrantas KM. 12.5, Simpang Baru, Binawidya, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/jgeet.2024.9.2.15261

Keywords:

Non-Productive Time, Oil and Gas, Drilling, Hydrocarbons, Mitigation, Risk Management

Abstract

Currently, petroleum is still the main energy source in Indonesia. However, since the 1990s, Indonesia began to experience a decline in oil production and an increase in domestic energy demand, which caused Indonesia to import oil to meet domestic energy needs. Through SKK Migas, Indonesia has a target to produce 1 million barrels per day by 2030, with one of the efforts being undertaken by carrying out massive and aggressive drilling. Drilling is the most critical, dangerous, complex and expensive operation in the oil and gas industry. It cannot be denied that in reality many unplanned problems (unscheduled events) which result in non-productive time (NPT) are encountered during drilling operations which sometimes cause unpredictable budget usage and can also result in delays in hydrocarbon production. This research was carried out by analyzing 50 wells that had been drilled in the BR field. In this research, a risk management process was carried out for the NPT categories to determine the level of risk in each NPT category and develop a mitigation analysis to reduce the NPT. Dealing with the finding, it indicates that the NPT rig moving (RMV) and drilling 8-1/2 (DRLG 8-1/2) categories have a red risk level which means unacceptable. The biggest contribution to NPT in the RMV category is location problems, while for DRLG 8-1/2 it is loss of circulation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alsalat, A., 2016. Performance Measurement and Efficiency Improvement for Onshore Drilling Rigs Operated by OMV Affidavit 134.

Baek, J., 2021. The role of crude oil prices in the movement of the Indonesian rupiah: a quantile ARDL approach. Econ. Chang. Restruct. 54, 975–994.

Barakat, M., Abu El Ela, M., Khalaf, F., 2021. Integrating risk management concepts into the drilling non-productive time. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 11, 887–900.

Eren, T., 2018. Drilling time follow-up with non-productive time monitoring. Int. J. Oil, Gas Coal Technol. 19, 197–216.

Hossain, M.E., Islam, M.., n.d. Drilling Engineering Problems and Solutions.

IADC, 2019. Main Codes of the IADC DDR PlusTM 1–4.

Jyoti Modak, N., Kalita, D., Bakul Barua, P., 2017. Minimization of Non Productive Time in Drilling Rig Operation. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 44, 48–52.

Khalaf, F., Ela, M.A. El, 2008. SPE 111580 The Risk Management Process – An Overview The Human Factor in Risk : A Major Source of Uncertainty 15–17.

Krygier, N., Solarin, A., Orozova-Bekkevold, I., 2020. A drilling company’s perspective on non-productive time NPT due to well stability issues. Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Norw. Subsurf. Conf. 2020.

Migas, B.S., 2022. Pengeboran Masif, Mengejar Target 2022.

Migas, S., 2020. Laporan Tahunan SKK MIgas Tahun 2019.

Muhammad Ariyon, Bella Santika, Fitrianti, 2022. Economic Feasibility Analysis of Fishing Job Operation in Well YS13. J. Geosci. Eng. Environ. Technol. 7, 189–195.

Ngarayana, I.W., Sutanto, J., Murakami, K., 2021. Predicting the future of Indonesia: Energy, economic and sustainable environment development. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 753.

Novrianti, N., Melisa, R., Adrian, R., 2017. Kick-Off Point (KOP) and End of Buildup (EOB) Data Analysis in Trajectory Design. J. Geosci. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2, 133.

Novrianti, N., Novriansyah, A., Khalid, I., Amani, Z.D., 2022. Laboratory Study On The Utilization of Jackruit Skin Waste Into Car-boxymethyl Cellulose and Their Effect On The Rheological Properties Of Drilling Mud. J. Geosci. Eng. Environ. Technol. 7, 59–68.

Rabia, H., 2002. Well Engineering & Construction Hussain Rabia 1 to 789.

Rita, N., Khalid, I., Efras, M.R., 2019. Drilling mud performances consist of CMC made by carton waste and Na2CO3 for reducing lost circulation. Mater. Today Proc. 39, 1099–1102.

Rovig, J.W., 1992. Air Drilling Handbook. Oiltools Int.

Saptarini, D.A., Nainggolan, Y.A., 2022. Risk Management in Oil and Gas Field Development Project with Marginal Resources: A Case in Mature Field in East Kalimantan. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 7, 45–53.

Saraswati, G.F., Ginting, M., Simorangkir, 2015. Analisa Waktu Yang Tidak Produktif (Npt) Pada Operasi Pemboran Sumur Lepas Pantai “Nb-Aaa” Lapangan Xy, Total E&P Indonesia Kalimantan Timur. Semin. Nas. Cendekiawan 2015 21, 455–463.