The Intersection of Gender, Culture, and Metacognitive Reading Strategies in Iranian EFL Education: A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Pursuit of Inclusion and Equity
Keywords:
Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Gender, EFL Reading, Inclusion, Sociocultural TheoryAbstract
In English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, metacognitive reading strategies (MRS) play a crucial role in learners' reading comprehension. This mixed-methods study investigated MRS among 178 Iranian EFL learners, focusing on gender and sociocultural dimensions. Utilizing an explanatory sequential design, participants—116 females and 62 males—were randomly sampled from two universities in Neyshabur, Iran. For the quantitative phase, a descriptive-correlational design using the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) and the TOEFL iBT reading section was employed. Descriptive analysis revealed nuanced differences in the use of MRS among Iranian EFL learners across genders, with an overall higher application by females (M = 3.61) compared to males (M = 3.44). In Support Reading Strategies, females demonstrated a higher application of strategies (M = 3.87) compared to males (M = 3.68). For Problem-Solving Strategies, female learners exhibited more frequent usage (M = 3.72) than their male counterparts (M = 3.46). Additionally, in Global Reading Strategies, there is a slight gender differential, with females showing a higher average score (M = 3.37) as opposed to males (M = 3.26). Independent samples t-tests revealed gender-specific differences in the overall MRS application, particularly in the subcategories of support and problem-solving strategies (p < .05), favoring females. In the qualitative phase, 12 participants were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis identified gender disparities exacerbated particularly by implicit teacher biases and sociocultural factors. These qualitative results corroborated and enriched the quantitative data, especially regarding gender-specific variations in MRS usage.
Downloads
References
Al-khresheh, M. H. & Al Basheer Ben Ali, R. (2023). A mixed method study on the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies used by Saudi EFL students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202321535
Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL learners' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11220a
Algraini, F. N. (2022). The relationship of metacognitive reading strategies used by Saudi EFL learners and their emotional intelligence. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 11(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v11i1.4440
Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K. (2011). An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p151
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463659.pdf
Aziz, Z. A., Nasir, C., & Ramazani, R. (2019). Applying metacognitive strategies in comprehending English reading texts. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 19(1), 138-159. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i1.1863
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (Vol. 2). Watertown, MA: Pathfinder international. https://cnxus.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Boyce_In20Depth20Interviews.pdf
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL quarterly, 23(4), 647-678. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587536
Cekiso, M. (2016). Gender differences in the reading comprehension of grade three rural learners in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(2), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890458
Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1051
Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.818
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (Vol. 1195). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1086/345281
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 31(4), 388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Dhanapala, K. V. (2010). Sri Lankan university students’ metacognitive awareness of L2 reading strategies. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 16(1), 65-82. https://www.academia.edu/download/70617275/JIDC_16-1_65.pdf
Sasani, N., Ganji, M., & Yarahmadzehi, N. (2018). English major students’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies: gender and academic level in focus. Issues in Language Teaching, 7(2), 91-119. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2019.46700.428
Ghafar Samar, R., & Dehqan, M. (2013). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67-80.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700280
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069
Köse, N., & Günes, F. (2021). Undergraduate Students' Use of Metacognitive Strategies While Reading and the Relationship between Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p99
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, M. L. (2012). A study of the selection of reading strategies among genders by EFL college students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.037
Louiza, C., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Metacognitive awareness and perceived use of reading strategies in academic reading comprehension: case of Algerian EFL students. El-Quari ‘e Journal of Literary and Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 750-763. http://dspace.univ-eloued.dz/handle/123456789/16659
Mahasneh, A. M., Alkhawaldeh, M. F., & Almakanin, H. A. (2016). Assessing students' meta-cognitive awareness reading strategies in Jordan. North American Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 229-238. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t53192-000
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 249. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ645740
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Richard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students' reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a
Oda, A. H., & Abdul-Kadhim, M. R. (2017). The relationship between gender and reading comprehension at college level. Journal of Basrah Research: The Humanities Sciences, 42(6), 426-442. https://doi.org/10.33762/0694-042-006-019
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Plonsky, L. (2023). Sampling and generalizability in Lx research: A second-order synthesis. Languages, 8(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010075
Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, (11), 29-40.
Rabadi, R. I., Al-Muhaissen, B., & Al-Bataineh, M. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies use by English and French foreign language learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 12(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.12.2.7
Rao, S. P. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English. 4(1), 65-79. https://www.rjoe.org.in/Files/vol4issue1/new/OK%20RJOE-Srinu%20sir(65-79)%20rv.pdf
Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72006
Rianto, A. (2021b). Examining gender differences in reading strategies, reading skills, and English proficiency of EFL University students. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1993531. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1993531
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Shikano, M. (2013). A quantitative survey on metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in English by Japanese university students. International Education Centre Journal, 14, 11-24.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Sage Publications Ltd. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-017
Sutiyatno, S. (2019). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Achievement. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 438-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0904.11
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd
Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 314-336. https://www.readingmatrix.com/files/11-24o5q41u.pdf
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322
Turner III, D. W., & Hagstrom-Schmidt, N. (2022). Qualitative interview design. Howdy or Hello? Technical and professional communication.
Warfield, R., Laribee, R., & W Geyer, R. (2013). Examining results and establishing benchmark data from the TOEFL ITP test. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 5(3), 191-198.
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 396(12), 111-121. https://www.academia.edu/download/33625563/Thinking_metacognitively_about_Metacognition_Toward_dynamic_metacognitive_sytems_perspectives.Zhang-Zhang2013.pdf
Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v10n12013/zhang.pdf
Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264510
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Mahdi Ghadamgahi, Narjes Ghafournia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made. All of the remixes, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.
