Using Interactive Language Development Tools to Enhance Cognitive and Literacy Skills in K-12 Education
Keywords:
Interactive language tools, ChatGPT, K-12 education, Language learning, Cognitive development, Language proficiency, Educator perceptionsAbstract
The incorporation of interactive language technologies, such as ChatGPT, into K-12 education has sparked interest as a way to improve language acquisition and cognitive development. This qualitative study investigates the perspectives and experiences of educators enrolled in the Advanced Teaching MEd program who have implemented ChatGPT in their language classes. The study investigates the influence of ChatGPT on language competence, cognitive skills, and literacy development using educator interviews, classroom observations, and a comprehensive literature analysis. The findings underscore ChatGPT's dynamic and interactive nature, which encourages active involvement, knowledge production, and tailored support in the zone of proximal growth. Furthermore, the study demonstrates how ChatGPT improves language proficiency by offering authentic language experiences, timely feedback, and exposure to a variety of linguistic structures. ChatGPT integration helps students become confident communicators and teachers construct dynamic classes that adapt to specific learning needs. Future research should look at the long-term impact of interactive language tools, the importance of teacher training, and the cultural and socioeconomic aspects that influence their use and efficacy. This work adds to the continuing efforts to improve language learning outcomes in K-12 education by increasing our understanding of how interactive language tools can boost cognitive development and language competency.
Downloads
References
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.
AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). Chatgpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68.
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023.
Alkhezzi, F., & Al-Dousari, W. (2016). The Impact of Mobile Learning on ESP Learners' Performance. Journal of Educators Online, 13(2), 73-101.
Alshahrani, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2029-2040.
Alt, D., Kapshuk, Y., & Dekel, H. (2023). Promoting perceived creativity and innovative behavior: Benefits of future problem-solving programs for higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101201.
Anis, M. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Inclusive English Language Teaching: Strategies and Implications for Learner Diversity. Journal of Multi-disciplinary Educational Research, 12(6).
Antar, D. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT4 in Creative Writing in Arabic: Poetry and Short Story as a Model.
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI.
Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain‐X, 1(3), e30.
Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358.
Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023). Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6), e2218523120.
Bishop, L. (2023). Can ChatGPT'Think Like a Lawyer?'. A Socratic Dialogue. A Socratic Dialogue (January 26, 2023).
Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic collaborators (pp. 25-50). Routledge.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161-182.
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in chatgpt: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444-452.
Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607.
de Winter, J. C. (2023). Can ChatGPT pass high school exams on English language comprehension. Researchgate. Preprint.
Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70-88.
Filippi, S. (2023). Measuring the impact of ChatGPT on fostering concept generation in innovative product design. Electronics, 12(16), 3535.
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Chemical Education.
Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (2023). Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning: A cross-disciplinary conversation. In Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1-24). Routledge.
Hwang, K. H., Heywood, D., & Carrier, J. (2023). The Implementation of ChatGPT-assisted Writing Instruction in ESL/EFL Classrooms. 새한영어영문학, 65(3), 83-106.
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115.
Keengwe, J. (Ed.). (2023). Creative AI Tools and Ethical Implications in Teaching and Learning. IGI Global.
Kılınç, S. (2023). Embracing the Future of Distance Science Education: Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT Integration.
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring Applications of ChatGPT to English Language Teaching: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3).
Küchemann, S., Steinert, S., Revenga, N., Schweinberger, M., Dinc, Y., Avila, K. E., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT support prospective teachers in physics task development?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020128.
Kurvers, J., Van de Craats, I., & Van Hout, R. (2015). Footprints for the future: Cognition, literacy and second language learning by adults. Adult literacy, second language, and cognition, 7-32.
Lee, G. G., Shi, L., Latif, E., Gao, Y., Bewersdorf, A., Nyaaba, M., ... & Zhai, X. (2023). Multimodality of ai for education: Towards artificial general intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06037.
Mallett, M. (2010). Choosing and using fiction and non-fiction 3-11: a comprehensive guide for teachers and student teachers. Routledge.
Marbun, T. O. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, and Critical Thinking Method for Academic Assignment at Theological Higher Education.
Maspul, K. A. (2023). Maximizing Multiple Intelligences for Unprecedented Academic Achievement. Cognitive Development Journal, 1(2), 53-59.
McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology, 18(3), 1-9.
McVeigh, N. (2023). Building Peace through Communication in an English Language Classroom at a Higher Education Institution. In RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2023 (No. 0253). Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
Mejia, M., & Sargent, J. M. (2023). Leveraging Technology to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 00472395231166613.
Meron, Y., & Araci, Y. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in design education: evaluating ChatGPT as a virtual colleague for post-graduate course development. Design Science, 9, e30.
Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J. K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for teachers: Practical examples for utilizing artificial intelligence for educational purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.
Nikolajeva, M. (2015). Children's literature comes of age: toward a new aesthetic. Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge.
Pitso, T. (2023). Post-COVID-19 Higher Learning: Towards Telagogy, A Web-Based Learning Experience. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(2).
Popp, M. S. (2006). Teaching language and literature in elementary classrooms: A resource book for professional development. Routledge.
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.
Rehman, U., Iqbal, F., & Shah, M. U. (2023). Exploring differences in ethical decision-making processes between humans and ChatGPT-3 model: a study of trade-offs. AI and Ethics, 1-11.
Rodríguez, D., Carrasquillo, A., & Lee, K. S. (2014). The bilingual advantage: Promoting academic development, biliteracy, and native language in the classroom. Teachers College Press.
Roza, V., & Zulhirawati, Z. (2023). Higher Students’ Perception of Using Chat GPT in Translating English Texts. BiCED Proceeding, 1, 64-73.
Sarı, U., Hassan, A. H., Güven, K., & Şen, Ö. F. (2017). Effects of the 5E teaching model using interactive simulation on achievement and attitude in physics education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(3).
Siiman, L. A., Rannastu-Avalos, M., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., & Pedaste, M. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: An Example from Collaborative Problem-Solving Discourse Data. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 87-96). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Singh, M., SB, V., & Malviya, N. (2023). Mind meets machine: Unravelling GPT-4's cognitive psychology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11436.
Supriyadi, E., & Kuncoro, K. S. (2023). Exploring the future of mathematics teaching: Insight with ChatGPT. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 305-316.
Taveekitworachai, P., & Thawonmas, R. (2023). Enhancing Novelty in ChatGPT Responses: Incorporating Random Word Brainstorming. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (pp. 1-7).
Vázquez-Cano, E., Ramirez-Hurtado, J. M., Saez-Lopez, J. M., & Lopez-Meneses, E. (2023). ChatGPT: The brightest student in the class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101380.
Verenikina, I. (2003). Vygotsky's socio-cultural theory and the zone of proximal development.
Vinther, J. (2012). Cognitive skills through CALL-enhanced teacher training. In Computer-Enhanced and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Emerging Issues and Trends (pp. 158-187). IGI global.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., ... & Gui, T. (2023). The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864.
Yee, K., Whittington, K., Doggette, E., & Uttich, L. (2023). ChatGPT Assignments to Use in Your Classroom Today.
Zhai, C. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100134.
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553-586.
Published
Versions
- 2024-02-29 (2)
- 2024-02-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Kurniawan Arif Maspul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made. All of the remixes, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.
