Kesantunan Tuturan Interogatif dalam Acara Online Media Gathering Dampak Covid-19 pada Petani Sawit RSPO dI Youtube

Authors

  • Lusiana Marbun Universitas Islam Riau
  • Herwandi Herwandi Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/j-lelc.2021.6237

Keywords:

interrogative speech, politeness principle

Abstract

The objectives of this study are 1) to describe, analyze and interpret the interrogative speech contained in the online media gathering event of the impact of covid-19 on RSPO oil palm farmers on YouTube and 2) to describe, analyze and interpret the principles of politeness in every interrogative way at the event. online media gathering about the impact of covid-19 on RSPO oil palm farmers on youtube. This research is classified as a qualitative descriptive study. Data collection in this study is related to the following matters: 1) documentation techniques, 2) listening techniques, and 3) note taking techniques. Sources of data in this study are the speeches of presenters and resource persons, while the data in this study are interrogative speeches spoken by the emcees and speakers. In accordance with the problems in the study, namely, ordering, interrogative and maxim of the principle of politeness, the results of this are 1) by adding the word "what" or "what" according to 28 utterances, 2) by reversing the order of 8 words of speech, 3) by using the word "not" or "no" 3 utterances, 4) by changing the intonation of the sentence 9 utterances, 5) by using 17 interrogative words. Meanwhile, from the maxims of politeness principles: 1) desire maxima 12 utterances, 2) maxim of generosity the desired result is 1 speech, maxim of appreciation 4 utterances, 5) maxim of consensus desire 44 utterances, and 6) maxim sympathy desire 2 utterances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaer, Abdul. (2008). Bahasa Indonesia (Pendekatan Proses). Jakarta: Riheneka Cipta.

Alwi, Hasan, dkk. 2003. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Zulfadhli, M., Asnawi, & Hardani, M. (2017). Peran Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Bahasa Perdagangan di Era MEA. The 1st Education and Language International Conference, 508–515. http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ELIC/article/view/1267

Chaer, Abdul. 2012. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Nadar. FX. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Chaer dan Agustina. 2010. Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Darma, Yoce A. 2014. Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Dewa dan Muhammad. 2010. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 2010. Wacana Pemahaman dan Hubungan antar Unsur. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Habiburrahman, Rudi Arahman. 2018. Kesantunan Tindak Tutur Introgatif Dosen dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas: Studi Kasus di Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FKIP UM Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Telaah. Vol 3, No 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/telaah.v3i2.605

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2008. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tarigan, Henrry guntur 2009. Pengajaran Wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Lubis, Hamid Hasan. 2011. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sudaryat, Yayat. 2008. Makna Dalam Wacana. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Sumarlam, 2003. Analisis Wacana: Teori dan Prakti. Surakarta: Pustaka Cara.

Suprihadi. 2009. Trik Termudah Menguasai Bahasa Indoneisa. Surabaya: Mitra Jaya.

Published

2021-02-02

How to Cite

Marbun, L., & Herwandi, H. (2021). Kesantunan Tuturan Interogatif dalam Acara Online Media Gathering Dampak Covid-19 pada Petani Sawit RSPO dI Youtube. J-LELC: Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 1(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.25299/j-lelc.2021.6237