Media Literacy, Public Trust, and Audience Skepticism in Hyperlocal Homeless Media: A Content Analysis of Community Instagram Accounts in Bengkulu, Indonesia
Keywords:
media literacy, public trust, audience skepticism, hyperlocal homeless media, community journalism, instagram-based newsAbstract
The expansion of hyperlocal “homeless media” on social media has transformed how local communities access information, evaluate news, and negotiate trust in public institutions. This study investigates media literacy, public trust, and audience skepticism within hyperlocal homeless media in Bengkulu, Indonesia, focusing on community-managed Instagram accounts. Using qualitative content analysis, the research examines user comments posted on two influential accounts, Bengkulu Info and Info Bengkulu Raya, across issues of crime, social welfare, infrastructure, and public service provision.The findings indicate that audience trust in hyperlocal Instagram news is conditional and fragmented. Users depend on these accounts for fast, locally relevant updates, yet they frequently contest news framing, question institutional credibility, and criticize government performance. Media literacy emerges not only through fact-checking and corrections, but also through assessments of journalistic clarity, ethical implications, and reporting proportionality. In crime-related discussions, skepticism often escalates into moral panic and punitive attitudes, reflected in strong public support for coercive responses. Meanwhile, content on social welfare and public services tends to generate more empathetic engagement, although distrust toward political elites and bureaucratic actors remains persistent.This study argues that hyperlocal homeless media function as contested public arenas where trust and skepticism are continuously negotiated through participatory digital discourse. Audience skepticism, rather than signaling low media literacy, reflects active interpretation shaped by local experiences and institutional distrust.
Downloads
References
Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. Routledge.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
Hasyim, T., Kartika, Y., & Sari, R. A. (2025). Media construction of Enggano Island’s isolation: A comparative framing analysis of detikcom and Kompas.com using Entman’s model. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(11).
Hasyim, T., Pratama, M. A., Saputra, A., Mubarokah, A., Suryadi, A., & Aliwijaya, A. (2025). Tren penelitian tantangan profesi jurnalis di artificial intelligence: Analisis bibliometrik artikel terindeks Scopus tahun 2020–2025. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i1.3202
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427.
Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0113
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons.
Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Potter, W. J. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. Sage Publications.
Tapsell, R. (2017). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Taufik Hasyim, Yuliati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-01-28
Published 2025-12-31