PIDANA MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT KEADILAN (Kajian Putusan Nomor  5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022 )

Heni Susanti; Riadi Asra Rahmad

Authors

Heni Susanti
Riadi Asra Rahmad

Keywords:

Death Penalty;, Justice;, Verdict;

Abstract

The aim of this research is, firstly, how judges consider in deciding cases (Study of Decision Number 5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022), secondly, How the death penalty applies (Study of Decision Number 5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022), from the perspective of the philosophy of justice. This research uses a normative approach, namely by reviewing or analyzing secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the examination, the Judge was of the opinion that the Defendant and the Public Prosecutor's reasons for their cassation could not be corrected, the Judex Facti decision which stated that it was proven that the convict had committed the act of "Deliberately committing violence, forcing the Child to have sexual intercourse with him, which the Educator did, causing more than 1 (one) victim several times. ” and imposing the “death” penalty on the Defendant was appropriate and accompanied by sufficient consideration. The imposition of the death penalty for perpetrators of sexual violence, if only seen technically, means that the application of the death penalty is contrary to human rights as stated in Article 28A paragraph (1), 28I paragraph (1), in conjunction with Article 4 of Law Number 39 of 1999, in conjunction with article 3 of the UDHR. However, if studied contextually using extensive and theological interpretations, the actual application of the death penalty does not conflict with human rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Heni Susanti

The aim of this research is, firstly, how judges consider in deciding cases (Study of Decision Number 5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022), secondly, How the death penalty applies (Study of Decision Number 5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022), from the perspective of the philosophy of justice. This research uses a normative approach, namely by reviewing or analyzing secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the examination, the Judge was of the opinion that the Defendant and the Public Prosecutor's reasons for their cassation could not be corrected, the Judex Facti decision which stated that it was proven that the convict had committed the act of "Deliberately committing violence, forcing the Child to have sexual intercourse with him, which the Educator did, causing more than 1 (one) victim several times. ” and imposing the “death” penalty on the Defendant was appropriate and accompanied by sufficient consideration. The imposition of the death penalty for perpetrators of sexual violence, if only seen technically, means that the application of the death penalty is contrary to human rights as stated in Article 28A paragraph (1), 28I paragraph (1), in conjunction with Article 4 of Law Number 39 of 1999, in conjunction with article 3 of the UDHR. However, if studied contextually using extensive and theological interpretations, the actual application of the death penalty does not conflict with human rights.

References

Akib, Irwan, and Mas’ud Ibrahim. “J Urnal E Quilibrium J Urnal E Quilibrium.” Fenomena Sosial Pilihan Hidup Tidak Menikah Wanita Karier III, no. 1 (2016): 1–10. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/70308-ID-fenomena-plagiarisme-mahasiswa.pdf.

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Arief, Amelia. ““Problematika Penjatuhan Hukuman Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana.” Kosmik Hukum 19, no. 1 (2019): 2.

Bangun, Nata Sukam, and Paulinus Soge. “Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah, 2014, 1–17. jurnal.iain-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/download/65/67.

Diningrum, Wahyu, and Taun. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Perkara Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Pada Anak ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5642 K / Pid . Sus / 2022 ).” Journal of Social Science Research 3, no. 2 (2023): 3211–23.

Fauziyyah MS, Anis Nur, Diah Ayu Febrianti, Fella Fahita Ayu Mareza, Filzah Ilda Syafirah, and Istiqomah Istiqomah. “Analisis Penerapan Hukuman Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (Studi Kasus Herry Wirawan Putusan Nomor 86/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BDG).” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 12 (2022): 969–87. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i12.344.

Hukum, Fakultas, Universitas Udayana, A A Ngurah Oka, Yudistira Darmadi, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Udayana. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak” 11, no. 5 (2022).

Kantosa, Melia, Yoserwan Yoserwan, and Siska Elvandari. “Pemberlakuan Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hak Anak.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 1080–93.

Peter Mahmud marzuki. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Rosyadi, Imron, and Syamsul Fatoni. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 3 (2023): 337. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i3.540.

Sipayung, Baren, Sardjana Orba Manullang, and Henry Kristian Siburian. “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2023): 141.

Syafrizal, and Annisa Suryani Putri. “PANDANGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP KEKERASAN SEKSUAL KEPADA ANAK DI LINGKUNGAN PENDIDIKAN.” Jurnal Keadilan 3, no. 2 (2023): 17.

SYIYAM, ELA NUR. “DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK (Studi Analisis Putusan Nomor: 86/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Bdg.).” UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI PROF. K.H. SAIFUDDIN ZUHRI PURWOKERTO, 2023. https://repository.uinsaizu.ac.id/19688/1/Ela Nur Syiyam_Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak.pdf.

Yunanto, Yunanto. “Menerjemahkan Keadilan Dalam Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 2 (2019): 192. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.192-205.

Yurinonica, Aveidel Arven, Dirra Abu Khodijah, Rahmawati Widya, and Virginia Risang Nima Nima. “View of Hukuman Mati Herry Wirawan Dalam Perspektif HAM.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2022, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/moderasi.xxxxxxx.