Fenomena Serang Simbolik dalam Debat Publik di Pemilihan Umum 2024
The Phenomenon of Symbolic Attacks in Public Debates in 2024 Election
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.v13i1.21534Keywords:
Election, Presidential Candidate, Public Debate, SymbolicAbstract
The campaign stage in the implementation of the election is one of the important stages for election participants. This campaign stage conveys the vision, mission, and flagship programs of each presidential and vice-presidential candidate, one of which is presented through a public debate. The use of various political communication strategies in the campaign will be carried out by each candidate to gain support from the wider community, including a negative campaign approach. This research is qualitative research with a literature study approach. This research highlights the phenomenon of symbolic attacks in implementing the 3rd Public Debate, the 2024 election. This phenomenon is one of the political communication strategies in the campaign, to reduce the credibility of the candidate being attacked, thereby reducing public trust in the candidate. This study looks at the low level of public satisfaction with presidential candidate number 2 from his appearance in the third public debate. The low level of public satisfaction with presidential candidate number 2 is a sign that the symbolic attacks carried out by presidential candidates’ number 1 and 3 in the public debate are not just criticism of the performance of presidential candidate number 2, but also show the success of the symbolic attacks in influencing public perception. Meanwhile, this symbolic attack phenomenon can also cause prolonged polarization in society or between supporters, which ultimately affects community life in the social environment.
Downloads
References
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394
Darmawan, A. Z. S., Indrayati, I. I., & Goenawan, F. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Amerta Land Dalam Mengimplementasikan Program “Member Get Member.” Jurnal E-Komunikasi, 10(2), 1–12. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/ilmu-komunikasi/article/view/13171
Derung, T. N. (2017). Interaksionisme Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat. SAPA : Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral, 2(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.53544/sapa.v2i1.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53544/sapa.v2i1.33
Edwards. (2024). The Symbolic Interactionist View of Politics in Sociology. Easy Sociology. https://easysociology.com/sociological-perspectives/symbolic-interactionism/the-symbolic-interactionist-view-of-politics-in-sociology/
Haselmayer, M. (2019). Negative Campaigning and its Consequences: A Review and A Look Ahead. French Politics, 17(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum, 1 (2017).
Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 15 Tahun 2023 tentang Kampanye Pemilihan Umum, (2023).
Kurniawan, R. C. (2009). Kampanye Politik: Idealitas dan Tantangan. JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 12(3), 257–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10973
Mansyur, I. C. (2023). Polarisasi Politik di Indonesia 2014-2019: Sebuah Kajian Pustaka. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v11i1a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v11i1a1
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
Milliken, P. J., & Schreiber, R. (2012). Examining the Nexus Between Grounded Theory and Symbolic Interactionism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100510
Musyasaroh, S. (2013). Kampanye Perubahan Sosial (Kesadaran Masyarakat, Aspek Perubahan Kognitif dan Prilaku). Jurnal Heritage, 2(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35891/heritage.v2i1.831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35891/heritage.v2i1.831
Pramono, J., & Prianggodo, C. A. (2023). Analisis Efisiensi Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Pada Proyeksi Pelaksanaan Pemilu Serentak 2024 Di Indonesia. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 12(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v12i3.2663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v12i3.2663
Rahmaniah. (2021). Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Dalam Pemilu Di Indonesia. OSF Preprints, 7, 1–5. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yqzxk DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yqzxk
Sakti, R. E. (2024). Analisis Debat Capres: Persaingan Pertajam Diskursus soal Pertahanan. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2024/01/08/analisis-debat-capres-persaingan-pertajam-diskursus-soal-pertahanan
Salabi, A. (2018). Perihal Kampanye Negatif dan Kampanye Hitam, Apa Bedanya? Rumahpemilu.Org. https://rumahpemilu.org/perihal-kampanye-negatif-dan-kampanye-hitam-apa-bedanya/
Sukma, F., Cangara, H., & Saifulloh, M. (2023). Kampanye Politik Sebagai Politik Pemasaran: Tinjauan Atas Pemilihan Umum Calon Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2019. Mimbar Kampus: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Agama Islam, 23(1), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.47467/mk.v23i1.4329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47467/mk.v23i1.4329
Sumual, A. K., Lontaan, M., & Supit, Y. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pemilu Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Undang Undang Dasar 1945. Journal of Law and Nation (JOLN), 2(2), 103–112. https://joln.org/index.php/joln/article/view/32
Sutisna, A. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Non-Elektoral Potensi Pemicu Konflik Pemilu Tahun 2024. Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 5(1), 94–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v5i1.964
Wibowo, K. (2023). Kampanye Partisipatif Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024. Jurnal Bawaslu DKI Jakarta, 8(3), 109–118. https://journal.bawaslu.go.id/index.php/JBDKI/article/view/401
Yusri, A., & Adlin. (2012). Pengaruh Kampanye Negatif Dan Kampanye Hitam Terhadap Pilihan Pemilih Pada Pemungutan Suara Ulang (PSU) Pemilihan Walikota Dan Wakil Walikota Pekanbaru Tahun 2011. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(17), 10. https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v11i1.1609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v11i1.1609
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Medium

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



