The Dynamics Of Theoretical Approaches In Contemporary Public Administration Studies:  Critical Analysis And Policy Implications

Nurman Nurman; Zainal Zainal; Ardiansyah Ardianyah

doi:10.25299/jkp.2024.vol10(2).21508

Authors

Nurman Universitas islam riau
Zainal Universitas Islam Riau
Ardiansyah Universitas Islam Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/jkp.2024.vol10(2).21508

Keywords:

Dynamics of theoretical, Contemporary, Public Administration, Critical Analysis and Policy Implication

Abstract

Public administration serves as a central pillar in the governance system, responsible for designing, implementing, and evaluating public policies. In the modern context, public administration has undergone significant transformation in response to the ever-evolving dynamics of social, political, economic, and technological developments. Globalization and digitalization, as well as the complexity of public problems, demand a more adaptive, innovative, and evidence-based public administration system. Research methodology plays an important role in determining the validity and reliability of scientific findings in public administration studies. Choosing the right method not only ensures the accuracy of the data collected but also increases the relevance of the analysis in answering research questions. In this context, a qualitative approach with descriptive and exploratory analysis was chosen to understand the concepts, patterns, and dynamics of the evolution of public administration theory in facing contemporary challenges. Critical Analysis of Contemporary Approaches in Public Administration. The evolution of public administration theory has been marked by a series of paradigms, each contributing unique insights into governance and service delivery. The Classical Public Administration (CPA) model, rooted in Max Weber's bureaucratic principles, emphasizes hierarchical organization, rule-based efficiency, and accountability. Impact of Theoretical Approaches on Policy Effectiveness and Governance. The impact of theoretical approaches on policy effectiveness and governance is profound, as these frameworks shape administrative structures, decision-making processes, and citizen engagement. Conclusion this study confirms that theoretical approaches in public administration continue to experience dynamic developments along with social, political, economic, and technological changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wibowo, Agusta Ari, and Indra Kertati. 2022. “Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik.” Public Service and Governance Journal.

Septiandika, V., Sucahyo, I., Rahmadi, A., & Fitria, N. (2022). Seminar dan pelatihan pada mahasiswa terkait identifikasi isu kebijakan dan penyusunan policy brief. Jurnal Cemerlang Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 5(1), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.31540/jpm.v5i1.1891

Seftyono, C. (2018). Politik kebijakan publik: pengantar untuk mahasiswa dan peneliti pemula (draft).. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qy6ns

Lestari, L. (2017). Civil society organizations di aras lokal. Jurnal Trias Politika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v1i2.1059

Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(6), 478-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550910982850

Manganti, G. (2023). Analisis partisipasi masyarakat dalam pelaksanaan kebijakan publik. DeCive, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v3i11.2053

Rachman, R. and Marijan, K. (2021). Kebijakan pemanfaatan media sosial dinas perpustakaan & kearsipan surabaya. Inovasi, 18(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.33626/inovasi.v18i1.280

Desrinelti, D., Afifah, M., & Gistituati, N. (2021). Kebijakan publik: konsep pelaksanaan. Jrti (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 6(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.29210/3003906000

Patarai, M. (2021). Desentralisasi kebijakan dalam otonomi daerah. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 1(11), 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v1i11.237

Zulfia, I., Endrawan, G., Rosika, C., Syamsi, S., & Frinaldi, A. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan inovasi daerah dalam peningkatan kinerja organisasi. Kebijakan Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, (Vol. 14 No. 2, Juni 2023). https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v14i2.6666

Vries, J. (2010). Is new public management really dead?. Oecd Journal on Budgeting, 10(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-10-5km8xx3mp60n

Sapuan, M. and Aras, M. (2024). Implementasi kebijakan publik program percepatan infrastruktur kelurahan (pik). Jurnal Pengabdian Ibnu Sina, 3(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.36352/j-pis.v3i2.862

Mujani, S. and Irvani, D. (2020). Sikap dan perilaku warga terhadap kebijakan penanganan wabah covid-19. Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.2.2020.219-238

Sumarsono, C., Muchsin, S., & Sunariyanto, S. (2022). Analisis model implementasi kebijakan publik pada pemerintah desa di kecamatan dau kabupaten malang. Publisia Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v7i2.8344

Suryono, A. (2018). Kebijakan publik untuk kesejahteraan rakyat. Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 6(2), 98-102. https://doi.org/10.31334/trans.v6i2.33

Amalia, S. (2018). Pemimpin baru dan tantangan peningkatan kualitas kebijakan publik. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v21i1.131

Alkhajar, E., Monalisa, M., Sari, S., & Luthfia, A. (2023). Dunia digital dan kebijakan publik: urgensi imunitas publik terhadap hoaks.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/evjax

Andhika, L. (2018). Meningkatkan kepercayaan publik terhadap pemerintah melalui redesain proses kebijakan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 3(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.3.1.2018.24-42

Safitri, U., Nuarizal, A., & Gistituati, N. (2021). Urgensi analisis kebijakan. Jrti (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 6(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.29210/3003818000

Aqsa, Q. and Nugroho, B. (2023). A literature review: cross-sector collaboration arrangements to deliver public services and goods. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 40, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8342

Brandsen, T. and Honingh, M. (2013). Professionals and shifts in governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(12), 876-883. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.798809

Dunleavy, P. (2005). New public management is dead--long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Edelenbos, J. and Meerkerk, I. (2016). Introduction: three reflecting perspectives on interactive governance.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479078.00006

Gurung, R. (2022). Pedagogical implications of gha͂tu folk dance in efl classes. Journal of Nelta Gandaki, 5(1-2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v5i1-2.49283

Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001

Osborne, S. (2006). The new public governance?1. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022

Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance?.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684

Osborne, S. and Radnor, Z. (2016). The new public governance and innovation in public services., 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316105337.003

Syam, H., Gani, H., Akib, H., Mukmin, A., & Bare, R. (2021). Public entrepreneurship.. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210928.112

Hammerschmid, G., Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. (2018). New public management reforms in europe and their effects: findings from a 20-country top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632

Iacovino, N., Barsanti, S., & Cinquini, L. (2015). Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: the case of the tuscany region. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x

Islam, M. and Ehsan, M. (2015). E-governance as a paradigm shift in public administration., 103-117. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch005

Janssen, M. and Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003

Jordan, T. and Battaglio, R. (2013). Are we there yet? the state of public human resource management research. Public Personnel Management, 43(1), 25-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013511064

Kalalo, E., Putri, I., Mariana, L., & Arifin, A. (2024). The influence of public administration science paradigm shift in its realization good governance. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (Jisop), 5(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v5i2.20185

Liu, S. and Yuan, Q. (2015). The evolution of information and communication technology in public administration. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1717

Molobela, T. and Uwizeyimana, D. (2023). E-governance as a new public administration paradigm: a rhetoric or reality?. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 12(8), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.2931

Mutiarin, D. and Misran, M. (2021). New public management new public comparison meta-analysis developed and developing country policies. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 5(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v5i2.3969

Osei‐Kojo, A. (2016). E‐government and public service quality in ghana. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1620

Tiika, B., Tang, Z., Azaare, J., Dagadu, J., & Otoo, S. (2024). Evaluating e-government development among africa union member states: an analysis of the impact of e-government on public administration and governance in ghana. Sustainability, 16(3), 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031333

Aneta, A., Aneta, Y., & Djafri, N. (2022). Pengembangan manajemen berbasis pelayanan administrasi publik pada tingkat pendidikan anak usia dini. Jurnal Obsesi Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 3669-3679. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2478

Aryanti, D. and Prasojo, E. (2021). Manajemen pengetahuan pada sektor publik: sebuah tinjauan literatur sistematis 2010-2021. Jurnal Academia Praja, 4(2), 333-357. https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v4i2.445

Edward, A., Adnan, M., & Khaidir, A. (2024). New public manajemen: studi kasus penerapan new public manajemen dalam organisasi publik di indonesia. future, 2(2), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.61579/future.v2i2.97

Haryani, T. and Puryatama, A. (2020). Pelayanan prima melalui penyelenggaraan mal pelayanan publik di indonesia. Kybernan Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan, 3(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.35326/kybernan.v1i1.580

Herizal, H., Mukhrijal, M., & Wance, M. (2020). Pendekatan akuntabilitas pelayanan publik dalam mengikuti perubahan paradigma baru administrasi publik. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 1(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v1i1.17327

Kurniawati, R., Lubis, A., Indrayana, S., Kurniawan, B., & Rahmawati, D. (2023). Rekonstruksi penelitian hukum administrasi negara melalui pendekatan bibliometrik: sebuah tinjauan komprehensif tentang perkembangan dan kontribusi literatur. Sanskara Hukum Dan Ham, 2(01), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v2i01.244

Mahardika, A. and Rizki, R. (2021). Analisis implementasi kebijakan penataan pasar tradisional dan toko modern di kota medan. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 2(10), 1647-1654. https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v2i10.431

Nurlelah, E., Hasan, F., & Situmorang, Y. (2023). Perancangan sistem informasi pelayanan administrasi terpadu satu pintu berbasis web. Jurnal Teknik Komputer, 9(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.31294/jtk.v9i1.13970

Ponto, I., Patty, J., & Sakir, A. (2024). Upaya pencegahan patologi birokrasi melalui penerapan good government untuk menciptakan birokrasi yang efisien. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 14(2), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.33592/jiia.v14i2.4952

Ramayanti, F. and Yuliani, F. (2022). Efektivitas dinas kependudukan dan pencatatan sipil kabupaten kuantan singingi dalam memberi pelayanan publik pada masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Niara, 15(2), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.31849/niara.v15i2.8887

Septiandika, V. and Aderovi, M. (2022). Efektivitas layanan cepat administrasi kecamatan guna mendorong lahirnya good governance. Populika, 10(2), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.37631/populika.v10i2.507

Setyaningsih, G. (2022). Perancangan aplikasi e-surat berbasis mobile pada pemerintahan desa kedunggede kecamatan lumbir. Jatisi (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi), 9(2), 1430-1448. https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v9i2.2128

Siregar, D., Simanjorang, E., & Prayoga, Y. (2023). Penyelenggaraan administrasi dalam mendukung good goverance. Munaddhomah Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(4), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v3i4.307

Supriyadi, E. (2021). Pergeseran dalam paradigma ilmu administrasi publik. Jurnal Rasi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.52496/rasi.v3i1.117

Sutangsa, S. (2024). Peran aparat administrasi publik dalam pencegahan korupsi: suatu analisis perspektif. The World of Public Administration Journal. https://doi.org/10.37950/wpaj.v5i2.1888

Tambotoh, J. and Gaol, F. (2023). Pemantauan berkelanjutan menggunakan process mining pada layanan publik digital.. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.668.c539

Tenrisau, A. (2021). Landasan pengelolaan pertanahan dalam sistem penataan agraria berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pertanahan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.53686/jp.v11i2.109

Zulkenedi, Z., Frinaldi, A., & Magriasti, L. (2023). Desentralisasi administratif untuk mewujudkan pelayanan publik dan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(6), 4326-4333. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i6.12595

Bergström, O. and Styhre, A. (2021). It takes change to remain the same: the transformation of swedish government policy making in economic crises and the involvement of social partners. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(4), 1564-1587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x211020801

Bhuiyan, S. and Perry, J. (2023). Building global public administration knowledge: leveraging the power of collaboration. Public Administration Review, 84(3), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13768

Bäck, H., Müller, W., & Nyblade, B. (2016). Multiparty government and economic policy-making. Public Choice, 170(1-2), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0373-0

Christensen, T. (2019). Organization theory and public administration.. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1439

Farazmand, A. and Balilaj, A. (2015). Does asia have a unique theory of public administration for all seasons? an exploratory essay. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(3), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2015.1087088

Kukovič, S. and Justinek, G. (2020). Modernisation trends in public administration in slovenia. Hrvatska I Komparativna Javna Uprava, 20(4), 623-647. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.4.2

Kusumasari, B., Sajida, S., Santoso, A., & Fauzi, F. (2023). The reinventing of public administration in the new hybrid world. Teaching Public Administration, 42(2), 206-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394231191927

Mykolaichuk, M., Shpektorenko, I., Pershko, L., Pasichnyi, R., Blishchuk, K., & Dzvinchuk, D. (2024). Innovative competences in public administration: the key to sustainable development, increasing financial efficiency and ensuring national security. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 1334-1343. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2250

Shon, C. and You, M. (2020). Evaluation of health policy governance in the introduction of the new drg-based hospital payment system from interviews with policy elites in south korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113757

Batubara, F., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2019). Unraveling transparency and accountability in blockchain., 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325262

Edelenbos, J., Meerkerk, I., & Schenk, T. (2016). The evolution of community self-organization in interaction with government institutions: cross-case insights from three countries. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016651142

Kadhum, O. and Hamad, A. (2023). Performance evaluation of multi-organization e-government based on hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. Ingénierie Des Systèmes D Information, 28(2), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.280227

Kamugumya, D. and Olivier, J. (2016). Health system’s barriers hindering implementation of public-private partnership at the district level: a case study of partnership for improved reproductive and child health services provision in tanzania. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1831-6

Khan, S., Shael, M., Majdalawieh, M., Nizamuddin, N., & Nicho, M. (2022). Blockchain for governments: the case of the dubai government. Sustainability, 14(11), 6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116576

Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2018). Group development stages in open government data engagement initiatives: a comparative case studies analysis., 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Riaz, B., Ali, L., Ahmad, S., Islam, M., Ahmed, K., & Hossain, S. (2020). Community clinics in bangladesh: a unique example of public-private partnership. Heliyon, 6(5), e03950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03950

Rumman, N. and Szilágyi, R. (2018). Overview of the electronic public services in agriculture in jordan. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2018.9.2.433

Sibanda, B., Basheka, B., & Romburgh, J. (2024). Enhancing governance through blockchain technology in the south african public sector. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.734

Yekimov, S. and Nianko, V. (2021). Using public-private partnerships to improve the efficiency of housing and communal services. E3s Web of Conferences, 281, 08010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128108010