Shadow State In The Management Of Shock Market In Marpoyan Damai Dictrict, Pekanbaru City (Study In Shock Market Pahlawan Kerja In Marpoyan Damai District)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/jkp.2021.vol7(2).12019Keywords:
Local strongmen, Shadows states, shock Market ManagementAbstract
This research examines Shadows state in Management of shock Market. Marpoyan Damai District, Pekanbaru City (Study in the Shock Market Heroes Work, Marpoyan Damai District). This study aims to determine the Shadow Statein the Management of the Shock Market in Marpoyan Damai District, Pekanbaru City (Study in the Shock Market in Heroes of Work, Marpoyan Damai District). This type of research, which is located in the shock market of Work Heroes,Marpoyan Peace districts, is descriptive with a qualitative method, namely research that seeks to describe the object or subject under study in accordance with what it is, and to explain variables and indicators. The results of the research on Shadow Government in the Management of the Shock Market in Marpoyan Peace District, Pekanbaru City (Study in the Shock Market Hero of Work, Marpoyan Damai District) were analyzed through three indicator indicators. the first is Social Control or social control of the Pekanbaru City Government, the Marpoyan Damai District Government, and the Maharatu Village Government have carried out social control through curbing the management of the shock market but for the management of the shock market itself, the actors involved are local strongmen who have influential authority in the environment. people who do have the land to establish or organize the shocked market. Both Defense Strategies found that the market shock persisted even though it did not have an official permit because the market was able to meet the basic needs that were really needed by the community so that people prefer to make buying and selling transactionsin the shock market rather than the official market managed by the Pekanbaru City Government. Third Development of Local Existence, it is found that the local government is inferior to the existence of a local strongman, it can be seen through the ongoing market activity even though it does not have an official license or is included in an illegal market.
Downloads
References
Afifuddin 2012, Pengantar administrasi pembangunan, Bandung: Alfabeta. Agustino, Leo dan Mohammad Agus Yusoff. (2010). Politik Lokal Di Indonesia: Dari Otokratik Ke Reformasi Politik. Dalam Jurnal Ilmu Politik Edisi 21. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. 2003. Ekonomi Moral, Rasional, dan Politik Dalam Industri Kecil di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Backbro, J., & Nystrom, H. (2006, 01 16). Entrepreneurial Marketing Innovate value creation.
Bagong, Suyanto. 2005. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Jakarata: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.
Creswell, John, 1994, Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London: SAGE Publications
Faisal, sanapiah. 2010. Format-format penelitian sosial. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo
Garna, Judistira, K. 1999. Metode Penelitian: Pendekatan Kualitatif. Bandung: Primaco Akademika.
Handoko, T. Hani 2011, Manajemen Personalia Sumberdaya Manusia, BPFE, Yogyakarta
Harriss White B India Working Essays on society and economy Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2003
Hidayat, Syarif. (2007). Shadow State? Bisnis dan Politik di Provinsi Banten dalam Henk Schulte Nordholt dan Gerry van Klinten (editor), Politik Lokal di Indonesia (terj. Bernard Hidayat). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia- KITLV.
Lexie M. Giroth, 2004, “Status dan Peran Pendidikan Pramong Praja Indonesia”, CV Indra Prahasta, Jakarta.
Listyaningsih, 2014. Administrasi Pembangunan, Graha ilmu: Yogyakarta.
Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miles, B. Mathew dan Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.
Moh.Kusnardi dan Harmaily Ibrahim, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Cetakan Ketujuh, Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum UI. Jakarta. 1988.
Munaf, Yusri. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Pekanbaru: Marpoyan Tujuh, 2016. Napitupulu, Paimin, Pelayanan Publik & Costomer Satisfaction, PT Alumni,
Bandung, 2007.
Nordhot, Schutle Henk dan Gerry van Klinken dibantu oleh Ireen Karang – Hoogenboom. Politik Lokal di Indonesia. 2007. Pengantar : Anies Baswedan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. KITLV – Jakarta.
Philip & Duncan. (2012). Marketing Principles and Methods. Georgetown: Richard D. Irwin. Inc.
Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2005.
Reno, William. Corruption and State Politics in Sierra Leone.Cambridge University Press.
Resmi Setia. (2005). Gali Tutup Lubang Itu Biasa : Strategi Buruh Menanggulangi Persoalan dari Waktu ke Waktu. Bandung: Yayasan Akatiga
Sehrawat, M.S and J.S Narang. (2001). Production Management, Nai Sarak, Dhanpahat RAI Co.
Setiadi, Elly M. dan Usman Kolip. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi. Jakarta: Kencana. Siagian, Sondang P. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suharto, Edi. 2009. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Masyarakat. (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama).
Suyanto, Bagong dan Sutinah.2011. Metode Penelitian Sosial Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Terry, George R. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
2.png)
