Analyze of Water Injection Performance Surveillance in “ATHENA” Field

Andi Apriana Dewi (1), Firdaus (2), Deny Fatryanto (3)
(1) Department of Petroleum Engineering, STT MIGAS Balikpapan, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(2) Department of Petroleum Engineering, STT MIGAS Balikpapan, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Department of Petroleum Engineering, STT MIGAS Balikpapan, Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

To measure the success of waterflood activities, we need evaluation and analysis. To support evaluation and analysis need to be done assessment of well connectivity to the response of injection wells, performance wells with Hall-plot and Voidage Replacement Ratio and calculate water breakthrough time with method Buckley-Leverett whether according to the actual field. To examine these required supporting data such as field history, production and injection history, fluid level measurement data. The results of the study showed the well ATH-43 less response (poor response) and the well ATH-37 and ATH-33 gave good response (good response) and gain oil obtained by 8,196 barrels. The hall-plot evaluation showed that the well ATH-04 had no formation/normal damage, and the results of the VRR showed the VRR < 1. The results of the calculation of water breakthrough time calculations with actual show the well experiencing breakthrough earlier than the calculation (Premature breakthrough).


 


 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Alida, R., & Juliansyah, O. (2016). ANALISA KINERJA INJEKSI AIR DENGAN METODE VOIDAGE REPLACEMENT RATIO DI PT. PERTAMINA EP ASSET 1 FIELD RAMBA. Jurnal Teknik Patra Akademika, 7(01), 41–48. https://jurnal.pap.ac.id/index.php/JTPA/article/view/29

Andalucia, S., Fachri, & Al Hafidz, A. (2016). Analisis Hall Plot Untuk Mengidentifikasi Formation Damage Dan Performance Injeksi Pada Kegiatan Waterflooding Di Lapangan North Rifa Pt. Pertamina Ep Asset 1 Field Ramba. Jurnal Teknik Patra Akademika, 7(02), 24–37. https://jurnal.pap.ac.id/index.php/JTPA/article/view/16

Hamdi, R. (2015). EVALUASI WATERFLOOD ZONA 560 DAN ZONA 660 LAPANGAN “X” MENGGUNAKAN OFM PADA TAHUN 1984-2005. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN. https://doi.org/10.25105/SEMNAS.V0I0.163

Hariyadi, H., & Aribowo, N. (2013, January 5). Evaluasi Performance Injeksi Air pada Lapangan Minyak “X” Didukung dengan Pelaksanaan Surveillance dan Perencanaan Water Injection Plant Sederhana. Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia “Kejuangan.” http://eprints.upnyk.ac.id/2599/1/Evaluasi%20Performance%20Injeksi%20Air%20pada%20Lapangan%20Minyak%20X%20Didukung%20dengan%20Pelaksanaan%20Surveillance%20dan%20Perencanaan%20Water%20Injection%20Plant%20Sederhana.pdf

Iqbal, A., Kasmungin, S., & Pratiwi, R. (2017). Evaluasi Kinerja Reservoir Dengan Injeksi Air Pada Pattern 8 Lapangan “TQL.” Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan Ke-3, 13–18.

Mursyidah, Putra, D., & Futur, L. (2020). Re-design waterflood pattern by utilizing the tracers test technique and interwell streamline simulator. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2230, 030004. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002736

Nidiarti, Said, L., & Ridaliani, O. (2018). ANALISA INJEKSI AIR DENGAN METODOLOGI BUCKLEY-LEVERETT. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan Ke-4, 543–547.

Terrado, M., Yudono, S., & Thakur, G. (2007). Waterflooding Surveillance and Monitoring: Putting Principles Into Practice. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 10(05), 552–562. https://doi.org/10.2118/102200-PA

Thomas, M. M., Nuraeni, S., & Setiati, R. (2015). KAJIAN METODE BUCKLEY LEVERETT UNTUK PREDIKSI PENINGKATAN PEROLEHAN MINYAK DI SUMUR MT-02 LAPANGAN X. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 243–251. https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/semnas/article/view/142/141

Yang, Z. (2009). A New Diagnostic Analysis Method for Waterflood Performance. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12(02), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.2118/113856-PA

Authors

Andi Apriana Dewi
Firdaus
firdaus.malik42@yahoo.com (Primary Contact)
Deny Fatryanto
Dewi, A., Firdaus, & Fatryanto, D. (2022). Analyze of Water Injection Performance Surveillance in “ATHENA” Field. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 11(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2022.6356

Article Details

Received 2021-01-31
Accepted 2022-07-06
Published 2022-09-10