Comparative Study of Economic Evaluation of PSC Cost Recovery and PSC Gross Split Scheme for Expiry Block, Case Study Field A in Sumatera

Prayang Sunny Yulia (1), Adji Nadzif Sidqi (2), Syamsul Irham (3), Mustamina Maulani (4), Puri Wijayanti (5)
(1) a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:20:"Universitas Trisakti";}, Indonesia,
(2) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia,
(3) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia,
(4) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia,
(5) , Indonesia

Abstract

In August 2021, there was an alteration in the production-sharing contract for Field A, which is located at Rokan Block, Riau Province. The methods that were applied were waterflood and artificial lift by using an Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP). This block is an expiry block, whereas a new block is due to contract expiry from the previous contractor. The contract previously used was a Production Sharing Contract (PSC) Cost Recovery, which changed to PSC Gross Split. This contract comparison aims to synergistically evaluate the comparison of the two economic models and also to determine a more efficient and appropriate scheme to be applied to field A, as well as to analyze the parameters that can affect the economic indicators. The results of the economic analysis that has been carried out show that the PSC Gross Split scheme is better than the PSC Cost Recovery scheme. The NPV of the PSC Gross Split scheme for 30 wells was $37,903,000, and the PSC Cost Recovery scheme for 30 wells was $13,850,000. From 30 wells, the result decided on the A6 Well, which the NPV of A6 Well has the best NPV for both schemes based on the contractor's point of view, $494,000 for the PSC Cost Recovery, and $ 1,380,000 for the PSC Gross Split. The Pay Out Time (POT) is derived as well from A6 Well for both schemes, which is 1.39 years for PSC Cost Recovery and 1.2 years for PSC Gross Split. The Interest Rate of Return (IRR) of PSC Cost Recovery is 146% on the A19 Well, and for PSC Gross Split is 408% on the A4 Well. The sensitivity analysis that has been carried out shows that the parameters of the amount of oil production and the price of oil have a significant effect on both schemes.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Adityawarman, A., Aziz, F. A., Aziz, P. A., Yusgiantoro, P., & Chandra, S. (2020). Economic Evaluation of Fiscal Regime on EOR Implementation in Indonesia: A Case Study of Low Salinity Water Injection on Field X. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 9(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2020.4608

Afiati, N., Irham, S., & Pramadika, H. (2020). ANALISIS KEEKONOMIAN BLOK NSRN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PSC GROSS SPLIT DAN PENAMBAHAN DISKRESI. Petro: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan, 9(2).

Anjani, B. R., & Baihaqi, I. (2018). Comparative analysis of financial Production Sharing Contract (PSC) cost recovery with PSC gross split: Case study in one of the contractor SKK Migas. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20474/jabs-4.2.2

Arifin, K., & Hidayat, D. (2021). COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS IN PRODUCTION SHARING CONTRACT IN UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY (STUDY ON GAS UPSTREAM INDUSTRIES INDONESIA). Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.38035/DIJEFA

Ariyon, M., Setiawan, A., & Reza, R. (2020). Economic Feasibility Study of Onshore Exploration Oil Field Development using Gross Split Contract. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 847(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/847/1/012030

Daniel, H. (2017, October 17). Indonesian Milestone in Production-Sharing Contract in Perspective of Government Take, Contractor Take, Cost Recovery and Production Target. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, Paper Number: SPE-187008-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187008-MS

Giranza, M. J., & Bergmann, A. (2018). Indonesia’s New Gross Split PSC: Is It More Superior Than the Previous Standard PSC? Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 6(2).

Irham, S., & Julyus, P. (2018). The new energy management policy: Indonesian PSC-gross-split applied on steam flooding project. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 106, 012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012109

Irham, S., Sibuea, S. N., & Danu, A. (2018). The New Management Policy: Indonesian PSC-Gross Split Applied on CO2 Flooding Project. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 106(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/

Kesumaputri, F. D., & Irham, S. (2016). Analisa Kelayakan Perpanjangan Kontrak Blok XO dengan Sistem Production Sharing Contract (PSC). Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan 2015, 379–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.256

Pramadika, H., & Satiyawira, B. (2019). PENGARUH HARGA GAS DAN KOMPONEN VARIABEL TERHADAP KEUNTUNGAN KONTRAKTOR PADA GROSS SPLIT. PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan, 7(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.25105/petro.v7i3.3817

Sidqi, A. N., Irham, S., & Yulia, P. S. (2022). Evaluasi Perbandingan Keekonomian 30 Sumur Skema PSC Cost Recovery dan Gross Split Lapangan A. PETRO: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan, 11(4), 191–195.

Authors

Prayang Sunny Yulia
prayang@trisakti.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Adji Nadzif Sidqi
Syamsul Irham
Mustamina Maulani
Puri Wijayanti
Yulia, P. S., Sidqi, A. N., Irham, S., Maulani, M., & Wijayanti, P. (2023). Comparative Study of Economic Evaluation of PSC Cost Recovery and PSC Gross Split Scheme for Expiry Block, Case Study Field A in Sumatera. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 12(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2023.12530

Article Details

Received 2023-05-01
Accepted 2023-09-11
Published 2023-10-31