Developing Winning Tender Recommendation System: Fuzzy Moora Approach

Afrian F; Okfalisa

doi:10.25299/itjrd.2023.11224

Authors

Afrian F Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Okfalisa Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2023.11224

Keywords:

Recommendation System, Tender, Decision Support System, Fuzzy MOORA, Sensitivity Analysis

Abstract

A Decision-Making in determining the project tender winner becomes a significant challenge in the procurement stage, thus it is very vulnerable to administrative errors, corruption, and nepotism. Therefore, a recommendation system becomes a new problem solving in order to increase the information transparency, the company’s opportunity to win, the fraud minimization, and the community complaint on the project tender. The system is developed using the analysis of Fuzzy MOORA to calculate the significant consideration of six criteria, including the administration, the qualifications, the technical experience, the proposed price, the number of projects, and the size of the project based on the winning budget. Herein, 20 companies were acted as alternatives in applying and testing the recommendation tender system. As a result, Blackbox and User Acceptance Test (UAT) of this application from ten staffs of the Working Selection Group (POKJA) at the Bureau of Procurement of Goods and Services (PBJ) of Riau Province found that the entire modules and functions of the system run well. Meanwhile, UAT scores of 87.6% states that this application can assist the POKJA’s staffs in objectively selecting the tender winner. In addition, the sensitivity test analyzes the possible increasing of the weighting criteria, viz., C3 (technical experience) and C4 (price) can improve the quality rankings of alternatives up to 79.16%. Thus, this result enhanced the efficacy of Fuzzy MOORA approach in providing a better recommendation analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. E. J. Prakoso and C. N. Setyaningati, “Law Protection for Procurement Officers: Legal Protection against the Procurement Instrument of Goods and Services,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 175, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012128.

F. Annas, D. Ediana, A. Kurniawan, R. Wandira, and S. Zakir, “Decision Support System in Detrmination of Project Tender Winner Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1779, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012006.

K. Zong, Y. Yuan, C. E. Montenegro-Marin, and S. N. Kadry, “Or-based intelligent decision support system for e-commerce,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1150–1164, 2021, doi: 10.3390/JTAER16040065.

A. Ullah, S. Hussain, A. Wasim, and M. Jahanzaib, “Development of a decision support system for the selection of wastewater treatment technologies,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 731, p. 139158, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139158.

B. Abdullahi, Y. M. Ibrahim, A. D. Ibrahim, and K. Bala, “Developing a Web-Based Tender Evaluation System Based on Fuzzy Multi-Attributes Group Decision Making for Nigerian Public Sector Tendering,” Int. J. Comput. Inf. Eng., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 349–357, 2019.

A. Arabsheybani, M. M. Paydar, and A. S. Safaei, “An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 190, pp. 577–591, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.167.

T. Limbong, J. Simarmata, S. Sriadhi, A. R. S. Tambunan, and E. K. Sinaga, “The Implementation of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis Method to Select the Lecturer Assistant Working at Computer Laboratorium,” vol. 7, pp. 352–356, 2018.

F. Gurbuz and G. Erdinc, “Selecting the Best Hotel Using the Fuzzy-Moora Method with a New Combined Weight Approach,” ISMSIT 2018 - 2nd Int. Symp. Multidiscip. Stud. Innov. Technol. Proc., pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ISMSIT.2018.8566688.

R. Kozik, “The Process of the Tender Evaluation in Public Procurement for Implementation of Design Documentation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 222, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012019.

M. C. Matto, A. M. Ame, and P. M. Nsimbila, “Tender process and value for money in Tanzania public procurement,” Int. J. Logist. Econ. Glob., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1504/ijleg.2021.116218.

M. Gallab, H. Bouloiz, Y. L. Alaoui, and M. Tkiouat, “Risk Assessment of Maintenance activities using Fuzzy Logic,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 148, no. Icds 2018, pp. 226–235, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.065.

A. H. Hamamoto, L. F. Carvalho, L. D. H. Sampaio, T. Abrão, and M. L. Proença, “Network Anomaly Detection System using Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Logic,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 92, pp. 390–402, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.013.

H. Ahmadi, M. Gholamzadeh, L. Shahmoradi, M. Nilashi, and P. Rashvand, “Diseases diagnosis using fuzzy logic methods: A systematic and meta-analysis review,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 161, pp. 145–172, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.013.

S. Sutarno, M. Mesran, S. Supriyanto, Y. Yuliana, and A. Dewi, “Implementation of Multi-Objective Optimazation on the Base of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) in Improving Support for Decision on Sales Location Determination,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1424, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1424/1/012019.

O. Okfalisa, R. Hafsari, G. Nawanir, S. Toto, and N. Yanti, “Optimizing placement of field experience program: An integration of moora and rule-based decision making,” Pertanika J. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 895–918, 2021, doi: 10.47836/pjst.29.2.11.

S. Fadli and K. Imtihan, “Implementation of MOORA Method in Evaluating Work Performance of Honorary Teachers,” SinkrOn, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 128, 2019, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v4i1.10192.

O. Okfalisa, H. Rusnedy, D. U. Iswavigra, B. Pranggono, E. H. Haerani, and S. Saktioto, “Decision Support System for Smartphone Recommendation: the Comparison of Fuzzy Ahp and Fuzzy Anp in Multi-Attribute Decision Making,” Sinergi, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 101, 2020, doi: 10.22441/sinergi.2021.1.013.

O. Okfalisa, T. Fernando, D. U. Iswavigra, and K. Rajab, “Integrated Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process ( F-AHP ) and Technique for Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution ( TOPSIS ) in Recommending Extracurricular Program Selection,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2022.

C. Sathiyaraj, M. Ramachandran, R. Kurinjimalar, and P. Anusuya, “Study on Fuzzy ELECTRE Method with Various Methodologies,” REST J. Emerg. trends Model. Manuf., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 108–115, 2021, doi: 10.46632/7/4/2.

C. N. Wang, N. A. T. Nguyen, T. T. Dang, and C. M. Lu, “A compromised decision-making approach to third-party logistics selection in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy ahp and fuzzy vikor methods,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9080886.

R. Dabbagh and S. Yousefi, “A hybrid decision-making approach based on FCM and MOORA for occupational health and safety risk analysis,” J. Safety Res., vol. 71, no. November, pp. 111–123, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.021.

A. Saltelli et al., “Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 114, no. January, pp. 29–39, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.012.

S. Moradi, H. Yousefi, Y. Noorollahi, and D. Rosso, “Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection and sensitivity analysis: Case study of Alborz Province, Iran,” Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 29, no. April 2017, p. 100478, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100478.

M. L. Pannier, P. Schalbart, and B. Peuportier, “Comprehensive assessment of sensitivity analysis methods for the identification of influential factors in building life cycle assessment,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 199, pp. 466–480, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.070.

N. Delgarm, B. Sajadi, K. Azarbad, and S. Delgarm, “Sensitivity analysis of building energy performance: A simulation-based approach using OFAT and variance-based sensitivity analysis methods,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 15, no. July 2017, pp. 181–193, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.020.

D. Liu, L. Li, A. Rostami-Hodjegan, F. Y. Bois, and M. Jamei, “Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models,” AAPS J., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x.

C. Su, J. Xian, and H. Huang, “An iterative equivalent linearization approach for stochastic sensitivity analysis of hysteretic systems under seismic excitations based on explicit time-domain method,” Comput. Struct., vol. 242, p. 106396, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106396.

Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, “Peraturan LKPP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021,” Jar. Dokumentasi dan Inf. Huk. BPK RI, vol. 1, p. 36, 2021.

Indah Kusumarukmi, Eryana; Joko Wahyu Adi, Tri; Awaludin, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Pessiki, S.; Jonkers, H.; Siswosukarto, S.; Fajar Setiawan, A.; Nur Rahma Putri, K. (2019). Public tendering process for construction projects: problem identifications, analysis, and proposed solutions. MATEC Web of Conferences, 258(), 02013–.

Naik, M. G., Kishore, R., & Mousavi Dehmourdi, S. A. (2021). Modeling A Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Prequalification Assessment of Construction Contractors Using CRITIC and EDAS Models. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(2), 79-101.