Selection of Tourist Destinations in the Thousand Islands (Kepulauan Seribu) Based on the Preference Value of the Simple Additive Weighting Method

Fata Nidaul Khasanah Khasanah

doi:10.25299/itjrd.2023.10967

Authors

Fata Nidaul Khasanah Khasanah Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2023.10967

Keywords:

Kepulauan Seribu Preference Value Simple Additive Weighting Tourism Tourist Destinations

Abstract

One of the potentials that can improve the economy of local communities is development in the tourism sector. Kepulauan Seribu is an archipelago area in the north of Jakarta, this area has tourism potential in the form of a cluster of islands. This group of islands has different characteristics to be used as a tourist attraction, including marine tourism, historical tourism and nature reserve tourism (conservation). Islands that have historical tourism potential are the reason for conducting research related to the selection of tourist destinations in the Kepulauan Seribu, such as Kelor, Onrust and Cipir island. The obstacles of the community in finding the right tourism potential are still lacking information from the aspects of attractions, accessibility and facilities. To assist tourists in choosing a place, a decision support system is needed that can be completed using the Simple Additive Weighting method. There are five assessment criteria including scenery, photo spots, transportation, toilets and places to eat/resto. Determination of weights on criteria using a statistical approach from the questionnaire results. The result of the preferred tourist recommendation preference value is the island of Kelor because there are seven highest scores obtained by the island compared to Onrust and Cipir island.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Ali, L. Maharani, and D. T. Untari, “Development of Religious Tourism in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia,” African J. Hosp. Tour. Leis., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2019.
[2] J. R. Riwukore, F. Habaora, and T. Yustini, “Kondisi Eksisting Destinasi Pariwisata Pantai Lasiana Kota Kupang Berdasarkan Atraksi, Aksesibilitas, Fasilitas, Kelembagaan, dan Ekosistem Pariwisata,” J. Kepariwisataan Indones., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47608/jki.v15i22021.103-115.
[3] A. Razak and R. Suprihardjo, “Pengembangan Kawasan Pariwisata Terpadu di Kepulauan Seribu,” Tek. Pomits, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2337–3539, 2013.
[4] F. N. Khasanah and H. Herlawati, “Culinary Places Recommendation System in Bekasi City Using the Simple Additive Weighting Method,” PIKSEL Penelit. Ilmu Komput. Sist. Embed. Log., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2021, doi: 10.33558/piksel.v9i1.2621.
[5] F. N. Khasanah, H. Herlawati, P. D. Antika, R. Sari, S. Murdowo, and E. Retnoningsih, “Rekomendasi Hasil Metode Weighted Product terhadap Pemilihan Tempat Kuliner di Sekitar Universitas Bhayangkara Bekasi,” Techno.Com, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 382–391, 2021, doi: 10.33633/tc.v20i3.4921.
[6] A. Dharmanto, N. S. Komariah, M. Handayani, R. Suminar, and D. T. Untari, “Analysis of tourism preferences in choosing online-base travel agents in Indonesia,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 3761–3763, 2019.
[7] F. N. Khasanah, “Fuzzy MADM for Major Selection at Senior High School,” 2nd Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Comput. Electr. Eng., pp. 41–45, 2015.
[8] S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and R. Wardoyo, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM),” Yogyakarta Graha Ilmu, 2006.
[9] E. Erlangga, Y. Yolandari, T. Thamrin, and A. K. Puspa, “Analisis Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pemilihan Tanaman Hias,” Explor. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 56, 2021, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v12i1.2010.
[10] D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2017.
[11] T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
[12] Dicky Nofriansyah, Konsep Data Mining VS Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.
[13] F. N. Khasanah, R. Trias Handayanto, H. Herlawati, D. Thamrin, P. Prasojo, and E. S. H. Hutahaean, “Decision Support System for Student Scholarship Recipients Using Simple Additive Weighting Method with Sensitivity Analysis,” in 2020 5th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288617.
[14] Y. Lestari, Sunardi, and A. Fadlil, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru dan Pemilihan Jurusan dengan Metode AHP dan SAW,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1607–1620, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4227.
[15] F. Andini, G. Z. Mulki, and A. Septianti, “Analisis Kelayakan Potensi Objek Wisata Danau Laet di Kabupaten Sanggau Studi Kasus Desa Subah,” J. Elektron. Laut, Sipil, Tambang, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jelast.v9i1.53763.
[16] N. Chinoi, A. Meiriza, S. Informasi, F. I. Komputer, and U. Sriwijaya, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Wisata Belanja di Kota Batam Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ),” vol. 6, no. 1, 2022.