A Study on Students’ Digital Literacy in Reading Comprehension at SMAN 5 Pekanbaru
Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
The objectives of this research were to find out how are students’ digital literacy at SMAN 5 Pekanbaru. This research focuses on how are students’ digital literacy of second-grade class MIPA 2 SMAN 5 Pekanbaru. The research design of this study was a case study. There is one class that was being sampled that was consisted of 35 students which were 35 students of class MIPA 2. The instrument of this research was an open questionnaire of digital literacy indicators. In this research digital literacy consisted of four factors containing 12 indicators. The first factor and its related operation skills consisted of cognition, invention, and presentation. The second factor was thinking skills consisting of analysis, evaluation, and creativity. The third factor was collaboration skills consisting of teamwork, networking, and sharing. The fourth factor was awareness skills consisting of ethics, legal literacy, and safeguarding self. students' digital literacy can be seen by indicators of digital literacy by finding out from students' answers on the questionnaire. The researcher analyzed the data that find out that were 33 students of 35 students that answer the question in cognition, 29 of students answer the question in the invention, 32 students answer the question in presentation, 33 students answer the question in analysis, 33 students answer the question in evaluation, 34 students answer the question in creativity, 35 students answer the question in teamwork, 35 students answer the question in networking, 35 students answer the question in sharing, 32 students answer the question in ethics, 33 students answer the question in legal literacy, 33 students answer the question in safeguarding self. Most of the students who answer that questions seem like they understand and have their opinion about learning in digital literacy. These results were employed to develop digital literacy students at SMAN 5 Pekanbaru.
Downloads
References
Ahmadpour, Kamran.2014.Developing a framework for understanding information literacy in the 21st Century. Master of education. University of Ontario Institute of Technology.
Barnett, J. E and Francis, A.L. 2012. Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: a classroom study. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology.
Bawden, D. (2008) Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. In: Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (eds). Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, Peter Lang, New York.
Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills - practical approaches. Phi Delta Kappan, 65(7), 486-490.
Bilder, Mary Sarah. 1999. The Lost Lawyers: Early American Legal Literates and Transatlantic Legal Culture. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 11: 47-112. (LawSource* locator citation: 11 YJLH 47)
Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043-1045.
Brown, D. L. (1996). Kids, computers and constructivism. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 23 (3), 189-196.
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared work spaces. Paper presented at the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’92), Toronto, Canada.
Eckroth-Bucher, M. 2010. Self awareness: A review and analysis of a basic nursing concept. Advances in Nursing Science, 33 (4), 297–309.
Elster, J. (1983). Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eshet-Alakali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 7, 421e429.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Girard, M. P., & Trapp, P. (2011). “An exploratory study of class presentations and peer evaluations: Do students perceive benefits?”
Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), 323-360.
Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 1–7.
Hamilton, A. L., & Penman, M. (2013). Using digital technology for knowledge transfer. In K. Stagnitti, A. Schoo, & D. Welsh (Eds.), Clinical and Fieldwork Placement for Health Professionals, (2nd ed.) South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Harris, P. R., & Harris, K. G. (1996). Managing effectively through teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 2(3), 23-36.
Jenkins, R. (2015). Integrating digital literacy into English language instruction: Companion Learning Resource. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Social Interdependence - Cooperative Learning in Education. In B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (pp. 205-251). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Karadag, Z. (2009). Analyzing Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Technology-Supported Environments. University Toronto: Unpublished Dissertation.
Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A. B., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35, 745-768.
Leon, L. A., & Tai, L. S. (2004). Implementing cooperative learning in a team teaching environment. Journal of Education for Business, 79(5), 287293.
Limbach, B & Waugh, W. 2010. Developing Higher Level Thinking. Journal of Instructonal Pedagogies. p: 1-9
Manley-Casimir, Michael E., Wanda M. Cassidy, and Suzanne de Castell. 1986. Legal Literacy: Towards a Working Definition. Report Submitted to the Canadian Law Information Council. Ottawa: Canadian Law Information Council
.png)
