Classroom Application of Micro Teaching : An Analysis of Students’ Perspectives

  • Sri Yuliani Universitas Islam Riau


Microteaching is a practical event which is very beneficial for candidate teachers to have real environment of teaching. The candidate teachers get big chances to implement their experience in teaching. The students’ perfectives are crucial for promoting teacher education programs’ outcomes. This study aimed at investigating the students’ views of thirty students from the English Language Education Program of FKIP-UIR. A combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques used in gathering the data. Mainly, a questionnaire and a focus group interview were used as the main tools for data collection. The findings revealed that the entire sample of student has stated that they were having their own perspectives towards Microteaching and their opinion during microteaching sessions provides a scope to enhance their teaching skills for real teaching sessions. Based on the findings, these candidate teachers were glad to have real teaching session during microteaching class


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1984. Evaluation Basics Yogyakarta Education: Literacy Development.

Bell, Nancy D. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal , v18 n1 p24-40 Spr 2007

Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The Microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4), 830-835.

Britton, L. R., and Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilized concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314.

Butler, A. (2001). Pre-service music teachers‟ conceptions of teaching effectiveness, Microteaching experiences and teaching performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 258–272.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cruickshank, D. R., et al. (1996). Preparing America‟s Teachers. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

Cruickshank, K. (1996). Critical thinking, New Jersey: Simon & Schuster

Fernandez, M.L. & Robinson, M.(2007). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions on Microteaching Lesson Study: 127 (2) 203-215

Fernandez, M.L.(2010). Investigating How and What Prospective Teachers Learn Through Microteaching Lesson Study. Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (2) 351-362

Fisher, B. Aubrey. 1978. Perspectives on Human Communication. New York.

Funmi A. Amobi. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter 2005. Preservice Teachers' Reflectivity on the Sequence and Consequences of Teaching Actions. Retrieved from January 2017.

Fry, J. M., and Hin, M. K. T. (2006). Peer coaching with interactive wireless technology between student teachers: Satisfaction with role and communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 193–204.

Grossman, P., and McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education.American Educational Research Journal, 45,184–205.

Higgins, A., and Nicholl, H. (2003). The experiences of lecturers and students in the use of Microteaching as a teaching strategy. Nurse Education in Practice, 3( 4), 220-227.

Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers‟ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and teacher Education, 26(8), 1530-1543.

Johnson, K.E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 235-257.

Jalaludin Rakhmat, 2005, Psikologi Komunikasi, edisi revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Joreskog, K. & Sorbom, D. 1996. lisrel 8: User reference guide. Chicago. Scientific Software International.
Karckay, A. T., and Sanli, S. (2009). The effect of Microteaching application on the pre-service teachers‟ teacher competency levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 844–847.

Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1998. Evaluating training programs, the four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc
Kizlik, Bob. 2009. Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Education. Online: http: // accessed on 20-01-2017.

Kubukcu, F. (2010). Congruence and dissonance between micro-teaching and macro- teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2(2), 326–329.

Leavitt (2009), Issues and problems in teacher education: An international handbook. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Lu, H. L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in pre-service teacher education: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 748–753

McNamara, O., Roberts, L., Basit, T., and Brown, T. (2002). Rites of passage in initial teacher training: Ritual performance, ordeal and numeracy skills test. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 863–878.

Mulyana (2008). Teori Komunikasi Perspektif, Jakarta: Renika Cipta.
Mulyasa, E, 2004, the Competency-Based Curriculum, Bandung: Rosdakarya

Nurhadi, 2004. Curriculum 2004. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia
Ogeyik, M. C. (2009). Attitudes of the student teachers in English language teaching programs towards Microteaching technique. English Language teaching, 2(3), 205-212.

Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing a reflective approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 22-30.

Seferoglu, G. (2006). Teacher candidates‟ reflections on some components of a pre-service English teacher education program in Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(4), 369–378.

Subramaniam, K. (2006). Creating a Microteaching evaluation form: The needed evaluation criteria. Education, 126(4), 666-677.

Uzer Usman (2006). Menjadi Guru Profesional, Bandung: Remaja RosdaKarya.

Wilkinson, G. (1996). Enhancing Microteaching through additional feedback from preservice administrators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-221.

Yaman, S. (2010). Conceptual change of pre-service teachers: A longitudinal action research study in ELT. Procedia Social
How to Cite
YULIANI, Sri. Classroom Application of Micro Teaching : An Analysis of Students’ Perspectives. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 81-97, feb. 2018. ISSN 2541-1446. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 16 july 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.