The Optimization and Analysis of Hydrocarbon Recovery under Injection of Biopolymer, Synthetic Polymer and Gels in a Heterogeneous Reservoir

Dike Fitriansyah Putra (1), Cenk Temizel (2)
(1) Rafflesia Energy Inc, Indonesia,
(2) Aera Energy LLC, United States

Abstract

Water injection is a conventional method which increases the recovery by providing pressure support and displacing oil in the heterogeneous porous medium. Mobility ratio is important for a more efficient oil displacement by the injected fluid. Mobility ratio can be reduced using the fluids involving gelling agents. While polymers degrade and break up on experiencing sudden shear stresses and high temperatures, polymer macromolecules are forced to flow into narrow channels and pores where molecular scission processes can take place. It is importance to have a strong understanding of the use of the right type and amount of viscosity as a reduction agent. For polymer injection, a comparison of xanthan polymer and synthetic polymer mechanisms was conducted. A commercial full-physics reservoir simulator was coupled with a robust optimization and uncertainty tool to run the model, where a simplified gel kinetics was assumed to form a microgel with no redox catalyst. Control and uncertainty variables were set to investigate the sensitivity of this process using the coupled optimization and uncertainty tool. Results demonstrate deep penetration of gel and blocking of the high permeability bottom layers. Sensitivity studies indicate the relative merits of biopolymer, xanthan polymer in terms of viscosity effects vs synthetic PAM in terms of resistance factor vs in-situ gelation treatments and their crossflow dependence. Adsorption and retention of polymer and gel are permeability dependent. Considering the potential for application of gel solutions in the U.S. and throughout the world, this study illustrates the relative advantages of different treatments in terms of viscosity reduction in the same model in a comparative way, while outlining the significance of each control and uncertainty variable for better management of reservoirs where displacement efficiency is highly critical.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abidina A. Z., Puspasaria T., Nugroho W. W., (2012), Polymers for Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology, Procedia Chemistry, 4:11-16, Indonesia

Chen Q., Wang Y., Lu Z., Feng Y., (2013), Thermoviscosifying Polymer Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Rheological Behaviors and Core Flooding Test, Polym. Bull., , 70:391-401

Sorbie K.S. (1991), Polymer-Improved Oil Recovery, Springer Science+Business Medai, LLC, New York

Sheng J. J., Leonhardt B., Azri N., Status of Polymer Flooding Technology, March 2015, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology

Wever, D.A.Z., Picchioni, F., Broekhuis A.A. (2011), Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: A paradigm for structure-property relationship in aqueous solution, Progress in Polymer Science 36, 1558–1628

Taylor K. C., Nasr-El-Din H. (1998), Water-soluble Hydropobically Associating Polymers for Improved Oil Recovery: A Literature Review, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 19, Issues 3-4, (March), Pages 265-280

Sheng J. (2011), Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery-Theory and Practice

Cook, B. C. (2003), Characterization of Comb Polymer Kypam for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Dissertation.

Vroman I., Tighzert L. (2009), Biodegradable Polymers, Materials, 2, 307-344, France

Al-Sulaimani H., Joshi S., Al-Wahaibi Y., Al-Bahry S., Elshafie A., Al-Bemani A. (2011), Microbial Biotechnology for Enhancing Oil Recovery, Society of Applied Biotechnology, India

Sen R. (2008), Biotechnology in Petroleum Recovery: The Microbial EOR, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34: 714-724

Survase A. A., Saudagar P. S., Bajaj I. B., Singhal R. S. (2007), Scleroglucan: Fermentative Production, Downstream Processing and Application, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 45 (2) 107–118

Sang Q., Li Y., Li Z., Dong M. (2014), Enhanced Oil Recovery by Branched-Preformed Particle Gel Injection in Parallel-Sandpack Models, Fuel 136 295–306

Wang D. (2013), Polymer Flooding Practice in Daqing, Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Studies, Book Chapter 4

Liang J., Seright R. S. (1997), Further Investigations of Why Gels Reduce Water Permeability More Than Oil Permeability, SPE Production and Facilities, (November)

Tongwa P., Bai B. (2014), Degradable Nanocomposite Preformed Particle Gel for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 124 35–45

Liao J. (2014), Gel treatment field application survey for water shut off in production wells, Missouri University of Science and Technology, MS Dissertation, Fall

T. Ahmed. (2001), Reservoir Engineering Handbook, Gulf Professional Publishing, Texas, pp.256-278

J. Kleppe. (2007), TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Technique, Handout notes 6 Dykstra-Parson’s Method, NTNU, Trondheim, pp.1-5

A. Satter, G.Iqbal & J. Buchwalter. (2008), Practical Enhanced Reservoir Engineering, PennWell Corporation, Oklahoma, pp.62-72

Zhang, M., Yilmaz, T., Boztas, A.O., Karakuzu, O., Bang, W.Y., Yegin, Y., Luo, Z., Lenox, M., Cisneros-Zevallos, L. and Akbulut, M. (2016). A multifunctional nanoparticulate theranostic system with simultaneous chemotherapeutic, photothermal therapeutic, and MRI contrast capabilities. RSC Advances, 6(33), pp.27798-27806.

Zhang, M., Soto-RodrĂ­guez, J., Chen, I.C. and Akbulut, M., 2013. Adsorption and removal dynamics of polymeric micellar nanocarriers loaded with a therapeutic agent on silica surfaces. Soft Matter, 9(42), pp.10155-10164.

Zhang, M. and Akbulut, M., 2011. Adsorption, desorption, and removal of polymeric nanomedicine on and from cellulose surfaces: effect of size. Langmuir, 27(20), pp.12550-12559.

Cziple F. A., Marques A. J. V., Biopolymers versus Synthetic Polymers, Anul 15, NR. 1, 2008, ISSN 1453 – 7397

Zhang, M., Yang, F., Pasupuleti, S., Oh, J.K., Kohli, N., Lee, I.S., Perez, K., Verkhoturov, S.V., Schweikert, E.A., Jayaraman, A. and Cisneros-Zevallos, L., 2014. Preventing adhesion of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 on tomato surfaces via ultrathin polyethylene glycol film. International journal of food microbiology, 185, pp.73-81.

Yegin, Y., Perez-Lewis, K.L., Zhang, M., Akbulut, M. and Taylor, T.M., 2016. Development and characterization of geraniol-loaded polymeric nanoparticles with antimicrobial activity against foodborne bacterial pathogens. Journal of Food Engineering, 170, pp.64-71.

Orts W. J., Roa-Espinosa A., Sojka R. E., Glenn G. M., Imam S. H., Erlacher K., Pedersen J. S. (2007). Use of Synthetic Polymers and Biopolymers for Soil Stabilization in Agricultural, Construction, and Military Applications, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(1), 58-66

Wever D. A. Z., Picchioni F., Broekhuis A. A. (2011). Polymers for Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Paradigm for Structure-Property Relationship in Aqueous Solution, Progress in Polymer Science, 36, 1558-1628

Hamed S. B., Belhadri M. (2009). Rheological Properties of Biopolymers Drilling Fluids, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 67: 84-90

Woodrow J. E., Seiber J. N. and Miller G. C. (2008). Acrylamide Release Resulting from Sunlight Irradiation of Aqueous Polyacrylamide/Iron Mixtures. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 56 (8): 2773–2779.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1994). Documentation for Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentrations (IDLHs) – Acrylamide.

Sisnaiske, J., Hausherr, V., Krug, A. K., Zimmer, B., Hengstler, J. G., Leist, M., & van Thriel, C. (2014), Acrylamide alters neurotransmitter induced calcium responses in murine ESC-derived and primary neurons, Neurotoxicology, 43, 117-126.

Kalia, S. and Avérous, L. (2011), Biopolymers: biomedical and environmental applications (Vol. 70). John Wiley & Sons.

Elancheziyan S. SD., Sivasurian N., Meenakshi S. (2014), Recovery of oil from oil-in-water emulsion using biopolymers by adsorptive method, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, India, 70 399-407

Mellati, A., Dai, S., Bi, J., Jin, B. and Zhang, H. (2014), A biodegradable thermosensitive hydrogel with tuneable properties for mimicking three-dimensional microenvironments of stem cells. RSC Adv. 4 (109): 63951–63961

Yetisen, A. K., Naydenova, I., Da Cruz Vasconcellos, F., Blyth, J. and Lowe, C. R. (2014), Holographic Sensors: Three-Dimensional Analyte-Sensitive Nanostructures and their Applications. Chemical Reviews. 114 (20): 10654–96.

Hu, X. and Gong, X. (2016), A new route to fabricate biocompatible hydrogels with controlled drug delivery behavior. Journal of colloid and interface science, 470, pp.62-70.

L.R.Zeron (2012), “Introduction to Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Processes and
Bioremediation of Oil-Contaminated Sites”, InTech Europe, pp.1-36

Authors

Dike Fitriansyah Putra
dputra@rafflesiaenergy.com (Primary Contact)
Cenk Temizel
Putra, D. F., & Temizel, C. (2018). The Optimization and Analysis of Hydrocarbon Recovery under Injection of Biopolymer, Synthetic Polymer and Gels in a Heterogeneous Reservoir. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 7(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2018.vol7(1).1301

Article Details

Received 2018-03-13
Accepted 2018-05-10
Published 2018-04-17