Analisis Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Pekerjaan Pembesian Dan Bekisting Serta Faktor -Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya
Analysis of Labor Productivity of Rebar and Formwork Activity, and Its Affecting Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/saintis.2022.vol22(02).25190Keywords:
produktivitas, produktivitas rating, Labor Utilization Rate (LUR), faktor-faktor produktivitasAbstract
[ID] Proyek konstruksi pada pekerjaan pembesian kolom dan plat lantai merupakan elemen penting untuk menjaga kekuatan dan stabilitas bangunan. Sumber daya, khususnya tenaga kerja, material, mesin, uang, dan metode, sangat menentukan keberhasilan proyek. Studi ini betujuan menghitung nilai produktivitas pekerja dan menganalisa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja tersebut. Metode yang digunakan untuk mendapatkan nilai produktivitas yaitu dengan menggunakan pendekatan productivity rating dan Labor Utilization Rate (LUR). Untuk mendapatkan factor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja dilakukan dengan penyebaran kuisioner kepada responden (tenaga kerja proyek) dan analisis data dilakukan dengan bantuan alat statistic SPSS versi 25. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produktivitas rata-rata pada pembesian kolom, pembesian plat lantai, dan bekisting masing-masing 77,89%, 75,61%, dan 70,86%, menandakan pekerjaan produktif karena nilai di atas 50%. Analisis statistik menunjukkan sembilan variabel tidak berpengaruh signifikan secara simultan terhadap produktivitas pekerja (sig 0,828 > 0,05), dan secara parsial variabel tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan (sig < 0,05). Faktor yang paling dominan mempengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja adalah kesehatan pekerja dengan nilai t = 1,569 dan sig 0,148. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya aspek kesehatan dalam mendukung produktivitas tenaga kerja dan kesuksesan proyek konstruksi.
[EN] Construction projects of rebars' columns and floor are important elements to maintain the strength and stability of the building. Resources, especially labour, materials, machinery, money, and methods, greatly determine the success of a project. This study aims to calculate the value of worker productivity and analyse the factors that affect the productivity of the workforce. The method used to obtain productivity values is by using the productivity rating and Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) approaches. To obtain factors that affect labor productivity, a questionnaire was distributed to respondents (project labor) and data analysis was carried out with the help of SPSS version 25 statistical tool. The results showed that the average productivity of column and floor rebar, as well as formwork, was 77.89%, 75.61%, and 70.86% respectively. It indicates productive work because the value was above 50%. Statistical analysis showed that nine variables had no simultaneous significant effect on worker productivity (sig 0.828 > 0.05), and partially had no significant effect (sig < 0.05). The most dominant factor affecting labor productivity was worker health with a value of t = 1.569 and sig 0.148. These findings confirm the importance of health aspects in supporting workforce productivity and the success of construction projects.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Sinungan, Produktivitas Apa dan Bagaimana, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2018.
[2] C. Indonesia, “Pemerintah Targetkan Peningkatan Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja.” [Online]. Available: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20181221104236-92355449/ Pemerintah-targetkan-peningkatan-produktivitas-tenaga-kerja.
[3] H. Kerzner, Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, 9th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[4] S. Anogara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2000.
[5] T. Aprilian, “Analisis Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Rangka Atap Baja.,” Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2010.
[6] Oglesby, Clarkson H., Parker, Henry W., and G. A. Howell, Productivity improvement in construction. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989.
[7] Pramuji, “Pengukuran produktivitas pekerja sebagai dasar perhitungan upah kerja pada anggaran biaya,” Universitas Sumatra Utara., 2008.
[8] Ervianto and Wulfram I, Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Yogyakarta., 2005.
[9] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
[10] Sugiyono, Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
[11] H. Umar, “Metodologi Penelitian,” Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2002.
[12] Iskandar, Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, 2009.
[13] E. K. Edulan, “Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja tukang batu,” Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang, 2016.
[14] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
[15] M. Singarimbun, Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia, 1987.
[16] S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Meutia Pocut Faradina , Sapitri, Elizar, Sri Hartati Dewi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright. This is an open access article which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Jurnal Saintis allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restriction. The copyright in the text of individual articles (including research articles, opinion articles, and abstracts) is the property of their respective authors distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.



