A Needs Analysis of Field-Specific Listening Material Preferences among Vocational EFL Students

https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2026.vol13(2).29933

Authors

Keywords:

ESP needs analysis; multimodal listening; vocational English; field-specific materials; listening challenges

Abstract

Multimodal listening resources are often recommended for vocational English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classrooms, but studies of learner preference typically treat vocational learners as a single group, even though ESP theory holds that instruction should match the specific needs of each learner group rather than a generic one. This study compared three vocational tracks, hospitality, tourism, and content creation, on their general preference for multimodal input and on the specific listening content and challenges they report. Data came from a bilingual questionnaire comprising 10 Likert-scale items and 4 open-ended items, completed by 76 Critical Listening students in a D3 English Study Program in East Java, Indonesia. Track membership was inferred from students' open-ended responses, yielding a single-track subsample of 47 for group comparison (hospitality n=12, tourism n=16, content creation n=19). Kruskal-Wallis tests found no statistically significant differences between tracks on any preference item, indicating that a general preference for multimodal input was not detectably different across tracks in this sample. Content analysis of the open-ended responses, however, showed clearly different content preferences and reported challenges: hospitality students favored staff-guest service scripts, tourism students favored tour-guiding and travel-narration material, and content-creation students favored vlogs, interviews, and social media content, with content-creation respondents also reporting more connectivity and distraction-related difficulties. Together, these findings suggest a practical distinction for ESP course design: the format of listening instruction can remain multimodal across a shared course, while the content it carries may still need to be differentiated by occupational track.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.

Dwi Prastyo, Y., Dianingsih, A., & Farhana, S. (2023). Students' perception of using podcasts to improve listening skills at the 3rd semester students of English Department at Universitas Bandar Lampung. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 10(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2023.vol10(2).11177

Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3

Hadijah, S., & Shalawati, S. (2018). Enhancing English language learners' listening comprehension through instruction in listening strategies. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2018.vol5(1).1204

Herdiansyah, Y. K., & Hardiyanto, A. (2026). Writing with precision: How Filipino ESL learners navigate technical terms and context clues. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 13(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2026.vol13(1).26656

Hsieh, Y. (2020). Effects of video captioning on EFL vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1577898

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: What is it and where is it taking us? ESP Today, 10(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.1

Ilyas, M., & Putri, M. E. (2020). YouTube channel: An alternative social media to enhance EFL students' speaking skill. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 7(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2020.vol7(1).4141

Kaharuddin, Hikmawati, & Arafah, B. (2019). Needs analysis on English for vocational purpose for students of hospitality department. KnE Social Sciences, 3(19), 344–387. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4869

Lertchalermtipakoon, P., Wongsubun, U., & Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2021). Need analysis: English language use by students in the tourism and hospitality industry. English Language Teaching, 14(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n3p59

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Nastiti, I. A., Noviabahari, J. L., & Prakosha, D. (2026). Initial need analysis of applied English for students of English study program in the hospitality field. PAEDAGOGIA, 29(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v29i1.114774

Negara, M. H. J., & Jamilah. (2025). Improving English listening skills for vocational students through interactive ICT tools. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 5360–5377. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8133

Nurhasanah, T., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). ESP need analysis of computer and network engineering in vocational high school. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 10(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2023.vol10(2).13347

Prabowo, B. A., & Saptiany, S. G. (2024). Communication challenges in the hospitality business: Analysis of students' strategies in learning English at STIEPARI Semarang. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 20(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v20i1.10216

Prima, S. (2022). A study of perception of the importance of English language skills among Indonesian hotel employees. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 9(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2022.vol9(1).8972

Rizqiani, D. A., & Novitri, S. (2023). Developing needs analysis of critical literacy models for teaching EFL reading class. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 10(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2023.vol10(2).12831

Santika, S., Wirza, Y., & Emilia, E. (2022). A needs analysis for ESP in a multimedia study programme of a vocational high school. International Journal of Education, 15(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v15i1.46156

Saripi, S., Asari, & S. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing speaking skills in non-formal education. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.11166

Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 50–73.

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338

Verbeke, G., & Simon, E. (2023). Listening to accents: Comprehensibility, accentedness and intelligibility of native and non-native English speech. Lingua, 292, 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103572

Wagner, E. (2010). The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance. Language Testing, 27(4), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209355668

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Isa, M. (2026). A Needs Analysis of Field-Specific Listening Material Preferences among Vocational EFL Students. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 13(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2026.vol13(2).29933