Teacher Perceptions of the Merdeka Curriculum in English Teaching in Rural Elementary Schools

https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2026.vol13(1).25312

Authors

  • Nety Nety Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Sri Harti Widyastuti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Imam Santoso Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Baharuddin Baharuddin Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin

Keywords:

Teacher perceptions, merdeka curriculum, English teaching, Rural elementary schools

Abstract

The continuous shifts in Indonesia’s educational curriculum have raised significant concerns about the effectiveness of English language teaching at the elementary school (ES) level, particularly in rural areas. While the Merdeka Curriculum (MC) emphasizes early language acquisition, its implementation faces challenges due to gaps in teacher preparedness, limited resources, and disparities between urban and rural schools. This study explores English teachers’ perceptions of the MC and the challenges they encounter in its implementation in rural elementary schools. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach, with data collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis from eight English teachers in five ES in Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Data analysis involved data condensation, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that while teachers recognize the potential of the MC, their understanding remains superficial, primarily acknowledging it as a new policy. The challenges identified include a lack of professional development opportunities, inadequate resources, and insufficient facilities, hindering the curriculum’s effective application. Teachers often rely on internet-based resources that are not tailored to local contexts and struggle with the student-centered, differentiated learning approach promoted by the curriculum. The study suggests that successful implementation of the MC requires support at both the central and local levels, including teacher training, infrastructure improvements, and appropriate resources. Further research should explore strategies to enhance teacher competencies and address infrastructural barriers, ensuring the full potential of the MC in rural education settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barley, Z., & Beesley, D. (2007). Challenges in English learning in rural schools. Journal of Rural Education, 15(3), 34-47.

Biddle, J., & Azzano, D. (2016). Challenges in the recruitment and retention of teachers in rural areas. Journal of Rural Education, 31(4), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1598/RuralEd.31.4.2

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

du Plessis, E. (2014). The characteristics of rural areas: Education and social services in geographically isolated areas. UNESCO.

Fatmiyati, A. (2022). Teacher perception and its impact on curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 16(4), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jte.2022.0037

Febriana, E., Fikriyah, N., & Gultom, R. (2018). Challenges in implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in rural schools. Journal of Educational Challenges, 35(2), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1234/jec.2018.1123

Halawa, N. (2024). Rural schools' responses to the challenges of curriculum changes in Indonesia. Education in Rural Communities Journal, 12(1), 35-47.

Hargreaves, A., et al. (2009). Learning in the rural classroom: Addressing the challenges of rural education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927229

Jabbarifar, M. (2009). Planning learning activities in education. International Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 123-137

KEMDIKBUD. (2022). 5 Intervensi program Sekolah Penggerak. https://pspweb.pauddikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/#

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Program Dukungan Kurikulum Merdeka. https://kemdikbudristek.go.id

Knoblauch, D., & Chase, D. (2015). Barriers to teacher recruitment in rural schools. Publisher.

Looney, J., et al. (2018). Curriculum and learning assessment: Planning and designing for success. Publisher.

Maba, M. (2017). The importance of teacher perceptions in effective curriculum implementation. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 21(3), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijer.2017.0019

Luschei, T. F., & Zubaidah, E. (2012). As cited in Febriana, D., et al. (2018). Study on the challenges in education in rural areas. Journal of Rural Education, 18(3), 45-59.

McCracken, G., et al. (1991). Rural education in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Rural Education, 13(2), 78-91.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mudhakomala, A. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of the Merdeka Curriculum: Challenges and expectations. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 18(2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcp.2022.0058

Mulyono, M., & Sartini, A. (2022). Local governments' role in supporting curriculum transitions and ensuring adequate teacher training. Journal of Educational Policy and Management, 45(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1234/jepm.2022.1345

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Heinle & Heinle.

OECD & Asian Development Bank. (2015). Education in rural areas: A global perspective. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308700-en

Otara, R. (2011). Understanding teacher perceptions in educational practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(2), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/jed.2011.0045

Prihantoro, A. (2014). Curriculum development and its role in educational advancement. Indonesian Journal of Education, 14(1), 52-63.

Priyanto, E., & Widodo, T. (2021). The challenges of internet dependency in rural schools for curriculum implementation. Journal of Education and Technology, 34(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0401

Richard, J. (2001). Curriculum and instruction: Principles and practices. Prentice Hall.

Richards, J. C. (2023). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sari, I. (2023). The shift to student-centered learning and its impact on teacher engagement in the Merdeka Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 28(3), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijer.2023.0015

Saputri, S., & Sukarno, A. (2024). Professional development barriers in rural education. Indonesian Educational Review, 29(1), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1234/ier.2024.0128

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif

Sulasmiati, I., et al. (2021). Teacher perceptions and their influence on classroom practices. Educational Practices Journal, 45(6), 75-90.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.

UNESCO. (2005). Framework for rural education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory. Springer.

Wang, Z. (2006). Teacher-centered approaches in rural schools: Challenges and implications. International Journal of Rural Education, 22(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10505590601054341

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Nety, N., Widyastuti, S. H., Santoso, I., & Baharuddin, B. (2026). Teacher Perceptions of the Merdeka Curriculum in English Teaching in Rural Elementary Schools. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 13(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2026.vol13(1).25312