The Correlation Between Students’ Writing and Students’ Speaking Abilities of 9th Grades Students in Recount Text at SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Pekanbaru

https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2024.vol11(2).18716

Authors

  • Nur Asyasa Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau
  • Siti Niah Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau
  • Wandi Syahfutra Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Keywords:

Correlation; Students’ writing abilities; Student’s speaking Abilities; Recount text

Abstract

The correlation between the writing and speaking abilities of students at SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Pekanbaru in recount text was the primary focus of this research. The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of the relationship between students' writing and speaking abilities in English recount texts. This study used quantitative methods. The subjects in this study are the SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Pekanbaru class IX students for the academic year 2023. The whole class IX of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Pekanbaru becomes the sample for this study, which adopts total sampling technique. used two tests: a speaking and writing test on recount text. The findings indicated that students' writing got low score of 50 and a high score of 95. In contrast, the maximum score for students' recount text speaking ability was 90, while the lowest score was 50. Moreover, correlation coefficient found that students' writing and students' speaking abilities in recount text have a positive correlation, and the correlation between those variables were high. The study recommended that students should do more practice in writing to make them more understandable and able to construct a good sentence. Besides that, the students should practice speaking every time to improve their speaking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Celce, Marianne and Elite Olshtain. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Book Reviews Research Methods in Education. The Austr Alian Educational Researcher, 2, 147–156.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Book Reviews Research Methods in Education. The Austr Alian Educational Researcher, 2, 147–156.

Derewianka, Beverly. (1999). Exploring How Texts Work. Australia: Primary English Teaching Assossiation,

Faizah, S. K. (2020). The Effectiveness of Talking Chips To Teach Speaking Viewed From Students’ Self-Esteem. Taqorrub: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling dan Dakwah, 1(2), 21-35.

Gerot, Linda and Peter Wignell. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar.

Gilbert, J.B. (2008). Teaching pronunciation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Greenbaum, S. & Nelson, G. 2002. An Introduction to English Grammar. Second Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited

Hornby, A. S. (1995). 2 Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 1-22.

Kaharuddin, K., & Rahmadana, A. (2020). Problem-Based Group Discussion: an Effective Elt Technique To Improve Vocational High School Students’ Transactional Speaking Skills. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v8i2.11032

Kline, J.A. (2001). Speaking effectively: A guide for air force speakers.

Leong, L., Inglés, S. A.-D. de investigación en educación en. (2017). Un análisis de los factores que influyen en la capacidad de hablar inglés de los estudiantes. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34– 41.

Mailis, M., Delfi, S., & Erni, E. (2018). The correlation between reading comprehension and writing ability of the second year students of Sman 1 Muaro Sentajo Teluk Kuantan in recount texts (Doctoral dissertation, Riau University).

Mistar, J., Zuhairi, A., & Umamah, A. (2014). Strategies of learning speaking skill by senior high school EFL learners in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 80, 65-74.

Nugroho, L., Sudirman, S., & Hasan, H. (2015). The use of picture series in improving students' speaking recount text skill (Doctoral dissertation, Lampung University).

Nurcahyani, I. T. (2018). The Effectiveness Of Using Video Blog On Students’speaking Skill of Recount Text at Eight Grade of Junior High School.

Primarora, A. (2015). The Components of Speaking Skill. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Wordpress

Sugiono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Universitas Ciputra, 20–32.

Purpura, James E. (2004). Assesing Grammar. United Kingdom: Cambridge

Rahmiaty SN, R. S. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Speaking Skill Through Picture Word Inductive Model (Pwim) Media at The Eight Grade of SMP Al-Birru Parepare (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Parepare).

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching.

Safitri, N. ., & Khoiriyah, I. (2017). Students’ Perceptions on the Use of English Vlog (Video Blog) to Enhance Speaking Skill 1 Nailis Sa’adah Safitri, 2 Ianatul Khoiriyah. The 5th AASIC, 240–247.

Saputra, R. P., Hartati, H., & Kurniawan, A. E. (2021). Students’speaking Ability In Recount Text At Second Semester of English Education Program Stkip Ypm Bangko Academic Year 2019/2020. Selecting, 3(3), 48-57.

Senjawati, D. (2016). Transitivity Analysis of Tenth Grade Students’recount Texts.

Simamora, J. M., Sinaga, R., & Tarigan, S. N. (2019). Improving Students Speaking Skills by Recount Text. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 3(1), 219-229.

Trisna, Afrizona Niken. (201). A comparative Study of Identifying Features of Recount Text Achievement between the Female and Male of Second Year Students of SMP N 13 Pekanbaru. Pekanbaru: Teachers’ Training and Education Faculty of English Study Program, Language and Arts Department, University of Riau.

Widyaningsih, R. (2008). A Descriptive Study On The Techniques Used In Teaching Speaking To The First Year Students At SMA Negeri 2 Wonogiri In 2007/2008 Academic Year (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Asyasa, N., Niah, S., & Syahfutra, W. (2024). The Correlation Between Students’ Writing and Students’ Speaking Abilities of 9th Grades Students in Recount Text at SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Pekanbaru. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 11(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2024.vol11(2).18716