Students’ Difficulties with Vocabulary Mastery in English Language Education at the University Level
Keywords:
Vocabulary Mastery, Vocabulary test, English Language.Abstract
Vocabulary mastery is crucial for facilitating the acquisition of language skills. This research aims to identify students' difficulties with vocabulary mastery in English Language Education at the university level. A quantitative research approach was used, focusing on first-semester students in Class A as the research sample and Class B for test trials. The sample consisted of 33 students (13 males and 20 females) from the English Language Education program at FKIP Universitas Islam Riau. The study employed a vocabulary test in multiple-choice format, and simple purposive sampling was used to distribute the test. The test link was shared via the class chairman, and SPSS version 25 was used for data analysis. The research identified students' difficulties in vocabulary mastery through their test results. The results indicated an average student score of 69, categorized as "Good." Specifically, 3 students scored between 86 and 100 ("Excellent"), 16 students scored between 66 and 85 ("Good"), 11 students scored between 46 and 65 ("Fair"), and 3 students scored between 26 and 45 ("Poor"). Thus, most students performed in the "Good" range on the vocabulary test. The analysis revealed that students faced significant difficulties with prepositions, verbs, and pronouns. In contrast, nouns and conjunctions were less challenging for students. Among the vocabulary areas, prepositions were particularly difficult for students, indicating that questions involving prepositions were the most challenging.
Downloads
References
Alizadeh,I, (2016) Vocabulary teaching techniques: A review of common practices, 23. Lahijan Branch, Islamic University, Lahijan, Iran. Vol 1, No, 1.
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The Importance of Vocabulary in Language Learning and How to Be Taught. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 67-76.
Astuti, D. S. (2014). The Role of Vocabulary in Language Learning: A Review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 45-58.
Bai,Z, (2018)An analysis of English vocabulary learning strategies, 854. Shanxi Normal University,Linfen,China.
Bahri,S, & Sugeng,B, (2008) Difficulties in writing in vocabulary and grammar.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What Reading Does for the Mind. American Educator, 22(1), 8-15.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 143.New York: EdwardsBrothers, Pearson.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press.
Edmons,E, & Candy,L, (2018) Practice-based research in the creative arts, 63.
Effendi,M,S, & Rokhyati,U, (2017) A study on grammar teaching an English education department in an EFL context, 43. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Newbury House Publishers.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and Incidental Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Reappraisal of Elaboration, Rehearsal, and Automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs,T, & Gheyle.N. (2017) Content Analysis: a short overvie. Ghent University.
Maskor,Z,M & Baharudin,H, (2016) Receptive vocabulary knowledge or productive vocabulary knowledge in writing skill, 263. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Muchtar,N, (2017) Nine part of speech in teaching English to electrical engineering students, 541. Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. ASCD.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.
Nassaji,H, (2016) Qualitative and descriptive research, 129. University of Victoria.
Panggabean,S,B, (2016) Students’ problems in learning conjunction, 2. FDK UINSU Lectures.
Popescu,F, (2001) The verb and the phrase in contemporary English, 14. Universitatea Dunarea de Jos Galati.
asim,S, (2012) A study of adjective and adjectival phrase,4. Al-Muntansiriya University.
Qvortrup,A, Wiberg,M, (2016) On the definition of learning, 22. University Presss of Southern Denmark.
Rahmatillah, (2015) A study on students’ difficulties in leraningvocabulary, 72. Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Raden Intan Lampung.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Diversity in Research and Practice. Palgrave Macmilla
Schafer,M, & Maienborn,C, (2011) Adverb and adverbials, 1392. University of Tuebingen.
Subhi,S,N, (2015) Investigating study of an English spelling error, 235. School of Language Studies and Linguistics, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities.
Suharsimi, (2002) Prosedur penelitian, suatu pendekatan praktek. 203. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Syarifudin,A, & Marbun,R, (2017) An analysis on the students’ vocabulary mastery a descriptive study, 2. FKIP Untan.
Thiruvengadam,P, (2018) A review of vocabulary teaching techniques for young learners, 53. Sri Candrasekharendra Saraswati Viswa Mahavidyalaya University.
Wahyudi,D, (2016) Vocabulary mastery by using flash card, 6. Jurnal Ilmiah FKIP Universitas Subang.
Zulfahri,A, & Marhum,M (2016) Improving vocabulary mastery through meaningful alphabet technique, 48.Pascasarjana University
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Harselina Harselina, Andi Idayani, Betty Sailun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made. All of the remixes, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.