RESPON AMERIKA SERIKAT PADA MASA PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDEN DONALD TRUMP TERHADAP PROGRAM NUKLIR KOREA UTARA

Authors

  • Geno Vybra Yoga Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Deterrence, Donald Trump, North Korea, Nuclear, United States

Abstract

This research aims to explain the application of the United states deterrence strategy in response to the development of North Korea's nuclear program during the administration of Donald Trump in 2017-2019. As a super power country, he has a responsibility to create and maintain security stability in the world. This research use deterrence as theory. According to Silvia Romeo, the deterrence strategy includes three activities namely persuading the target country to cancel its intention; take action against the target country; and policy changes through changes in government. Qualitative methods applied in this research. The result is that the United States carried out a deterrence strategy against North Korea related to the development of its nuclear program through several measures such as the imposition of economic sanctions, strengthening the defense sector with its allies, South Korea and Japan by reforming the defense cooperation alliance and installing the THAAD defense system in South Korea, and negotiations through the Singapore Summit in 2018 and the Vietnam Summit in 2019. The purpose of this is to realize the denuclearization of North Korea and also as a form of US efforts to maintain its hegemony in the Asia Pacific region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baylis, J., Wirtz, J., & Gray, C. (Eds.). (2018). Strategy in the contemporary world. Oxford University Press, USA.

BBC News Indonesia, (2019) “Lawatan Pertama Xi Jinping ke Korea Utara: Mengapa terjadi Sekarang?” https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-48704622

BBC News.(2017) “DK PBB Jatuhkan Sanksi „Paling keras Sepanjang Satu Generasi‟ terhadap Korea Utara”.https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-40841491

BBC News. (2019) “KTT Trump-Kim di Hanoi Berakhir Tanpa Kesepakatan, Upacara Penandatanganan Dibatalkan”.
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-47400070

BBC News.(2019) “KTT Trump-Kim di Hanoi: Semua yang Perlu Anda Ketahui”. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-47375723

BBC News. (2017) “Nuklir Korut: Korsel Latihan Rudal, AS Ancam „Pembalasan Militer Besar-besaran‟. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-41144846

BBC News. (2018) “Pertemuan Puncak Trump dan Kim Jong Un di Singapura: Empat Hal yang Perlu Diketahui”. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-44397662

Tahir Saleh (2019) CNBC Indonesia. “Astaga! KTT Gagal, Korut Siap Luncurkan Roket”.
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190310063500-4-59696/astaga-ktt-gagal-korut-siap-luncurkan-roket

CNN Indonesia.(2017) “AS-Korea Selatan Perkuat Kerja Sama Pertahanan”.
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20170131111603-113-190230/as-korea-selatan-perkuat-kerja-sama-pertahanan

CNN Indonesia.(2018) “Mengintip Isi Perjanjian Trump dan Kim Jong Un”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20180612151952-106-305567/mengintip-isi-perjanjian-trump-dan-kim-jong-un

CNN Indonesia.(2019) “Secarik Kertas yang‟Menggagalkan‟ KTT AS-Korut Hanoi”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20190330074727-134-381946/secarik-kertas-yang-menggagalkan-ktt-as-korut-di-hanoi

Detik News.(2017) “Disanksi PBB, ini yang Tidak Boleh Dilakukan Korea Utara”. https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-3588090/disanksi- pbb-ini-yang-tak-boleh-dilakukan-korea-utara

Detik News.(2017) “Trump Embargo Negara yang Berbisnis dengan Korea Utara”. https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-3626925/trump- ancam-embargo-negara-yang-berbisnis-dengan-korut

Einhorn, R., & Pifer, S. (2017). Meeting US Deterrence Requirements: Toward a Sustainable National Consensus: a Working Group Report. Brookings.

Elliott, B. (2003, September). Deterrence theory revisited. In road safety research, policing and education conference (pp. 24-26).

Iriawan, S.(2017) Reformasi Aliansi Pertahanan Amerika Serikat-Jepang-Korea Selatan Menghadapi Ancaman Nuklir Korea Utara. International & Diplomacy Vol. 3 No.1. Hal 104

ISDP,(2017) “THAAD on the Korean Peninsula” https://isdp.eu/publication/korea-thaad/

Kumparan,(2017) “Trump Terbangkan Dua Pesawat Bomber B-1 ke Semenanjung Korea”. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/trump-terbangkan-dua-pesawat-bomber-b1-ke-semenanjung-korea

Morgan, P. M. (2003). Deterrence now (Vol. 89). Cambridge University Press.

Permata, I. M. (2019). Analisis Konstruktivisme: Prilaku Korea Utara Terhadap Denuklirisasi. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 8(2), 104-116.

Purwono, A., & Zuhri, A. S. (2010). Peran Nuklir Korea Utara Sebagai Instrumen Diplomasi Politik Internasional. SPEKTRUM, 7(2).

Putri, N. A. A. (2019). Respon Tiongkok Terhadap Penempatan Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (Thaad) Amerika Serikat Di Korea Selatan (2016-2018).

Romeo, S. (2016). Coercive diplomacy, theories and application: a case study on US administration and Libya.

Slantchev, B. L. (2005). Introduction to International Relations Lecture 8: Deterrence and Compellence. Lecture, Department of Political Science, University of California–San Diego.

Tempo.co.(2017) “Berbagai Sanksi PBB untuk Korea Utara dalam 11 Tahun”. https://dunia.tempo.co/read/910196/berbagai-sanksi-pbb-untuk-korea-utara-dalam-11-tahun

Tirto.Id.(2017) “AS Dorong Embargo Minyak ke Korut untuk Bidik Kim Jong Un.” https://tirto.id/as-dorong-embargo-minyak-ke-korut-untuk- bidik-kim-jong-un-cv8p

Romeo, S. (2016). Coercive diplomacy, theories and application: a case study on US administration and Libya.

VOA Indonesia.(2018) “Lakukan Transaksi dengan Korut, Perusahaan Rusia dan China Terkena Sanksi AS”. Diakses melalui https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/lakukan-transaksi-dengan-korut- perusahaan-rusia-dan-china-terkena-sanksi-as/4530785.html

VOA Indonesia.(2019) “Sanksi-sanksi Ekonomi Trump Tak Membawa Hasil yang Diharapkan.” https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/sanksi-sanksi-ekonomi-trump-tak-membawa-hasil-yang-diharapkan-/4901489.html

Perry, W. J. (2006). Proliferation on the Peninsula: Five North Korean Nuclear Crises. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607(1), 78-86.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-27